Hi, I couldn't find the post about why you can't line up a 5-5-0?
Or is it just an IS rule?
Without a striker means the bus behind and total domination of the midfield.
So without a defender a 0-5-5 should have the same consequences, right?

It's just a VF Cup rule.

So it's not really sporting

0-5-5 is not as anti-game as 5-5-0

But how can the game accept a 5-5-0 when it refuses to

For me the 2 are anti game from the moment he plays this tactic all the match and not to keep or try to score to equalize or win at the end. I've been on the receiving end of 0-5-5 tonight and I've lost on penalties, so win or lose that's not the problem. The problem is that the match engine doesn't punish a team that plays without a defender, it's crazy. The 5-5-0 is something else again because you can play a whole match like that against a stronger team. To hold a 0-0. Après pour moi le 0-5-5 est une faille dy jeux et c'est flippant voyant que sa fonctionne tout le monde vas y mettre imagine vf comme sa. In short, I'm personally shocked by it. And if I'd won tonight I'd have said the same thing. I've talked about it with Socrate, and yes, it's not easy, you have to adapt, etc., but really, 0-5-5 is the first time I've had to deal with it, and it's very sad

I don't think I've been too bad at the tab, I've managed to adapt, but I'll say it, it's not the result that makes me say that, after all, you're right, but once I've understood how to play it, I'd be surprised if it did the same thing again. I'm only talking in terms of my own principles. If I'm the only one who doesn't think it's normal, then yes, I need to move on and get ready to play more and more against this kind of tactic. It just doesn't suit me

The problem that makes me react is that everyone wants to make their rules according to their morals or their way of seeing things. There are already too many rules in this game.
5 5 0 can be legitimate and the opposite too.
There are guys who play with 600 in the middle and that's no more an abuse than anything else.

Yes, that's why I'm saying it's my opinion. Then what rule are you talking about? I'm not necessarily talking about setting rules, I'm talking about the engine of a match that shits playing without a defender, I really don't understand. After that, as I said, I'll adapt, but I'm very concerned about it

The match engine doesn't see match compositions. It just takes into account the statistics, your opponent has played on the imbalance and the mdm has been kind to him. You should have adjusted your defence or midfield quickly. If you'd had an extra midfielder instead of a striker, you'd surely have blown them away. The game doesn't see the players, it sees the game as a whole 😉

Especially as 5-5-0 is no guarantee of keeping a score. I've always conceded quicker that way than when not playing 5-5-0 ^^

It's all a false debate: the 5-5-0 approach to concreting or the 0-5-5 approach to attacking at full stretch no longer means much these days with the collective and individual instructions.
We can easily go over 400 in defence with 0 defenders and over 400 in attack with 0 attackers.
To put it plainly, the supposed prohibitions that could be imposed (or that still persist for the rules of IS matches) no longer make any sense today.

Unbalanced is a weak word in my opinion lol

What also begs the question is the fact that, basically, you can't line up a 0-5-5 team directly in the tactics tab. You have to line up a player in midfield or defence and then change his position to allow you to line up 5 strikers.

I didn't say anything about a rule. I'm saying that the game, factually, prevents such a composition from being lined up in the first place. So it just needs to be more consistent:

• either you can line up 5 strikers in the tactical tab from the start. Personally, I have nothing against that.
• or you can't field 5 strikers at any time, in the same way that it's already impossible to field more than 5 midfielders or 5 defenders via the changes.

But I don't think that should remain an insider's 'secret'.

everyone plays with their weapons it's just a game why favour the big teams all for the win the law of the strongest is not always the best

already, when we play against abandoned clubs, the stats are higher than my team. I'm forced to use the normal set point, but no matter how many times I change the set point, the abandoned club is superior