Leguman |
2 days agoI'm well aware that suggestions for improvement, proposing a step backwards, are systematically rejected:
https://www.virtuafoot.com/#forum?topic=146720
When I discovered VirtruaFoot in the summer of 2007, the seasons were 42 days long ...
But above all, a transferred or loaned player had to stay at his club for a minimum of 7 days.
(So as not to propose a step backwards, we could imagine another period ... 8 days for example).
This information had also been addressed in an old improvement project which proposed transfer windows, as in reality. (I haven't managed to find this topic again)
[Argumentation[/b]:
1/ To make the game a bit more realistic:
It's not normal for a player to potentially play for an unlimited number of clubs in a season. The only thing holding back the number of transfers is the current taxation system.
There is no time limit: taken to the extreme, or even to the absurd, you could take a free player and, in a sort of challenge, transfer him to every club in the game in 24 hours.
A kind of human chain of solidarity ... ^^
If we assume that a 56-day season represents a 365-day calendar year, a 7-day "block" in the same club would represent a period of 45 virtual days.
Of course, we're not going to use half the season, even if that would be the most realistic, because it's all a game.
2/ Of course, the reason why In Game is being proposed at the moment (with the deregulation of market prices) is also to make it easier for the anti-cheating admins.
It would, I suppose, make the observation of player movements 'more digestible'.
It's also conceivable that it could prevent the optimisation of loopholes, such as the event that gives you 1 stamina point at the start of the season (mentioned in the bug section); however, I don't know exactly how long it will be available (7 days ... more?).
I invite the various managers, and in particular those who are the most expert in the various mechanisms of the game, to come and debate in a calm, benevolent manner and in the common interest of ALL virtua-managers[/b], ignoring the passions generated by the management of their club or their agreements.
I would also like to thank you in advance for taking part in this subject, in accordance with the rules in the << Suggestions for Improvement section (https://www.virtuafoot.com/#forum?topic=146720): no barbs or pointless posts, just be relevant.
If you're more FOR, as always you can "like" / thumbs up this topic.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Leguman |
2 days agoIf you're AGAINST it, you can "like" it / thumbs up HERE. =>
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Jeffus tuchuss |
2 days agoIt was proposed to the mdj on the Channel admin not to return for 15 days ..... 2 weeks ago
The course remains visible for 14 days.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
jul068 |
2 days agoJeffus tuchuss: Il a été proposé au mdj sur le Channel admin un non retour pendant 15 jours …..il y a 2 semaines
Le stage reste visible 14 jours.
Communication MDJ / Admins.... everything is going perfectly well
@zeus you still don't understand why we're asking for official intervention from the MDJ?
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Zeus |
2 days agojul068: La communication MDJ / Admins.... tout va parfaitement bien
@zeus tu ne comprends toujours pas pourquoi on demande une intervention officielle du MDJ?
No, I don't understand xD
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
OncleOink |
47h agoIt should also be technically possible to limit the number of club changes per season for each player (transfers and loans combined) to 1, 2 or 3.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
myforsans |
46h agoOncleOink: Il doit aussi être possible techniquement de bloquer, par saison, le nombre de changements de clubs pour chaque joueur (transferts et prêts cumulés) à 1, 2 ou 3.
1 No, otherwise there would be no more transfers, but a maximum of 3 clubs in a season, i.e. 2 clubs more than the original club, would not be bad, i.e. a maximum of 2 transfers or 2 loans or 1 and 1, obviously IS and federation loans would not count.
This would be consistent with reality and would prevent or at least limit certain frauds that are difficult to control, such as loans to treat a player in a better infirmary, fictitious sales to transport a donation of money, to combine 2 physical preparation courses etc...
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
seblelionnais |
41h agomyforsans: 1 non, sinon il n'a plus de transferts, mais 3 clubs max dans une saison c'est à dire 2 clubs de plus que le club d'origine serait pas mal c'est à dire maximum 2 transferts ou 2 prêts ou 1 et 1, évidemment les prêts IS et fédérations ne compteraient pas.
Ça serait cohérent avec la réalité et empêcherait ou au moins limiterait certaines fraudes peu contrôlables du genre prêt pour soigner un joueur dans une meilleure infirmerie, vente fictive pour transporter un don d'argent, pour cumuler 2 sta...
Mwais not convinced...
It's not very consistent with the reality that an attacking midfielder has 1 speed... So we can "do without" these limitations.
And for some, it's the only way to make a bit of cash.
The market has been liberalised, so let's make the most of it. But we still have players with communist desires in the game ^^.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
