Good evening everyone I'm not the type to complain when I lose a match but today something happened that was not normal I'll explain, my opponent in the match ie had posted a team composed of young people with 40 overall score and not present I was so I could make my 5 changes and not him the blow, my team 95 of overall mark against a team 40 of overall mark and which more is tired as not possible I had 17 chances of goal with a xg of 4 and my adversary 0,1 I would show you the screen there was 1,7 % quont faire 0 0 et c'est ce qui s'est passé j'ai jamais voulu croire toutes les personnes qui me dit que le moteur de match était foireux et que le jeu était devenu du lotto car je suis une personne qui croit pas ce qu'on lui dit mais qui croit ce quil voit et bien je peux vous assurer que aujourd'hui j'ai vue et j'en ai vrement la preuve même mon adversaire quand il s'est connecté ma mp pour me demander comment celaais possible et je n'suai pas sue quoi répondre voici la preuve mon pseudo AndrewLyon mon club Olympique Lyonnais

Is 1.7% equal to 0?

Nah, that's true, as far as I'm concerned 1.7% isn't equal to 0 and 17 opportunities don't mean a thing, so thank you.

That means you had a 95.9% chance of winning... and a 4.1% chance of not winning.
You have nothing to reproach yourself for, you maximised your chances of victory, but you weren't successful.
The match engine would be "not normal" if all matches like this ended in a win for the team that had 17 chances.

Blagoje Vidinic: Est-ce que 1.7% est égal à 0 ?

No blag(oje)ing with the match engine!

Apart from increasing the chances of scoring (the maximum xG of a chance is currently around 0.27, i.e. 1 chance in 4 of scoring), this will continue to happen.
It's a subject that's already been discussed 150 times here and nothing has changed.

For me, we should be able to stick to 10xG and have 0.9xG chances that have a 90% chance of going in when the gap is huge, such as 300 attackers vs 23 defenders in the zone, but hey.

The real question is could he have changed the result?
Or was it the match moderator who decided?
Is it really worth the waste of time or not?

Yes, I think you're right. I'm the one who's a bit paranoid about the edges, so for me I hadn't thought that 1.7% didn't equal 0, so for me, thank you for your answers.

junior: Moi la vrai question c'est aurait il pu changer le résultat ?
Ou es le modérateur de match qui a décidé ?
Es que ça vaut vraiment la perte de temps ou pas ?

The result is not written in advance.
He had a 1 in 4 chance of scoring on each occasion... And each opportunity is independent of the others, so until the last opportunity he could win.

Blagoje Vidinic: Le résultat n'est pas écrit à l'avance.
Il avait 1 chance sur 4 de marquer à chaque occasion... Et chaque occasion est indépendante des autres donc jusqu'à la dernière opportunité il pouvait gagner.

Thank you for your reply

Blagoje Vidinic: Le résultat n'est pas écrit à l'avance.
Il avait 1 chance sur 4 de marquer à chaque occasion... Et chaque occasion est indépendante des autres donc jusqu'à la dernière opportunité il pouvait gagner.

In fact, 1 in 4, whatever the opportunity you get, is probably the biggest aberration in this game.