Formation

Ancelloti |

23/01/2025

I think we can have two defenders but their formations must be done according to their style of play. I would like to know more about the appropriate formation for each style of play.
Like Overrun, Attack, Provoke and others. Thanks

This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Azby |

23/01/2025

No offence, but I don't really understand what you're asking.

To give you some pointers on styles:
#manual?page=38
#fr#forum?topic=161338

Depending on the style you want to use and the bonus you want to bring to your area of play, you can create a balanced formation (or not) for your team.

This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Ancelloti |

23/01/2025

I ask that a defender whose instructions are to attack or provoke be trained on the same characteristics with a defender whose instructions are to ride on the stop phases. Or each player must be trained according to the characteristics that correspond to his instruction.

This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Ancelloti Je demande un défenseur qui a comme consigne attaque ou provoquer doit être formé sur le même caractéristiques avec un défenseur qui a comme consigne monté sur…

Vrael Zendo |

24/01/2025

If you're going to provoke and attack, aren't you talking about MCs rather than defenders?

This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

4 more replies

Vrael Zendo Pour provoquer et attaquer, ce n'est pas plutôt des mdc dont tu parles et non des défenseurs?

Ancelloti |

24/01/2025

I'm talking about all positions and I've just used that as an example.
But the most important thing would be to know whether a player who is instructed to provoke should be trained in the same way as a player who provokes

This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Ancelloti Je parle de tout les postes j'ai pris celà juste pour exemple. Mais l'essentiel serait de savoir un joueur ayant la consigne provoquer doit il être formé de la…