Bossart |

10 month ago

Hello, I have a question and would like some answers from the managers. Do you think it's normal for agreements to (supposedly) make loans to clubs in order to develop, improve infrastructure or buy players when the clubs in question will never repay these very high sums even though it's an obligation, but is it really possible to control this? Isn't it unfair when clubs from the same division meet in the same season? Shouldn't the game rethink its economic business? Perhaps giving more turnover during a home match or perhaps a bonus each year depending on the level of infrastructure of the clubs as in reality with what the professional football league does in France.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Bossart |

10 month ago

Can't wait to hear what you have to say on this subject


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Alexandre67310 |

10 month ago

For our part, all loans must be repaid.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Bossart |

10 month ago
[Alexandre67310]For our part, all loans must be repaid[/quote]

Unfortunately not all agreements do this.

This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

kiki-sainté |

10 month ago

A la nwo No loan money if you want a banana take a job 😁😁😁


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Lolo7 |

10 month ago

On the whole, large loans are repaid. It's up to each agreement to manage its money as it sees fit and there's nothing you can do about it 😉


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Zeus |

10 month ago

You have to choose your agreement carefully 🤣🤣


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message