Aymeric has changed the transfer rules in Virtua Foot Manager. There's now no minimum or maximum price for buying or selling a player, so everyone can do as they please. As a result, this opens up a new possibility for trusted clubs: instead of making a classic loan limited to 6 players for 56 days (one season), you can sell the player at the price of the training premium, let him train quietly at the friendly club, then get him back for free or for a symbolic price at the end. It's more flexible, simpler and gets round the loan limit. Of course, it's based on trust, so everyone has to respect the deal, but if you play the game, it's good for everyone.

Now you can form more than 6 players in training at home, that's a clear message and it's feasible.

Great, that means you can, and I quote, "get round the limit". That's great news!

What's in it for the club training your player?

Clearly, the limit of 6 loans maximum becomes null and void if you trust your partner.
Go to show the consequences of this incomprehensible decision

Yes, we can do away with the loan limit.
Or put in rules. But this is the new VF, I'm free, I'm free.

I sell free to 10 million, contact me by mp thank you

It is only the amount of the transfer having more limit which was changed, if not the disguised loans are always prohibited on the game

The limit on loans is still valid and has not been changed.

bluethunders26: C est que le montant des transfert en ayant plus de limite qui a était changer , sinon le prêts déguisée sont toujours interdit sur le jeu

La limite qu il y a sur les prêts est toujours d actualité et a pas était changer

But, blue, how would you characterise that?
What defines a "disguised loan"?
At a pinch, if you have a PM to prove it, but otherwise? Because you can do that for 2-3 seasons, and at the end of it all, you just buy the player back. There's nothing to show that it was a loan.

The only risk is for the lender, because he could be betrayed, and he'd have no one to defend him. The 'receiver' would be in the clear if he decided to keep the player once he'd finished training, because he'd be the legal owner... (although there is a written rule regarding commitments, so you'll have to study it).

It's often said that the big clubs have an advantage and that they have access to shenanigans (which is completely untrue), but in this case, yes, it clearly opens a door. You can put a youngster through 3-4 trusted clubs and lose the source fairly quickly. Good luck proving that it was a disguised loan.

It's not the only door it opens, by the way.

It's not easy to talk about pre-disguised training in this case because you keep the player for several seasons training him and at the end you sell him back to his quiet owner for the training premium.
There are big clubs who have their trusted trainers and that's what this method could be based on, which is by far a justifiable error given the new rules.

This "subtle" idea of making loans disguised as sales provides another example of the fact that the main consequence of this reform of transfer pricing will be :
1°) to favour large cartels which will be able to take advantage of the new possibilities offered by this reform on an "industrial scale" and not like small cartels which will only be able to do so on a "small-scale".
2°) encourage the creation of multi-accounts or, what amounts to more or less the same thing, the creation of "safe haven" or "safe deposit box" clubs.

That wasn't the point!

myforsans: Cette "subtile" idée soulevée de faire des prêts déguisés en vente apporte un nouvel exemple du fait que cette réforme des prix sur les transferts va avoir comme principale conséquence :
1°) de favoriser les grosses ententes qui pourront profiter des nouvelles possibilités de cette réfome à "échelle industrielle" et pas comme des petites ententes qui ne pourront le faire qu'à "échelle artisanale"
2°) d'inciter à la création de multi-comptes ou bien ce qui revient à peu près au même à la créat...

Yes, there may be clubs in large agreements that will take care of the training of players from the agreement, they may have 22 players to train and 6 per normal meadow in addition there is not a set diverted on the meadow but it is a clear way open by the new rules on transfer. So the possibility is clearly open there are no disguised pre I do not know how they are explained in this context 😂😎.