Jeffus tuchuss |
9 month agoI propose a vote on the new championship overhaul project, maybe that will give some visibility to the mdj. Having looked at the clubs that are impacted by this change, I think that the levels above level 3 (from 3 to 10) should express themselves. Just say in your response: FOR or AGAINST No need for explanation, we have already had the different points of view via the vforum I am counting on you to keep the topic clean without our admin topic having to clean up. Thank you in advance.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Marrik |
9 month agoBasically, what will these changes be used for?
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
michbou |
9 month agoI think that this free vote is not valid because it is not official 📋 it should be established by the mdj, in my opinion 🧯
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
myforsans |
9 month agoBlank vote. I can't be for or against until I have more details. - How many mergers to result in how many championships? - Rules for assigning clubs from merged championships to D1, D2, D3, etc.? - Fate of inactive clubs and distribution in the championships? If it has to be a shaky merger that will create discontent, I'm against it, but if it has to be a merger with new empty championships and freedom to register wherever you want for the first season, then with a breakdown of clubs by division based on the French ranking, I'm for it. So as it stands, due to lack of information, I'm voting blank.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Misha |
9 month agoLike Myforsan: blank. Because it is impossible to vote before agreeing on the new format.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Vrael Zendo |
9 month agoAgainst while waiting to have a clear format and implementation
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
dinho31 |
9 month agoFor this the MDJ can remove the inactive clubs
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
zejl |
9 month agoToo much championship for too few real active clubs a reorganization can be beneficial but good luck to find a solution that will satisfy the majority in short...I vote blank
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Flo58 |
9 month agoFor, but we need to know what changes are being proposed to us in concrete terms.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message