Hello,
Is it or is it not allowed to play with 5 players on the forward line?

If it is allowed, is it possible to fix the bug that prevents 5 players from lining up?
If it's not allowed, is it possible to block the change of position when there are already 4 attackers, which allows the number to be increased to 5? Or what should the admins do about this flaw?

I'll find out more :)

You put 1 atc or asc mdc, put it in the 11 and put it back in its attacking position.
On the other hand, it's atd/atg/2 atc max, so you need asc or acd/asg.

Yes, that's the crux of the problem.

Either it's authorised and it's a bug that needs fixing.
Or it's not, and so there's a loophole because it can be done. That's the point of my question.

I asked the question some time ago, and the answer was open to interpretation.

@michbou, do you have any news?

Hello
Alas 🥺 no

It looks like an attacking triangle

Ok

Yes, I asked that question and I'd really like to know too.

If you block the 5 attacking players, you have to block the 5 defenders or the 5 midfielders.

Frankly, I don't see the problem with 5 defenders or 5 strikers, given that we can have 5 midfielders. Personally, I play with 3 5 2, and sometimes during a match, especially at the end, I play with 5 strikers or 5 defenders.

Debate closed. The MDJ blocked the possibility of playing with 5 strikers.
In short, you score and then switch to a 5-5-0 formation by squeezing your buttocks together, and logically, you're through.
Some great matches ahead.
You'll still have to explain to me why 5 defenders is a yes, 5 midfielders is a yes, 0 strikers is a yes too. But 5 strikers is a no....

It doesn't really matter. Well, no, we can debate it if we like.

but at least the desired impossibility is blocked.

Ridiculous. The game has just regressed. In addition to everything we're seeing at the moment, it's hard to be enthusiastic about the future. Viruafoot is supposed to be entertaining through its game play, not through verbal jousting to settle disputes that 90% of players don't care about.

I think that it was a bug as you could only have 5 forwards by changing position of one midfielder or defender and if you had 5 forwards you couldn't replace 1 forward with another forward (even in the exact same position), but I'm not sure that I fully agree with the "fix", i.e. I'm not the fan of this restrictions (even though I've never played with 5 forwards, except for some friendlies last season because of the affinity).

You have to leave room for flexibility! That's what makes the game interesting! The same goes for marking. I didn't use it, but it was a challenge.

4 years of vf 4 years of being able to do it without really using it

I know, but I'm going to change that in New le boss précisé.
The 99% discovered and personally I do not find very respectful towards the community of this game.
But that's just my opinion.

5 attackers are forbidden, ok, but 5 pure attackers (ATG-ATC-ATG). However, you can have a mix of 5 attackers and support attackers?

That was just for information. I don't see anything shocking in seeing a system with 2 or 3 top strikers and 2 or 3 support strikers across the whole width of the pitch to try and score when there's nothing left but to go for it. Personally, if I use 3 strikers, that's the maximum, but I don't find that absurd, and what's more, the ascenders still have a slight impact on the midfield.

you know, as long as it's not written in the "official" rules, the main thing is to win (not in my case) :p

To grate or not to grate 🙉🙊🙈

UP 🤩

and down!