jul068 |

1h ago

image

Good evening, Aymeric

I see you’ve corrected the CDF level for this club, which benefited from the return-to-VF support programme, by changing it from level 13 to level 10. That’s only fair – thank you for taking action.
However, the juniors identified through the talent scouting programme haven’t had their potential downgraded. Will it stay that way? It’s only natural for the manager to keep the juniors he’s scouted, but not at level 13 potential.

If this is to remain the case, I’d like to highlight the risks this will entail.
For example:
I’m at level 10; I have a generation of players who’ll all be retiring within a season. It’s time to start thinking about rebuilding the next generation. After all these years on VF, I could do with a little two-month break myself. What’s more, when I come back in the middle of autumn, I’ll be able to benefit from the return support programme. In a few days, I’ll have my Level 13 CDF, or even higher (apparently up to five level gains, so potentially Level 15). I’m focusing on scouting to build a CDF with 16 juniors born in ’87, ’88 and ’89 – or even many more if I reach CDF level 15.
Not to mention the free ’90s players who’ll be the icing on the cake.
My CDF will be reset to level 10, but my juniors will still be there.

I’ve got nothing against the club in question, but if the juniors stay as they are, we’re heading straight for having to organise voluntary breaks. In fact, that’s almost certainly already the case.
The comeback programme is over-the-top: 5 level-ups, several NG 90s, bonuses!!!! It would take years of playing in normal mode to achieve similar gains.

Thank you for your attention.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

RMP-Val |

1h ago

As for the CDF players, even if the manager didn’t do it on purpose, I also think their detection potential should be reset to 10 at the CDF rather than 13.

As for the free 90NG players, why not ‘tie’ the players to the club and prevent them from being transferred? That could at least prevent any abuse or suspicion.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

jul068 |

1h ago

Exactly, that’s the solution that’s already been proposed for the NG90s on offer


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

estac |

1h ago

I think there was a bug in the programming of the additional CDF levels beyond level 10; otherwise, Aymeric wouldn’t have taken away three CDF levels from him.

All players with a potential higher than 84 in their CDF are there because of the bug.
I’ve got nothing against Mauve, but letting them off would set a precedent, and it would be difficult to penalise anyone who’s taken advantage of a bug.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message