Hello, I noticed that my players have a progression lower than the coefficient: Example, I have a player with a coefficient of 34.4, who progresses on average by 115% per day. That is 6440% per season, which gives a gain in NG of 32.2. He will therefore be behind by 2.2ng at the end of the season. So he must play 20 matches to hope to catch up... (for information the assistant coach is at 80)

Hi, For info, I have a player with a coefficient of 40.47 who takes an average of 137% in each training session. EA 81 This does not seem illogical to me.

But you forget the xp gains in matches... Progression is not only collective training unless I become stupid ^^

Not wrong, 0.24XP/match... basically a little more than 25%/match...

I know well but he talks about delay without taking into account individual training.

Then the collective training varies by a few %, you have to look at the average... like the XP of the matches, last season between the beginning and the end, there was a lot of difference for the same coefficient! But, I think, that it's the same for everyone!

Ah yes but for non-mathematicians it would be necessary to explain in a simple sentence 🤔👍

I think it's him #joueur?jid=564962&progression Afterwards, you have to see the comparison with #joueur?jid=544832&progression, #joueur?jid=556604&progression and #joueur?jid=565809&progression

Yes, that's the one. But taking into account match experience, it takes 20 matches at 90 minutes to catch up on the collective training delay. So there are a maximum of 8 matches left in the season to get ahead.

I had a quick look, they are not that late! Some came out of the CDF late... and little coefficient before, they played an average number of matches (no more), I think that if there are no injuries, if you play a sufficient number of matches, they will arrive at the end of training without delay! Afterwards, I could be wrong!

I made an Excel with their potential and the lead. Having kept my XP aside, I can clearly see that the lead is melting away.

Your player is not late. He will be at least NG83/84 at the end of training…

On the other hand, fortunately a player needs to play in order not to fall behind in his training. The collective training gain + XP gain slider moves regularly. Two years ago, players in training who trained every day and played every other day fell behind each season. A year ago, in the same conditions, they were way ahead. Today, they are getting a little ahead. As the retiree rightly said, it's the same for everyone, at time T. If Aymeric sees that there are too many 99ng players who continue to be trained, he will continue to lower the slider. If he sees that there are not enough of them, he will raise it a little.

What else!? ^^

Quantum Mathematics

You have another, even simpler way to know what his NG will be at the end of his training: You take his current margin of progression which is 30.975%. You do: 30.975% x 80 (His potential) = 24.78 NG still to be taken. That is 58.5 (His current NG) + 24.78 = 83.28 NG

Little tease ^^

I know he's not late. I agreed with you in the previous message. I'm just saying that with one training session per day, taking into account an average %, he won't take the 34.4 ng announced by his coefficient, but only 32.2 ng. And I need 20 90-minute matches for him to reach his full potential. It seems to me that in previous seasons it wasn't as "big" a gap. I just wanted to know if other managers have a similar feeling or not at all.

Yes you are right Toto Compared to the training of 3-4 seasons ago, the advantages drawn are less. Currently the surplus of NG compared to the potential at the end of training is less important. A good training will still bring something coherent and acceptable but in view of the young players of 90 NG + on the game. It is better to try to buy them than to train them 👍🏾