Micky |
3 month agoHello,
If there is a tie for the IE ranking (which is the case in D3), what is the ranking criterion?
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
bluethunders26 |
3 month agoHaving looked at the 2 agreements I would say the number of times the 10 ie are all played (you have 5-6 managers who made the 10 ie, the other agreement their manager with the most ie played are at 9)
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
guantanamera |
3 month agoThere was a time when the ID of the agreement divided them
Clearly: the oldest agreement is in front
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Micky |
3 month agoguantanamera: Il fut un temps où l'ID de l'entente les departageait
En clair: l'entente la plus ancienne est devant
Yes, that's what I thought too... the agreement UID was decisive... the oldest agreement went first. Obviously that has changed... or maybe the update will come later!
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Blagoje Vidinic |
3 month agoFor clubs, it's a draw... perhaps it's the same for associations.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
lens59 |
3 month agomatt64 |
3 month agoThat was the date when the agreement was created, yes, but perhaps that has changed
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
OMstar83 |
3 month agoIt would be logical for seniority not to be a ranking criterion in any case.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
lens59 |
3 month agoWe missed out on a climb because of a few months' seniority
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
redbull77 |
3 month agogood evening
the ratio of the 2 ententes is the same for the ie matches but the ratio of the eco is superior because the eco have not played any inter selections matches, it is very possible that this is the reason for the 3rd and 4th places
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message