Hello
I just reread the rules, I'm a little surprised by the new scales (I think it's cool that it exists though) but 25% of the bank for a strong response on a comment. That means for a guy who has 3 billion, it's 750m in sanctions.... It is even better to use a script to find free books (20%) than to respond violently to a person on the forum
I think it would be good to put a cap on sanctions. Because if I remember the last sanctions for cheating, we were much lower.

I think it would be good if the "strong" answers were not reserved only for the "poor guy" hahahaha more seriously, I think it would be good if it didn't bring more discontent in case of sanction. Because I think we should all be punished in the same way.

Is it not possible to exclude players on the forum in case of sanctionable behavior? + a financial penalty.

Lulo: Bonjour,
Je viens de relire le reglemenent, je suis un peu surpris des nouveaux barèmes (je trouve cool que ça existe par contre) mais 25% de la banque pour une réponse forte sur un commentaire. Ça veut dire pour un mec qui a 3 milliards, c'est 750m de sanction.... il est même préférable d'utiliser un script pour trouver des libres (20%) que de répondre violemment à une personne sur le forum
Je pense que ça serait bien de mettre un plafond sur les sanctions. Car si je me souviens des derniè...

see the problem the other way around, a guy at 3MM doesn't care about losing 10M if he insults someone

Good evening
Sorry but the fact of belittling, denigrating someone, lowering him to the ground is no less important than a series of numbers?? No one knows the psychological state of other players and at the moment we talk a lot about mental health, so of course you are talking about 750M out of 3 billion but it is also 2.5M for someone who I only have 10M in the bank.

Certainly a script for free for example is a big mistake, but this is only computer coding, while depending on how you talk to a person and his way of interpreting the words received can be much worse as a result irl for this person depending on his state or mood of the day (he can be sick, having suffered a rotten and misinterpreted day, having had bad news from a loved one ect ... )

Your vision can be understood but it is only a game and if everyone talks to each other correctly there will be nothing, moreover at the beginning of each violation of the rules the members are warned before having a sanction

To come back to the amount of the scale of sanctions, it is fairer to act on a percentage than a fixed sum (to take your example of 3 billion if the fine is 5 or 7.5 million it will do nothing to him at all and he will not care compared to the members who will have the same sanction but only 10-12 million in the bank)

So yes it may seem huge when there are large sums but the percentage is still the fairest way

Afterwards, as said, if the rules are respected, there will be no warnings or sanctions and everyone will play in accordance with the rules and will enjoy playing while having a better dialogue and constructive debates on the forum instead of conflict that shouldn't even be there, Of course there can be disagreements but it can be discussed without coming to talk to each other badly and badly or by sending each other spikes

The forum is a place for discussion of all kinds, which must be and remain in a good mood 😉😉

What does it mean to respond violently?
On some subjects, it is a little invective, it is not too respected, it throws barbs at each other without being too direct...
Is this type of behavior concerned? Sometimes it's said in a humorous tone and losing such a big percentage for a small "joke" would be a shame...

I still remember Dunki who lost 1 billion for having the misfortune to tell someone that he was an idiot. Not sure that the person must have had psychological problems behind it...

Anyway, to know where the border is located not to cross, a lot of people are getting close to it (I'm one of them) and I'd be a bit sad to see my bank collapse for one word too many^^

Sending spikes to delirium is one thing and it lasts 5-10 minutes. Sending spikes violently is something else and we see it with the topics that are deviated from the main discussion and where there are 3-5 or even 10 pages of attack and that the admins (before the new appointments so restricted to react) had to close the subject for it to stop

As with everything there are limits and you have to know them and when to stop, so yes the peaks for fun don't last long and the
More often are seen with: lol, mdr or smiley

In addition, and if I am not mistaken, the entire administration team is quite lenient, open to dialogue and understandable, moreover before each sanction there have been warnings.

We are all human beings behind our screens, and as said if at the time of the warning things calm down (or even explain themselves to deprive themselves of it) there will be no reason to be sanctioned, on the other hand if the attacks continue out of laughter yes the sanctions will fall after the warnings.

All this everyone knows very well and knows how to do it very well and recognize it by things, as said if everything is in RESPECT and good humor, the pleasure of playing and dialoguing will only be better and more pleasant for everyone

Close the post

Johnie Halidai: Je ferme le post

For those who have a small bank account and don't care about getting fined, there is also the possibility of blocking the account for a week or more. Something to think about Johnie...

Well perfect, I found it a bit high and potentially the door to big penalties but on the one hand if it can bring joy / respect in the forum, let's go for 25% of the bank. 🤘

bluethunders26: Bonsoir
Désoler mais le fait de rabaisser , dénigrer quelqu un , le descendre plus bas que terre est pas moins important qu une série de chiffre ?? Personnes ne connais l état psychologique des autres joueurs et a l heure actuelle on parle énormément de santé mental , alors certe tu parles de 750M sur 3 milliard mais cela fait aussi 2,5M pour quelqu un qui j as que 10M en banque .

Certes un script pour des libres par exemple est une grosse faute , mais cela n est que du codage informatique,...

I think there are positions in the government to set up these fines as a percentage!
But for the time being, you need a low value ^^ => maybe by that we should optimize?

We live in a world where everyone fights for nothing or whines for nothing... A world of jealousy people who see that their navel...
#cetaitmieuxavant
(it's not a criticism but an observation) I wouldn't want to liquidate my bank eh?😁

We can't agree on everything with everyone, but the one who gets my hair on end is the 2 or 3 managers who take a malicious pleasure in coming to throw a booger on a subject and who gloat that the subject is going to waste.
But as it is generally polite or well turned, they are almost never sanctioned, yet it is an incentive to drift from the subject that sometimes makes other managers get into trouble.
A subject I can give an opinion but not come to make innuendo or provocation even if they are generally well turned to be in line

I often tell my students, "When you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything."

It's a bit like the three filters of SOCRATES

As far as I am concerned, I am very happy with this scale, so that everyone will be treated in the same way according to the same fault. No one will be able to cry favoritism anymore.
Moreover, I do not see what there is to debate. When we make a mistake, we assume our responsibilities because we can only blame ourselves. In any case, if we enter the debate to try to negotiate, it is because somewhere we have something to reproach ourselves for. In short, it's very good and it's a very good thing done by this great team of administrators, bravo :)

Le croc: C est un peu les trois filtres de SOCRATE

Have I been called? 😏

Socrate: On m’a appelé ? 😏

Go to bed, you! 😁