Maguatte |
2 days agoHello everyone,
I’d like to put forward an idea which, in my view, could bring about a real change to the Entente system: the possibility of building and developing infrastructure owned by the Ententes.
🏟️ 1. Building a stadium for each Alliance
Each Alliance could have its own stadium, which it could build, upgrade and expand using the funds available in its coffers.
This stadium could host IS (Inter-Selection) matches. The revenue generated from ticket sales would go directly into the Alliance’s coffers.
The stadium’s capacity, its level of improvement and attendance figures could all influence the revenue generated.
💰 2. Making effective use of the alliances’ funds
At present, the money is used solely to fund the clubs, and I think it would be worthwhile to place greater emphasis on the management of these funds.
Under this system, chairmen and treasurers would have to manage expenditure more carefully rather than giving money away without counting the cost (I’m not saying we should give just for the sake of giving without expecting a return).
The money would therefore no longer be used solely for loans, but would play a genuinely important role within the Entente.
🏗️ 3. Possibility of adding further facilities
In the longer term, other facilities could be considered, such as a training centre that would provide a bonus to loaned players.
And other facilities, each with their own impact and significance.
🤝 Conclusion
The aim of this proposal is simple: to give the Entente greater significance.
The stadium, in particular, could be an interesting first step, as IS matches could be played there and the money would go directly into the Alliance’s coffers. This would generate revenue that could be directly reinvested in the Alliance’s development.
I think this feature would add more depth to the management of the Agreements.
I find it tedious to have nothing else to do when you’re president (apart from constantly looking for new members).
What do you think?
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Radio |
45h agoThe idea of finding other uses for the money from transfer deals is an interesting one; however, suggesting that bonuses be allocated via the training centre risks tempting some people to ‘optimise’ the system.
As for the other facilities you mention, the risk is that this could lead, for example, to an infirmary that is better equipped than those of certain managers, and the development of a system for transferring players via the agreement in order to treat them more effectively there. I think this deserves further consideration, even though the basic idea is, as mentioned above, an interesting one.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Lebaygue |
2 days agoNo more room for deals… that seems a bit complicated to me, given that they’re already trying to call the shots throughout the whole game.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Blagoje Vidinic |
41h agoMerci de rester constructif au lieu de dénigrer l'avis d'un manager.
3 more replies
sora02 |
41h agoC’est vrai que le commentaire de base l’était.
Blagoje Vidinic |
41h agoPlus que le tien et avec la différence notable de ne pas te dénigrer mais je peux me tromper.
sora02 |
41h agoNo, that’s true; rather than disparaging people individually, he disparaged a larger number of them.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Dudepike |
40h agoAs mentioned above, finding one (or more) genuinely useful purposes for the money from an alliance would be a positive development. The idea of the stadium is interesting, but ultimately we’ll end up back at square one once the alliance reaches the maximum level of its stadium. The money generated by the infrastructure will once again be accumulated and will no longer serve any purpose...
It would indeed be nice to have real benefits from the alliance funds, but I think it’s going to be difficult to find any.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
