qzaa57 |

11 month ago

Hello,
I thought I read at the start of the season that Aymeric was thinking of combining certain championships for next season, and that these championships would be called the "new" regions. With less than two days to go before the start of the new season, I wanted to know what the situation was. Thanks a lot :)


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

David59 |

11 month ago

I think he said it wasn't for next season


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

qzaa57 |

11 month ago


Ah... but this message is from the beginning of the season. I must have missed an episode

This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Marcus Aurelius |

11 month ago

He made it clear that this would not be the case this time.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

qzaa57 |

11 month ago
[He has made it clear that it won't be this time[/quote]

All right, thanks for your replies

This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Bossart |

11 month ago

Perhaps a reform to increase club revenues would be a good priority for next season? Because small clubs have no budget to develop or buy players


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

villa |

11 month ago

It seems to me that the purpose of the reform was precisely to get money out of the system, so a step backwards is not too far-fetched


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Bossart |

11 month ago

To be honest, if things continue like this in terms of the club's income, I'm going to need at least two or three seasons just to increase the infrastructure by 1 level. Maybe that's the problem with the lack of active managers. As far as I'm concerned, that means that for at least 120 days I won't be doing anything apart from playing a few league games.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Fougch |

11 month ago

I don't agree. I started from 0 in terms of infrastructure 9 months ago. I made a few purchases to set up a team, and I've never needed money, at least I had it when I needed it for infrastructure. You just have to be careful not to get ahead of yourself, but in reality if you have a long-term vision you'll do very well, you just have to learn not to spend willy-nilly. What's more, you have an agreement, and they're also there to help you by lending you players for training in return for a bonus, so it's a win-win situation for them (and managers outside the agreement are prepared to do the same). There are plenty of ways to boost the coffers!


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Bossart |

11 month ago

[I don't agree. I started from 0 in terms of infrastructure 9 months ago. I made a few purchases to build a team, and I've never needed money, well I had it when I needed it for infrastructure. You just have to be careful not to get ahead of yourself, but in reality if you have a long-term vision you'll do very well, you just have to learn not to spend money willy-nilly. What's more, you have an agreement, and they're also there to help you by lending you players for training in return for a bonus, so it's a win-win situation for them (and managers outside the agreement are prepared to do the same). I've never needed money to develop myself and I think I'm a very good manager for my club. I'm just making an observation, I'm well aware that it takes time to develop, but as far as the aid from the agreements is concerned, I think that's unfair, and that's not really what I see as the way to develop. A realistic game develops either by increasing turnover with ticket sales or by trading, even if it's complicated because new managers don't have the means to buy players at around +45 level. That's the reality of the game at the moment. Apart from the big clubs who can put in several million, the others can't even put 1 million on a player. As far as I'm concerned, if I don't succeed in meeting the sponsor's target for two seasons, no development will be possible.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Fougch |

11 month ago

I'm not criticising your club management, I'm not in a position to do that. Nevertheless, you've put your finger on something interesting: taking 1 or 2 seasons to raise a level? That's fine. Anticipate this rise in level, set yourself a budget and an achievable sponsor, and I promise you that you'll get there.
I'm at the same level as you and I think I have the same problems. However, I reached 50M in the middle of the season, when I passed level 4, which enabled me to raise all my possible infra levels (still in progress).
No agreement loans, no untimely buy-sell (because you can lose out if you don't know the market), and a sponsor that can be successfully reached each season.
All too often I see levels 1-2 or 3 wanting to move too quickly, by buying players at +70NG for example. Except that they don't need to, especially as they're usually buying old players who won't be able to resell. Obviously a 70NG player aged 31 bought for 2M is cool for a low level, but 2 seasons later you have to renew. If you do the same thing for a whole team, you'll certainly increase your points, but you'll mainly have to reinvest in a team without thinking about the infra when you go up a level.
You have a very good example recently, with the young pot80s who no longer have any progression. Young managers who don't know the market or even how progression works are throwing themselves at it. Forget the transfer business, lose your matches and move up the tactical ladder - time is on your side and you'll be doing wonders in 10-15 seasons' time! The game is very well thought out, and the club revenues are not inappropriate.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Aurelius |

11 month ago
[I don't agree. I started from 0 in terms of infrastructure 9 months ago. I made a few purchases to build a team, and I never needed money, well I had it when I needed it for infrastructure. You just have to be careful not to get ahead of yourself, but in reality if you have a long-term vision you'll do very well, you just have to learn not to spend money willy-nilly. What's more, you have an agreement, and they're also there to help you by lending you players for training in return for a bonus, so it's a win-win situation for them (and managers outside the agreement are prepared to do the same). I've never needed money to develop myself and I think I'm a very good manager for my club. I'm just making an observation, I'm well aware that it takes time to develop, but as far as the aid from the agreements is concerned, I think that's unfair, and that's not really what I see as the way to develop. A realistic game develops either by increasing turnover with ticket sales or by trading, even if it's complicated because new managers don't have the means to buy players at around +45 level. That's the reality of the game at the moment. Apart from the big clubs who can put in several million, the others can't even put 1 million on a player. As far as I'm concerned, if I don't succeed in meeting the sponsor's target for two seasons, no development will be possible[/quote]

Everyone has struggled with the game and that's the essence of its longevity. A game that's too simple is of little interest. This is a LONG term management game.

This message has been translated. (FR) Original message