Hi everyone..
This season I would like to do some tests and if some people have a contribution to make to me it would be really great...
I would like to know in terms of statistics the maximum possible and the score on the placement of short game, creative game, direct game with the score...
For example, a team that plays defensively with or without a placement, with the strategy adopted and the score (very important) against which team and what level of statistics in front of you... I'm really looking for performance on each sector of the game to see how much we can maximize them. In defense I've already seen 700 statistics... I would like to know the 800 statistics in a sector of the game are also possible in the middle and offensively. A few years ago I liked to do it to push the reflection on the match engine as much as possible (I wasn't alone) but we have become on the whole much more classic in matches, namely 4-4-2 .. 4-5-1 then less proposed the 3-5-2 which remains a classic... Thank you

Very good idea

Wissam.Mn: Très bonne idée

Your contribution is welcome if you want to do the test in friendly, inter-agreement or league during the season In the idea 😊 I will ask you to try to make a record of statistics on an area you have chosen to post the link of your match and give your opinion on what you thought of it

With the playing styles maximum rating depends a lot on the opponent. I've started a few games over the past few seasons with over 600 in midfield (probably could have been a bit higher if I put central defenders to normal instruction instead of participate in build-up), but don't remember coming close to 700+. My team can actually be decent at every playing style (hence the low overall rating for most players), but the style used always is short passing, but I can adjust to the opponent's style (change of positions or instructions) while still playing short passing.

Andre Malles: With the playing styles maximum rating depends a lot on the opponent. I've started a few games over the past few seasons with over 600 in midfield (probably could have been a bit higher if I put central defenders to normal instruction instead of participate in build-up), but don't remember coming close to 700+. My team can actually be decent at every playing style (hence the low overall rating for most players), but the style used always is short passing, but I can adjust to the opponent's style

Do you have a link of a match with 600 statistics in the middle please?

No, last time it was last season, I think it was 606, this season I had up to 590+ rating in midfield at the start of the match a couple of times with my first team in a 3-5-2 formation

#match?mid=5860668&stats&min=0

#match?mid=5852406&stats&min=0

#match?mid=5872420&stats&min=0

#match?mid=5847479&stats&min=0

#match?mid=5859387&stats&min=0

Hold for the investment style

! [image] (https://i.imgur.com/ZmmJ6lz.jpeg)

We can do better I think 😉

spoupou: On peut mieux faire je pense 😉

I confirm!
Today: 542 in defence at the start of the match, for me, with the instruction "very offensive". ^^

spoupou: On peut mieux faire je pense 😉

yes not great, fortunately you win!

reached over 600 in midfield at the start of the game (opposition had -1 or -2 bonus for short passing, they played a defensive style amd had a massive bonus there), played out a boring 0-0

#match?mid=5841999&stats&min=0

Blagoje Vidinic: Je confirme !
Aujourd'hui : 542 en défense en début de match, pour moi, avec la consigne « très offensif ». ^^

The biggest stators are at 1200 / 1250 so make almost 600 on 1/3 of the sectors.
Excuse me, but that's not nothing.
Now that the investment "specialist" tells us that he would have done better if and if and if ...
He just had to! … He didn't do it, so the one of spoupou my most "impressed" 😏

Andre Malles: reached over 600 in midfield at the start of the game (opposition had -1 or -2 bonus for short passing, they played a defensive style amd had a massive bonus there), played out a boring 0-0

#match?mid=5841999&stats&min=0

It's perfect, this diagram will be useful to me, thank you very much ☺️

Socrate: Tiens pour le style placement

#match?mid=5836851

Oh great!! Thank you So'... We can see that maximizing your defense can be effective in key games

Indeed because in front 524 in attack all the same on the capture

It was an interesting challenge. Even though I lost, I had 6 chances against a 600-man defence the whole game. Only 1 conceded. I think I did the job. Sometimes it's not enough:)

! [image] (https://i.imgur.com/1viT6Vh.jpeg) more than 700 defensive stats on this match for our friend.. A wall 😵 💫😵 💫

Really useful.

Marcus Aurelius: Vachement utile dis donc.

The question is not to know the usefulness or not, it's to see how far we can optimize the sectors of the game. That's the title of the subject....

Without going looking for any style of play, if you line up 5 liberos who know each other well 99 ng, plus 5 defensive midfielders who know each other well to defend, you will have more than that in defense in my opinion. On the other hand, you will be catastrophic in midfield and attack. So the results will not be there...

For me, it's the markings that make me laugh, sometimes you win and it's the player who scored a goal

iMcCarthy77: La question n’est pas de connaître l’utilité ou non c’est de voir jusqu’à combien on peut optimiser les secteurs de jeu .. Cest d’ailleurs le titre du sujet ….

How can we claim that utility is not a factor to be taken into account when talking about optimization in the same sentence?

In itself, an optimization must be useful; If it's not, you can't call it an optimization anymore. At best, it's a simple fact.

The example given by Demi is perfectly in this spirit. You're going to go higher in defence............ And there you go, yay.

Marcus Aurelius: Comment peut-on prétendre que l'utilité n'est pas une donnée à prendre en compte en parlant d'optimisation dans la même phrase ?

En soi, une optimisation se doit d'être utile ; si elle ne l'est pas, tu ne peux plus appeler ça une optimisation. Au mieux c'est une simple donnée.

L'exemple donné par Demi est parfaitement dans cet esprit. Tu vas monter plus haut en défense............et voilà, youpi.

Because in the case I took it didn't optimize anything at all, it's not a maximum, but I still found the stat rather high.. but it's a simple data as you say ..
Just that I haven't seen more for the moment..

It's still a wall of moss, he lost 0-1 ...

• 700 stats in defense, not bad, but hey it's pshitt from the 30/40th minute!

Then playing in a 5-5-0 not very serious formation, especially when you take 1 ^^