Fred16 |

4h ago

Good evening, I'd like to explain that some agreements have 2 or more groups. And for several seasons they have reversed the levels.
The nome x 1 agreement plays at level 4 and the nome x 2 agreement plays at level 3. There's nothing very logical about that, because in sport it's the team 1 that plays at the highest level and the team 2 at the lower level. If team 1 goes down and team 2 is just above the lower level, it directly engenders team 2 at the level below. That would seem more logical to me. With kind regards


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Rull43 |

2h ago

Nothing understood 😅


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

jul068 |

2h ago

I think he's talking about LPA 1, which is in D4 of the agreements (the same division as his agreement), while LPA2 is in D3.
Not a very common situation but I don't think it's deliberate.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Rull43 |

2h ago

jul068: Je pense qu’il parle de la LPA 1 qui est en D4 des ententes ( même division que son entente) alors que la LPA2 est en D3.
Pas très courant comme situation mais je ne pense pas que ce soit voulu

Ok yes it's 2 agreements, I had already seen, it shows a great quality of agreement management 🤫


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

zejl |

55 min ago

Perhaps we should explain to the young players that they can transfer members (ideally at the start of the season).


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message