Hi there :)
It may not be a priority for many managers but I think the cartel championship remains one of the best activities in VF,
I think that evolution on the subject could be good to make this championship more competitive,

Several possible ideas:

• Working on how to make the current championship tighter by reducing the number of agreements per Division, 8 / 10 / 12, to tighten the level of divisions, with much more possibility of climbing down and fewer agreements in soft belly.
  There's still the question of Ententes 2, a separate field?

• Work on how to distribute the clubs in the agreements better, so that more agreements fight for the top of the table,
  Reduce the maximum number of clubs that can play IE, say to 15/18, so each club playing IE would have to play 7/8, if this is not the case then each of the agreements would not necessarily play 100, but at the same time some agreements would be too crowded and some clubs would change agreement.

• ....
  It's up to you, but I think we could do better than we do at the moment, a lot of clubs don't play anything and that's a shame.

Sincerely

Donpanini: Salut :)
C’est peut être pas la priorité de beaucoup de managers mais je penses que le championnat des ententes reste une des meilleurs activités de VF,
Je penses que évolution sur le sujet pourrais être bien pour rendre plis compétitif ce championnats,

Plusieurs idée possible :

• Travailler sur comment rendre plus serré le championnat actuel en réduisant le nombre des ententes par Division, 8/10/12, pour resserrer le niveau des divisions, avec beaucoup plus de possibilité de monter descen...

We should also do away with the fanciful agreements created by inactive people, especially level 1s, who populate the D5.

Ramzan Kadyrov: Faudrait aussi supprimé les ententes fantaisistes créées par des inactif surtout de niv1 qui peuplent la D5

Yes and no, they don't bother anyone, no need to look at them ;)

Donpanini: Oui et non elle dérange personne, pas besoin de les regardées ;)

Ok

An 8-club field ie it's good like the championships
With D2 then d3....

junior: Un champ a 8 club ie c'est bien comme les championnats
Avec les D2 puis d3....

That's what I think too,
Would a vote be possible on the subject?

On reducing or leaving as you know today?

junior: Un champ a 8 club ie c'est bien comme les championnats
Avec les D2 puis d3....

I really like your idea

"work on how to distribute clubs more evenly in the agreements, so that more agreements are fighting for the top of the table".

It's up to the clubs to have a bit of ambition and character, and to ensure that their average agreements progress towards the top rather than signing up to the 2 or 3 very big agreements in the game as soon as they don't get the results they want.

It's also up to these clubs to have the character not to recruit good managers from the medium-sized clubs if they want to see more competitive clubs.

It always amazes me that the people who are calling for competitiveness are in cartels that are doing everything they can to crush the competition.

Or we could take the problem in the other direction, as Aymeric seems to be doing, and reduce the total number of ie to be played for each agreement. Mechanically, there will be fewer managers playing ie in each agreement. On the one hand, some members will be forced to leave their current agreements if they want to play ie in D1. On the other hand, agreements that have 7 or 8 very good managers will be more competitive than at present because these managers will play a greater proportion of their agreement's ie's than at present.

As far as I'm concerned, when I talk about competitiveness, it's mainly about having matches that are a little tighter.

Because we see several teams programming an IE and :

• Not being connected to a single match (and to all the matches)
• Have a weaker-than-average team
• Use a no-bonus style to be well countered
• Give tactical instructions to the west and leave plenty of room for manoeuvre

I don't really see the added value of this kind of match in D1.

Hi, great idea

Demi-cerveau: "travailler sur comment mieux répartir les clubs dans les ententes, pour que plus d’ententes se battent pour le haut de tableau"

C'est aux clubs d'avoir un peu d'ambition et de caractère, et de faire en sorte que leurs ententes moyennes progressent vers les sommets plutôt que de signer dans les 2 ou 3 très grosses ententes du jeu dès qu'ils n'ont pas les résultats escomptés.

C'est aussi à ces ententes d'avoir le caractère de ne pas recruter les bons managers des ententes moyennes si ils veu...

with the current system, there is no, or extremely rare, possibility of upgrading a weak or even average agreement to one capable of playing at the top of the league table.

And I don't see how an agreement could restrict itself by refusing competitive clubs from its rivals. It doesn't really make sense.

Increasing the chances of smaller clubs challenging the bigger ones is the only way to increase competitiveness, and the organisation/rules must allow this.

I agree with the idea of a reduced number of matches insofar as the current system favours grouping the best players in a limited number of agreements.

If we limit 2 agreements, one main and one sister, it wouldn't be bad for competitiveness. It would mean that a lot of teams who go for 2 or 3 because it's a better bonus would think twice before going.

Magikcats: Si on limite 2 ententes , une principal et une soeur ce serait pas mal pour la compétitivité. Ça permet que beaucoup d'équipes qui vont sur des 2 ou 3 car meilleur prime ie réfléchiront a 2 fois avant d'y aller.

Totally false.... you could reduce to 10 members by agreement that the guys will stay in the big ones for the most part....
I can give you the example of the LV, where very few people take their bonuses.

hazard14: Totalement faux.... vous pourrai réduire à 10 membre par entente que les gars resteront dans les grosses pour le plupart....
Je peux te donner l exemple de la lv ou il y a très très peu de monde qui prennent leurs primes .

I remember at the LFL the majority of departures were for 2/3 agreements and yet the LFL was in D1.

Magikcats: Je me rappelais a la lfl la majorité des départs étaient pour des ententes 2/3 et pourtant la LFL était en D1

Don't be fooled, there are quite a few guys who just want to compete for fun and not to be at the top of their game.

hazard14: Faut pas croire il y a pas mal de mec qui cherche juste la compétition pour le plaisir et non pour être au top du top.

A lot of them go where the money is. You can't argue with that.
And then there's Lucas, who does all the deals in the game.

Magikcats: Ya beaucoup qui vont là où y'a l'argent aussi. Faut pas dire le contraire.
Après sinon tu as Lucas qui fait toutes les ententes du jeu

Lucas lol yes
Frankly, not so much. Personally, if you come to the lv to get rich, you're wasting your time.
I think that helping each other is better with the big guys.

It's a subject that's been discussed many times, and I get the impression that a good majority of us are in favour of having fewer agreements, at least in d1.

Aymeric wants more agreement on the game but there's talk of mergers everywhere.
With fewer agreements in the divisions, it's no longer worth continuing with the small agreements.
We might as well integrate a big agreement and call it a day

kiki-sainté: Aymeric veux plus d entente sur le jeu mais ça parle fusion de partout
En mettant moins d entente dans les divisions ça ne vaut plus le coup de continuer pour les petites ententes
Autant intégré une grosse entente et tout arrêter

Picardy should be abolished.

Magik'jojo: Il faudrait supprimer la picardie.

Also

We are replacing agreements with micro-agreements.

5 members max - 25 IEs over the season
IS: 3 players/club + 4 for the coach = 16 players.

Divisions like the championships with a D1 of 8 and a D2 of 16 (two groups) etc...

The last two are replaced by the D2 champions.

A real $$ reward for the top 3 finishers (as in the championship).

The big teams are forced to explode, while the smaller teams are happy. There are more agreements: a45 is happy.

Anyone can try for the title with 4 friends of their own (or with 4 multis, because it's a cooperative game).

Each change in a club's agreement will have a snowball effect.

A carrot in the bag, fewer matches, 4 close friends: every match will be monitored and decisive.

At the end of each season, the champion micro-agreement is disbanded (because the mdj likes it that way) and the 5 clubs are drafted (because the mdj likes it that way) by the rising micro-agreements. [This one I'm less sure of 🤣]

We upset everything, everyone grumbles, aymeric disappears 6mois to celebrate. 🥳

So? 😎

Deck: On remplace les ententes par les micro-ententes.

5 membres max - 25 IEs sur la saison
IS : 3 joueurs /club + 4 pour le sélectionneur = 16 joueurs.

Des divisions comme les championnats avec un D1 à 8 une D2 à 16 (deux groupes) etc...

Les deux derniers sont remplacés par les champions de D2.

On met une vrai récompense $$ pour les 3 premiers du classement (comme en championnat)

Les grosses écuries sont obligés d'exploser, les petites structures sont contentes. Il y a plus+ d'ententes : a45...

It's not the NBA 🤣🤣🤣.

Deck: On remplace les ententes par les micro-ententes.

5 membres max - 25 IEs sur la saison
IS : 3 joueurs /club + 4 pour le sélectionneur = 16 joueurs.

Des divisions comme les championnats avec un D1 à 8 une D2 à 16 (deux groupes) etc...

Les deux derniers sont remplacés par les champions de D2.

On met une vrai récompense $$ pour les 3 premiers du classement (comme en championnat)

Les grosses écuries sont obligés d'exploser, les petites structures sont contentes. Il y a plus+ d'ententes : a45...

I love these joke proposals that end up being adopted

Play with the MDJ's humorous sensibilities.
He's going to come like the taxman on your bank account 😅

🤣🤣🤣🤣

If you add to that the complete deregulation of transfers, a single squad transferred from club to club (which avoids problems of affinity) every 5 IE can do the job.

It's magic.

We could also go down to 12 agreements.

Put an emoji in front of it or say humour so it doesn't take me seriously 😭😂😁

estac: J'adore ces propositions lancées pour rigoler qui finissent par être adoptées

I love it too ;) it will be a real revolution