Kynlux |

4 month ago

Hello everyone,
I wanted to know if there was any real interest in sending so staff to the internship? Is the maximum score 99 (like for players)?
How long does a course last? Does age have an impact (as it does for players)? Do all courses cost €1.2m (regardless of position or level)?
For those of you who have the beginnings of answers, thank you in advance


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

michbou |

4 month ago

You get 1 point for each course, which lasts a week
For the level it depends on your level of club it seems to me


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Blagoje Vidinic |

4 month ago
The maximum skill attainable is club level x 9, i.e. 90 for a level 10, 81 for a level 9, etc.
The cost is the same for all courses, whatever the staff position.
A 90-skill staff will be more efficient than an 80-skill staff, just as an 80-skill staff will be more efficient than a 70-skill staff.

This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Ancelloti |

4 month ago

I've seen several subjects developed on your question and several level 10 clubs say that doing this thing is an unnecessary waste of money.
This subject was recently discussed and we are following the elders


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Morten34 |

4 month ago

No, it's not a waste of money. A 90-skill recruiter will bring you better young people than an 80-skill recruiter. I've experienced it myself. The same goes for a physiotherapist or an assistant coach. The only thing that can be said is that there's not a huge difference between a staff with skill level 80 and a staff with skill level 90. So it's not the first place to invest your money. But at a later stage, it can be useful.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Bastoun_34 |

4 month ago

Above all, it depends on how you put your team together: if you buy players who are already trained, it's certainly less useful to have a top coach and recruiter than if you put together a team entirely from your CdF.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

hazard14 |

4 month ago

You must be one of the few people to see the difference between rj80 and 90. In my case and those I know, I don't see any difference and I almost never have a pot over 70


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Blagoje Vidinic |

4 month ago

hazard14: Tu dois être un des rares à voir la différence entre en rj80 et 90 . Pour mon cas et ceux que je connais je ne vois aucune différence et j'ai quasi jamais de pot supérieur à 70

So why does everyone prefer to have an RJ 80 rather than a 70?


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

hazard14 |

4 month ago

Well, I'm asking because personally I tell everyone in my agreement that going from 80 to 90 was pointless and we all agree on that


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Brutus |

4 month ago

As far as I'm concerned :

  • An EA 90 saves a few % on the big coefficients compared to an EA 80... very little on lesser coefficients but over 5 to 7 seasons of training, it's always a few points more..
  • RJ 90 brings me a better pot than an RJ 80... in about 2 months, already a pot 85 at the CDF (I came back in May so in 4 months the highest pot 75 with the 80)
  • I wanted to test the physio in 90 but before that it was around 21 hours recovery/day... I'm at 83 and around 20 hours a day so I don't know if it's worth going to 90 now
  • As for the RM and DCTV, well, I don't really care, so I'll have to check with those who've tested it!
  • For the gardener, at 90, the grass is greener in my stadium... but what's the point?
  • For the barman, at 90, the cocktails clink nicely but, well, never mind!

++ Merry Christmas!


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

hazard14 |

4 month ago

Apparently the algorithm must be very different depending on the club


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Bastoun_34 |

4 month ago

Brutus: De mon côté :

  • UN EA 90 fait gagné qques % sur les gros coef en comparaison à un EA 80... très peu sur des coef moindres mais sur 5 à 7 saisons de formation, c'est tjs qques pts en +
  • RJ 90 me ramène de meilleur pot. qu'un RJ 80... en environ 2 mois, déjà un pot 85 au CDF (je suis revenu en mai donc en 4 mois le + haut pot 75 avec le 80)
  • J'avais envie de tester le kiné en 90 mais avant c'était environ 21h de récup/jour... je suis à 83 et 20h, environ, par jour donc là, je ne sa

For the kiné 90, it marks -20h ms in truth, it's a bit more, like 20h and 5 min (true^^)


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Drosko |

4 month ago

For my part with a Recruiter 90 and after a very long crossing of the desert :

  • 16 days ago: pot 80
  • 25 days ago: pot 81
  • 32 days ago: pot 81
  • 52 days ago: pot 81
  • 63 days ago: pot 83
    Either a real change, or the Recruiter's effect, or a stroke of luck!

This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Clamsii |

4 month ago

Drosko: Pour ma part avec un Recruteur 90 et après une très longue traversée du désert :

  • Il y a 16 jours : pot 80
  • Il y a 25 jours : pot 81
  • Il y a 32 jours : pot 81
  • Il y a 52 jours : pot 81
  • Il y a 63 jours : pot 83
    Soit un réel changement, soit l'effet du Recruteur, soit un coup de bol!

A stroke of luck ^^


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Galywat |

4 month ago

Let's just say that it's expensive to invest in apprenticeships. It's much better to think ahead and take on a player with great potential several seasons in advance so that you can convert him at the end of his career. You'll also be able to take advantage of the player.

It's just that internships aren't very profitable financially speaking. You can do them, you'll optimise everything (training, detection by trainer), but really on micro percentages, so only do them if your resources allow, don't expect to make a return on the investment before many seasons, if you do these courses, do them accordingly on staffs that are not very old.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Brutus |

4 month ago

Bastoun_34: Pour le kiné 90, ça marque -20h ms en vérité, c'est poil plus, genre 20h et 5 min (véridique^^)

Well, to be precise, and if I'm not mistaken, a physio 83: 19:36


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

lens59 |

4 month ago

80 = 19 h so I don't know the cost of the course but is adding 3 for a 36mln difference really worth it?


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

michbou |

4 month ago

1million 2 the course


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Brutus |

4 month ago

That's why I stopped at 83... then when I find out (thanks to Bastoun) that 90 = 20:05... well, it doesn't make me want to do any more courses!

And a small correction, it's not a 75 pot but 79 (during the 4 months), but memory isn't what it used to be!


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Sun's |

4 month ago

Drosko: Pour ma part avec un Recruteur 90 et après une très longue traversée du désert :

  • Il y a 16 jours : pot 80
  • Il y a 25 jours : pot 81
  • Il y a 32 jours : pot 81
  • Il y a 52 jours : pot 81
  • Il y a 63 jours : pot 83
    Soit un réel changement, soit l'effet du Recruteur, soit un coup de bol!

I tell myself that my cdf8 must be profitable when I see that, last season 79 and this one 78


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

spoupou |

4 month ago

Physiotherapy 90 reduces an injury by 19:56 if I count correctly
Before
image](https://i.imgur.com/Spkwt7l.jpeg)
After
image


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Blagoje Vidinic |

4 month ago

Brutus: Ben pour être précis et si je ne me plante pas, un kiné 83 : 19h36

Level 10 infirmary and 82 physio: reduction from 28/12, 2.23pm to 27/12, 6.51pm, i.e. 7.32pm


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Blagoje Vidinic |

4 month ago

michbou: 1million 2 le stage

1.3 M to go from 84 to 85.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

michbou |

4 month ago

Ah that had to increase (inflation)
🤔


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Blagoje Vidinic |

4 month ago

From 80 to 84, it's 1.2M, then 1.3M and from 89 to 90, it's 1.4M.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Mok's |

3 month ago
> **Blagoje Vidinic**: La compétence maximale atteignable est niveau du club x 9, soit 90 pour un niveau 10, 81 pour un niveau 9, etc.
> Le coût est identique pour tous les stages quel que soit le poste du staff.
> Un staff compétence 90 sera plus efficace qu'un staff 80 de la même manière qu'un staff 80 sera plus efficace qu'un staff 70.

What is the maximum skill level that can be achieved during a training course or retraining?
So there is no staff above 90?

This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Blagoje Vidinic |

3 month ago

No, there are no staff with a skill level higher than 90.
The conversion skill corresponds to the player's potential (after at least 3 seasons of seniority).


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message