Rull43 |
2 month agoHello aymeric and vfiens,
I know that this has already been addressed, perhaps in a different way. I think a lot of people are trying their luck in the U17 tournament, which is great fun. Nothing against the lottery
On the other hand, when you don't have a junior, you get spectators... spectators that I lost straight away after the 1st defeat.
I'd prefer like +1% in physics like the tournament in the forest. I'm obviously speaking on my own behalf.
Or something new?
What do you think?
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Lebaygue |
2 month agoThere would be no connection between a gain in physics and an U17 tournament... At the very least, there should be a youngster detected at each tournament who doesn't necessarily have very good potential, a bit like the scout.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Ragen |
2 month agoLebaygue: Y aurait aucun rapport avec un gain en physique et un tournoi U 17...A la rigueur qu il y ait a chaque tournoi un jeune de detecté pas forcément de très bon potentiel,un peu comme le recruteur.
Yes, it's true
Best idea
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
jul068 |
2 month agoRull you just need to have the right info at the right time 😅.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Mouad Zeidane |
2 month agoExactly, it makes sense to find a young player every u17 tournament. As if the scout came back with a report. Then once in a while the exceptional 82-83 potential
Rull43 |
2 month agojul068: Rull il faut juste avoir les bonnes infos au bon moment 😅.
Thanks jul, mine are unreliable or I forget 😀
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message