Hello Aymeric and hello everyone,

I'd like to submit an idea for improving the management of young players in our CDFs.
This idea came to me this morning following a frustrating dilemma: I was forced to release a player with a potential of 80 just to free up some space. It's a real waste to see a young player with such potential released, when he could have greatly helped other managers, especially those who are just starting out or who just need it.

The idea:
Allow youngsters from the CDF to be transferred directly between clubs.

The benefits:
Reduced waste: High-potential players are no longer discarded for lack of space, but promoted within the community.

Mutual assistance between managers: This will boost exchanges and reinforce the social and strategic aspects of the game, particularly within the agreements.

Realism: In the real world of football, clubs regularly transfer talented young players who don't yet have a professional contract.
I hope this suggestion can be considered for a future update.
Thanks in advance for your feedback and enjoy the game!

Great idea +1

It's an idea, but I think it needs fine-tuning:

• I don't really like the idea of transferring an 80 pot to a cdf <9. Yes, it exists, particularly with U17 tournaments, but it's still marginal
• it would make it possible to develop cdf management, a subject that has been discussed for a long time and has remained unresolved
• it's certainly interesting for the development of cohesion within agreements, but I think you're creating a huge imbalance between small and large agreements, which A45 refutes from what I've understood (the idea being to develop more agreements, not to give more resources to the big ones).

On the other hand, it's still an interesting idea, and one that could bring up a subject that I think was discussed during the last vocals.

Very good point Lahi, there's too much wastage of youngsters in the CDFs and that's not ideal. Transferring youngsters between CDFs could greatly help some clubs to strengthen themselves in the future and improve their management. I think it's an excellent idea, with perhaps some contributions, and I think the project will be implemented.

I find the idea very interesting, but as has been said, it needs to be refined further. But how can we overcome the difference in cdf levels between clubs in the case of a profile resulting from detection? A young 80+ pot for a 9 or 10 cdf corresponds to a 65 or 67 pot for a less developed cdf.
But otherwise it's a good idea that could boost this aspect of the game and allow more clubs to benefit from talented players.

I had submitted the idea via the discord opened to discuss between the agreements some time ago, to open transfers for the cdf, many had loved the idea then I said to myself, that it would not be feasible compared to the levels of cdf.
Mais si il y a une solution je suis toujours pour en limiteant par exemple a 3 transferts par saison max, il ne faut pas plus qu'il y a de l'abus

An interesting idea for maximising profits between multi-accounts. It will allow some clubs to sell 16 youngsters a season, by the batch, to the training centres of clubs that will never be able to release them, since only 2.5 youngsters can be released per season.

But what improvement? Which club, which plays seriously in VF with a cdf 10, does not have a single player in its training centre to take out?

I think all the VF clubs do joint scouting, don't they? There are also people who share their scouting for free on this forum.

Lahi explains that he had to "sacrifice" a young potential 80. He forgets to mention that this season we've found a lot of potential 80 players in scouting. At RTG alone, I think we've got around thirty players with a potential 80 or more who have been spotted and ended up being snapped up by nobody!

On the other hand, if we open this Pandora's box, it will mean that the cdf1s will be able to buy cdf10 players with the potential of the cdf10s, with all the problems that will go with that, and a 3 or 4-fold increase in the number of players who will be released each season .... Via multi-accounts.

Without me.

The very idea of having 80 or more potential players in a tier 1 CDF makes me imagine all the possible abuses. it's going to be hell. Just imagine, it's as if we decided to do away with all the rules governing transfers!!!! That would be crazy!

They idea is a good one i hope it will be endorse

An idea proposed to Aymeric a few (long) months ago... About 2 years ago, from memory, when we were asked to think about reforms to the main modules of the game.
Among the proposals for the detection module, which have already been mentioned on this forum, one of them was to authorise cdf-to-cdf sales, within a framework that avoided abuse. In practice, it was proposed that :

• the level of cdf of the selling club is lower than that of the buying club (to avoid abusive exchanges between elitist clubs).
• The number of authorised cdf-to-cdf sales would be limited to 1 sale (clubs from level 1 to 9) and/or 1 purchase (clubs from level 2 to 10) per manager (to avoid player trafficking or fraudulently enriching less prestigious clubs) and per season (to avoid destabilising the operation of the detection system).
• Prior to this, the reform aimed at establishing a quantitative rather than qualitative detection system for each CFD level would be implemented. (See #forum?topic=158239).

To date, I don't even know if Aymeric is aware of this proposal.

Unfortunately, as Demi mentions, it would be too much of a boon for the multi. They've already proliferated since the end of transfer control, so there's no need to add another layer.

Mdr 53 likes for this idea, which is certainly very nice, but compared to others ^^.
In IRL, how many people is that?

OK, I'm off, where do I leave?

the next topic will be to find out if we can share an account between 15 members of the same agreement.

There's no point in puffing out your chest and behaving like a physiognomist at the entrance to a nightclub with those who find this improvement project laughable.
Just as it's pointless to get people to like the AFU and AFU2 en masse to inflate the number of likes.
There's only one person who needs convincing and who doesn't care about all that (likes and over-zealousness).

So you've made your proposal, now all you have to do is wait for an opinion from the mdj or a future new feature that goes in this direction.

à moins de faire des echanges qu'entre niv 10 de cdf voir de meme niveau inferieur dis moi si se projet viendrai à être accepté, quoi servirai t il que les plus petits niveaux de cdf monte encore leur cdf. il suffiraira simplement d'intégrer une entente et lui remplir sont cdf ou en partie.

So as some have shown in their post, it will give another element to promote multis.

Seeing a project like this in the past and we all throw ourselves into the multi and fill our pockets.

If you set up 2 to 3 sales per season, I don't see where you're going to bid on the members of the agreements.
Yes, they will improve thanks to these players, but an agreement is there to help.
Then you have to set maximum and minimum prices.
Lahi, that's what I was saying above, which is why I didn't make this proposal myself because there were too many risks involved and I was sure there would be some unhappy people.
All we need to do is propose this project in more detail and think carefully so that everyone likes it
Courage and rework the project a little.

An improvement project, as its name suggests, is there to try and enhance certain aspects of the game. A project can be in the making and by making real, tangible contributions you could turn it into something. This manoeuvre of trying to dissuade a project that you don't "feel" is ridiculous.
To move the topic forward, I suggest creating a youth auction with a maximum of 3 players per season per club and capping the maximum for auctions.

Otherwise, to avoid abuse
Simply set a price per potential
Let's say
Potential 80 -> 20m
Potential 81 -> 25m
Etc ...
You'd have to create a transfer area hiding the player's name
That way when you buy the youngster
You don't know which cdf he comes from
And the price is fixed per potential