Demi-cerveau |

6 month ago

It's a fairly simple project, which would give the federations' selectors easy visual control over the clubs from which their selected players come.

At present, a federation that allocates a selection bonus can see after each match which club each player comes from. Here's an example.
image](https://i.imgur.com/qG3UbAU.jpeg)

On the other hand, for federations where no bonus is allocated, nothing appears in the finance tab. Here is an example.
image

For those unfamiliar with the federations module, it's important to understand that there's no indication of which club the selected player comes from, when the selection is made or when it arrives. So the only solution for these selectors is to look at each match to see which club each player comes from, individually, if they want to be sure of playing in accordance with the rules. In practice, this borders on the unmanageable.

I would therefore like a 'selection' line with an amount of 0 to appear at each match for each player if the amount of the bonus is 0. This was the case before. This would make it much easier for every coach and every president (and every administrator who so wishes) to check that the team was complying with the rules for a given match.

Enjoy the game!


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

k3vin59218 |

6 month ago

I totally agree with you
With that, the rules will normally be respected
It's true that having to look at which club a player comes from and which agreement is sometimes an uphill battle


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Socrate |

6 month ago

🫱🏾‍🫲🏼


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Magik'jojo |

6 month ago

An excellent idea. I even think that it should be possible to limit the number of players to 5 agreements in the add player tab. There is already a ban in place for two players from the same club, so why not add a formula in the database if the number of players exceeds 5 to block access to another player from the same agreement. (Adding sister agreements, of course). I think that would control abuse much better, without an admin having to take action.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Demi-cerveau |

6 month ago

I agree with you about the initial set-up. Except that once the squad has been put together, 3 transfers and you're out of line, even though you haven't touched anything. It's the same thing with two players from the same club: you can't add 2 players from the same club. On the other hand, with one player selected, I can buy 3 others who are already in the federation, and at the next match the coach, in all good faith, will take 4 players ... So, ideally, you need both: a limit when you draw up the list AND a check afterwards.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

vf:fed:au |

6 month ago

Yes, it's true that transfers aren't easy.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

myforsans |

6 month ago

It's also true that when selectors have almost 40 players selected for their federations, that's when it becomes unmanageable not to exceed 5 players per agreement.
Once and for all, the programme that manages the federations should limit the number of players that can be selected to 20 or 22, and once the ceiling has been reached, it should be impossible to add a player until one has been withdrawn

Is it reasonable to select 40 players when these same coaches don't even watch their matches and play their 90 minutes with 11 players?
40 - 11 = 29 extra players is just a way of giving a small bonus to friends and getting the same friends' players to look good.
After that, we shouldn't be surprised that the rules aren't respected and that some coaches use 9 or 10 players from their team.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Demi-cerveau |

6 month ago

myforsans: Il est vrai aussi que quand des sélectionneurs montent à près de 40 joueurs sélectionnés pour leurs fédérations c'est là que ça devient ingérable pour pas dépasser les 5 joueurs par entente.
Il faudrait une fois pour toutes que le programme qui gère les fédérations bloque à 20 ou 22 joueurs le nombre de sélectionnés possibles et que une fois atteint le plafond ça bloque pour ajouter un joueur tant qu'on n'en a pas retiré un

Est-ce raisonnable de sélectionner 40 joueurs alors

I once knew a club that had 40 players under contract when the limit set by the game was 32 ... That didn't bother you as much, I think.

After that, I'm going to agree with you that the number of players in the national team should be limited, to around 26-27-28 players in my opinion. However, at the time the limit was introduced (and it was easier to control your selection), an admin told me that even if the limit was set at 5 per agreement, you should only take 4, to avoid the risk of being out of line following a transfer. So there is a problem.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message