Skyred |
31/12/2024Good evening everyone, I hope you're all well this New Year's Eve. For my part, I'd like to mention a point in the rules that annoys me enormously. I've disagreed with several admins who tell me that a 70NG player with badly distributed points and a 95NG player have the same value. This rule really needs to be changed because it really makes NO SENSE. In no way can these two profiles have the same value!!!!! In short, I wish you all a very good evening and a happy new year!
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Morten34 |
31/12/2024Logic... you take an NG 70 player who is poorly distributed, you reallocate his carac points to the VF Store and you get an NG 95 player.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Ancelloti |
31/12/2024Good evening, could we have the regulation in question
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Skyred |
31/12/2024As you say, you have to go through the store to get the same NG^^ so I'm sorry but this point in the rules is absurd. Put the two players up for auction or on a list and you'll see which one will start at a much higher price^^
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Morten34 |
31/12/2024It's precisely to avoid abuse that we have this point of regulation.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Wissam.Mn |
31/12/2024A player marking speed/technique/passing with 99 in each characteristic will cost much less than a normal 99g
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Morten34 |
31/12/2024But if you reallocate his carac points via the store, you'll make him an NG 99, which clearly shows that they're of equal value. Incidentally, transfers are regularly cancelled after being reallocated. Otherwise, the transfer market is meaningless. How can you then justify the fact that a reallocated NG 99 was sold for 10 M when all the other equivalent NG 99s were sold for 70 M, for example?
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
sora02 |
31/12/2024You were less annoyed when there was the flurry of 45s from potential to 99 NGs not reallocated last July/August.
This flock that several managers rushed to see in order to rip off the youngsters arriving for 5m.
But I haven't seen any transfers cancelled.
Word to the wise
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
2 more replies
Morten34 |
31/12/2024You never call a truce... Instead of verbally abusing us on New Year's Eve, you would have asked nicely why, that would have been better. But courtesy can't be bought... If these transfers haven't been cancelled, it's because there's a reason, believe me. It was an express instruction from Aymeric for these players. It's his game, he decides, but certainly not me or you. I wish you all the best for the future.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
|
31/12/2024An event announced by Aymeric during a voice. The admins didn't know about it and it was complicated for them.
Stop thinking that they're amused by sanctioning you.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Wissam.Mn |
31/12/2024We pay with real money the reallocation at the end of the day
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Morten34 |
31/12/2024Yes, but the VF STORE exists and we have to take that into account.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
|
31/12/2024hello
deja bonne fin d'annee a toutes et tous
morten c'est 1sujet que j'avais deja aborde en disant que votre tableau n'est pas juste et qu'il crame le marché des transferts tout comme le style de jeux.
D'apres ce tableau, 1billet de 10eur irl vaut donc la meme chose que 30m vf(, grosso modo c'est ca.
i've already shown you several times that you can't use the vf store as an example because the purchase price differs according to the level of the players on the store, so if you use the store in your calculations you also need to use the levels of the players on the table.
1niv1 will pay 10m and a few stars
1niv2 will pay 30m ext ext
these tables are obsolete morten
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Wissam.Mn |
31/12/2024It's an opinion, I won't get into a debate about it
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Arnoldo09 |
31/12/2024So a 24-year-old with 20pts in 10 features will cost as much as a 24-year-old 99ng? And yet you have to pay 10 quid to catch up... not very coherent or fair...
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
|
31/12/2024I'm a bit grumpy about it, but the low margin is still easily accessible. Just take the number of pts once redistributed and take the low margin. These are still crazy opportunities. Don't be too greedy
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Socrate |
31/12/2024It's important to distinguish between "it will be worth the same price" and "it can't be sold/bought for the same price"
The table gives us a value that we can easily go as far as -50% or +50%
So if, according to Arnoldo's or Wissam's example, a well-established 24 year old 99 NG is "worth 60M" according to the settlement table.
We can easily buy/sell our Marquage 99 - style 99 at 30M or our player with 20 points everywhere to be reallocated also at 30M
So I can understand why you think that these different types of player, when they have to go through the Vfstore, can't be bought or sold at the same price.
However, they have the same value because they have the same number of points.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
lens59 |
31/12/2024pieutte |
31/12/2024Hi afterwards, at the time there were cdf players who came out well ahead before being reallocated. And we weren't sold for that much.
Some were nerfed, others not. Why now should reallocated players be counted at the same value as better trained players?
image](https://i.imgur.com/6ly6J63.jpeg)
It still exists by the way.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Socrate |
31/12/2024Some people really do have a long memory.
Before does not start at the same time for everyone.
Happy New Year to you all 🥂
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Plarchios |
01/01/2025It's a good thing this rule exists, because the VF store was originally set up to encourage players to put money into VF.
This is already the case with the players in the store, so let's not go any further. This rule is fine.
You can have a 50% discount, that's fine.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message