Tazz26 |

3 month ago

Hello,
A small bug: this morning an 11th Inter entente match was added to the calendar.
Could you please remove it?
Thank you very much

#match?mid=6089956


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Tazz26 |

3 month ago

One match has been deleted, but not the right one. Tomorrow's match was added this morning, even though my 10 matches were scheduled.

My match against: Chloom SC should therefore be rescheduled for 31/01 and tomorrow's match, as indicated above, should be deleted.

Thank you


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

hazard14 |

3 month ago

It's always the last match on the list that is deleted, which is normal


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Tazz26 |

3 month ago

It's not normal at all. What kind of crazy idea is that? We organise matches according to a calendar, nothing is "random" if I may say so myself. I'm not going to fight about it, but I think the administrators will agree with me on this bug.

The match on the 31st has been organised for several days. I don't see why a bug should get the better of my organisation. What's more, we've already met this season, and the scoreline was a goalless draw, which makes for a great tie between the two teams.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

hazard14 |

3 month ago

At that point I tell my friends that we're all scheduling matches at the same time to reach 104,105 and then we ask the admins to delete the matches that suit us ..... no, it's not crazy as you say


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Socrate |

3 month ago
The ideal is to delete the match that causes problems.
The aim is not to delete the match that suits us but really the match that is too much.
[When it is mentioned in the request[/b]

This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

hazard14 |

3 month ago

We had the same problem in lv2 and it was the last matches that were deleted.... I'll find out the next time you can choose your match


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Morten34 |

3 month ago

It's not a bug, because I'm the one who deleted the 31/01 match following a message from Teddy.
You always delete the last match on the list.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Tazz26 |

3 month ago

The bug is that I already had 10 IE programmed and someone was still able to accept an old match request.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Tazz26 |

3 month ago

If we'd done away with the last match, my long-planned opponent would have been left out in the cold. It's not very logical. Deleting the match caused by a bug makes a bit more sense. But that's just my opinion. Thank you Socrate. Good evening âœŒđŸ»


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Morten34 |

3 month ago

I repeat, we're deleting the farthest match, not the one you're referring to.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Hydilik |

3 month ago

Morten34: Je répÚte, on supprime le match le plus lointain, pas celui que vous nous désignez.

Mortens, do you remove the last matches from the list? Personally, my match was scheduled 39 hours ago and there were 99 of us when it was validated. I've just discovered that it's been deleted. Not easy to deal with, I admit


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Magpie |

3 month ago

I don't think you understand each other.
Let's summarise. The matches created have an ID that increments as you go along.
For example, Tazz's IE 09 match will have ID 500145
Match 10 will have ID 500167
Match 11 will have ID 500186

We're in agreement, the match to be deleted, the one that was programmed after the 10 IEs affected is Tazz's IE with the highest ID?
Not the farthest match in the calendar (31/01, which may have been generated as match 10, for example).

Reading this, I get the impression that the admins are saying they're deleting the "farthest" match, so that suggests that only the calendar aspect counts. However, this potentially means deleting match 10 on 31/01, and keeping match 11 as a result?


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Socrate |

3 month ago

Personally, I follow the logic you set out, Magpie.
I delete the match that is missing and not the furthest match in the calendar.
The bug is that there's an 11th match scheduled, so solving the bug means deleting the 11th match.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Demi-cerveau |

3 month ago

Magpie: Je pense que vous ne vous comprenez pas sur les termes.
Résumons. Les matchs crées ont un ID qui s'incrémentent au fur et à mesure.
Exemple, le match IE 09 de Tazz aura ID 500145
Match 10 aura ID 500167
Match 11 aura ID 500186

On est bien d'accord, le match a supprimer, celui qui a été programmé apres les 10 IE affectés est l'IE de Tazz ayant l'ID le plus élevé ?
Pas le match le plus loin au niveau calendaire (31/01 qui a peut-ĂȘtre Ă©tĂ© generĂ© comme match 10 par exemple).

It's a bit more complicated than that in practice. You also have to think about the other agreement, which should not be prejudiced if the 101st match is created very close to the current date. Deleting the match furthest back in time usually gives the other agreement time to find another match.

And this isn't really a bug. It's a fault of the agreement in question, which requires more than 100 matches. I say this all the more freely because we made the same mistake at rtg this season, and we paid a high price for it.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Tazz26 |

3 month ago

Thank you Magpie for expressing my thoughts more clearly.

Demi, in this case it's not about exceeding the number of matches per agreement but per club.
In fact, I had my counter at 9 matches IE. To have a better chance of finding a match, I proposed a lot of different dates at different times.
A few hours after setting up the matches, I myself found a match available on 31/01. So I accepted it and ended up with 10 scheduled matches. Except that 3 days later... someone came to accept one of the matches initially proposed. This is where the game could have calculated the number of matches and prevented this 11th match in my opinion. I don't see what fault I could have made, apart from trying to get one more match on the calendar.
No one died, this little anomaly has no real impact on the standings etc., but one day it might. A subject to be dealt with :)


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Morten34 |

3 month ago

But there's nothing to talk about. We're deleting the match that's furthest away because, as Demi explained so well, that gives the other agreement time to find a match. Quite simply.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Tazz26 |

3 month ago

Very good chief. Have a nice day


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Demi-cerveau |

3 month ago

Tazz26: Merci Magpie d'avoir exprimé plus clairement le fond de ma pensée.

Demi, la en l'occurrence ce n'est pas le sujet du dépassement des matchs par entente mais bien par club.
Dans les faits, j'avais mon compteur a 9 matchs IE. Pour avoir plus de chance de trouver un match, j'ai proposé beaucoup de dates différentes a des horaires différentes.
Quelques heures aprĂšs avoir posĂ© les matchs, j'ai moi mĂȘme trouvĂ© un match de disponible le 31/01. Je l'ai donc acceptĂ© et suis arrivĂ© a 10 ma

In this case, when you found your 10th match, you should have booked friendlies on the days on which you'd made requests. That would have prevented your requests, which remain active until you've booked a match, from being accepted. This is still the case if, by chance, you made requests on the days remaining until the end of the season. If this is the case, I strongly advise you to schedule a match very quickly on the day of the requests.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Tazz26 |

3 month ago

Thanks for the technique, I hadn't thought of that. It's a solution to avoid the bug, but the game could provide a barrier to this 11th match. But I guess that's not the priority, so we'll do without it.
So I'm off to fill in the calendar!


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message