Salut a tous,
voici une proposition basée sur votre idée pour l'intégration d'une fonctionnalité de changement de poste dans le centre de formation de Virtuafoot.

Nous ne pouvons pas changer de poste aux jeunes du centre de formation, ce qui peut être embêtant si on cumule plusieurs jeunes qui ont le même poste.

Ma proposition serait de pouvoir changer un jeune de poste. Par exemple, transformer un ATD en ATC ou ATG ou bien un MDG en MDD (à voir si on garde par ligne ou si un DF peut se transformer en DL par exemple). Il pourrait y avoir un malus de quelques % pour éviter les abus sur les changements de poste.

merci :)

J'approuve franchement cette idée.
Pour le malus, pourquoi pas diviser par 2 par rapport en équipe senior ? 1.5%/ match , en cas de sortie ça serait déjà ça de gagner

I'm bringing up this topic again, which I think could be of interest to quite a few clubs that use the CDF

Cool I had already proposed the idea 2 months ago in cdf management, I hope that the idea will be taken into account instead of going down the drain as when I submitted it

That's how it used to be

Yes, it's possible to teach juniors new positions. However, it would be more restrictive than a simple drop in progression.

Why not make it so that to learn a new position at the cdf, the junior spends two seasons instead of one 🤔?

aymeric45: Oui c'est envisageable d'apprendre de nouveaux postes à des juniors. Par contre, ça serait plus contraingnant qu'une simple baisse de progression.

A drop in potential?

Dino_: Une baisse de potentiel ?

Yes, for example.

Nobody will do it if there's a drop in potential at stake...

aymeric45: Oui par exemple.

Why is there always a quid pro quo for something good?

Because if everything is free, nothing has any value. It's simply a question of keeping a balanced game, with an interest in having versatile players, but also for specialists in their position.

michbou: Pourquoi ne pas faire en sorte que pour apprendre un nouveau poste Au cdf, le junior mette deux saisons à la place d une 🤔 ?

That seems like a good solution to me, as a player in the CoF who doesn't play in his preferred position could see his training percentage impacted and leave the CoF later as a result.

Baisee de progression would be better, I think?

On average, a player earns between 2.5% and 3% per match, if I'm not mistaken. So if by changing position he earns 0.5%, wouldn't that be restrictive enough already?

On the other hand, if you take a young player out when he's not at 100% in his new position, would he keep those percentages or would they be reset?

No one will use the time to do so during the player's training.

Magik'jojo: Personne utilisera on a le temps de le faire pendant la formation du joueur.

how true!

A spinning wheel tic tac tic tac boom mdc attack 😁

Magik'jojo: Personne utilisera on a le temps de le faire pendant la formation du joueur.

I won't use it, that's understandable, but no one will use it, that's another story. The possibility may exist but no one will be obliged to use it, those who decide to do so despite, well that will be their choice.

An impact on potential would in fact, as Blagoje points out, be considered too serious by managers and would therefore make this possibility of making players versatile before their exit from the CDF of no interest. On the other hand, as Mich indicates, this possibility could be logically and legitimately compensated by a slower filling of the training gauge. It would also make the choice more difficult in the choice of leaving the CDF player at the age of 17 or later.