iMcCarthy77 |
19/09/2024Hi someone knows what are the characteristics taken into account to make the central defenders contribute to "go up on set pieces" thank you
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Kirikou |
19/09/2024iMcCarthy77 |
19/09/2024iMcCarthy77 |
19/09/2024Kirikou |
19/09/2024To answer your question, maybe I didn't understand...
I apologize then for coming to pollute your post
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
iMcCarthy77 |
19/09/2024No worries.. I'm just trying to find out what the training characteristics are to win a maximum of offensive points on defenders who go up on set pieces, it's an option that I think is very interesting but not used much on the game before a few years ago, you had to train your defenders in attack but I don't remember the training to follow anymore
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Kirikou |
19/09/2024Based on a particular style?
Otherwise I think that the new data displayed during the match explain everything.
For a DFC to go up to the stopped phase, there are only 2 factors
1- The overall score
2- Over-training according to style.
I think that if he trains in attack, it's a waste compared to the statistical contribution on the pitch.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Le vrai stéphanois |
19/09/2024Don't have a painting with the Holligans? 😨
Kyky is right
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Socrate |
19/09/2024Kirikou's answer was the right one, however.
To have a DFC mounted on set pieces, the repair is the one that gave you
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
iMcCarthy77 |
19/09/20243 in defence, 1 in tackles and 2 in power?
Is that distribution?
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Socrate |
19/09/2024Maybe it will be more meaningful to you with the vision of a 99 Ng player in this instruction
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
iMcCarthy77 |
19/09/2024So thanks 🤝 it's the power characteristic that gives offensive points..
Sorry Kirikou, I didn't understand your first message and I still don't 😵 💫😁 understand with Socrates' diagram, it's more readable
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Le vrai stéphanois |
20/09/20241 in tackling, 2 in power, 3 in defence... roughly 1 point in tackling, 2 in power and 3 in defence... and so on. In defence he must be 3× stronger than in tackles
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
k3vin59218 |
20/09/2024Maybe it will be clearer like this:
- it takes 3x more tackles than defense
- It takes 2x more power than tackles
On an example of 99NG it's also clear but not all players are at 99 😃
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message