Rull43 |

2 month ago

Hello aymeric and vfiens,
I know that this has already been addressed, perhaps in a different way. I think a lot of people are trying their luck in the U17 tournament, which is great fun. Nothing against the lottery

On the other hand, when you don't have a junior, you get spectators... spectators that I lost straight away after the 1st defeat.

I'd prefer like +1% in physics like the tournament in the forest. I'm obviously speaking on my own behalf.
Or something new?

What do you think?


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Lebaygue |

2 month ago

There would be no connection between a gain in physics and an U17 tournament... At the very least, there should be a youngster detected at each tournament who doesn't necessarily have very good potential, a bit like the scout.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Ragen |

2 month ago

Lebaygue: Y aurait aucun rapport avec un gain en physique et un tournoi U 17...A la rigueur qu il y ait a chaque tournoi un jeune de detecté pas forcément de très bon potentiel,un peu comme le recruteur.

Yes, it's true
Best idea


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

jul068 |

2 month ago

Rull you just need to have the right info at the right time 😅.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Mouad Zeidane |

2 month ago

Exactly, it makes sense to find a young player every u17 tournament. As if the scout came back with a report. Then once in a while the exceptional 82-83 potential


Rull43 |

2 month ago

jul068: Rull il faut juste avoir les bonnes infos au bon moment 😅.

Thanks jul, mine are unreliable or I forget 😀


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Louisvingtneuf |

2 month ago

image

I'm happy with my first U17 tournament.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Socrate |

2 month ago

A warm welcome


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message