Good evening, as you know there are certain rules to respect now for direct transfers. I come across quite a few transfers that leave me very skeptical about the respect of this rule and about the sanctions. For example, I just came across a transfer: 28 years old MDC 94NG And I take a look. Sold 4 days ago for 12 million, a big gift yes. According to the rules the minimum for this player if I am not mistaken is 27M. We are far from that. So yes we can say that this transfer may have been made at auction, but how can we verify? Such a great player, I can't see him leaving for 12 million. In addition this transfer was carried out by two members of the same cartel, enough to leave me very skeptical. The problem is that this is far from being the only very suspicious transfer I come across, that's why I'm ranting. I am deliberately not displaying the names of the clubs concerned or the player because I do not know if it is allowed. Good evening

He had potential points for the direct play style, the buyer reallocated it and had to pay 10 euros on top of the 12M

Arnoldo09: Il avait des points en puissance pour le style jeu direct, l'acheteur l'a reattribué et a du débourser 10euros en plus des 12M

Okkk thanks for enlightening me on the subject

Teddy:

S. Sidet In this case, should this one be cancelled?

Arnoldo09: S. Sidet
Dans ce cas, faudrait annuler celui là ?

I was just asking myself the question, which is why I put that

Administrators have a life, they can't see everything. It's very simple. Otherwise we would have to put about ten of them.

This is why a transfer can be cancelled up to 60 days after the transaction.

Every transfer can be reported. Since Morten doesn't have 8 arms and 3 heads, I don't see how he could check every sale in the reports. 😅

Misha: Chaque transfert peut être signalé. Morten n’ayant pas 8 bras et 3 têtes, je vois pas comment il pourrait vérifier chaque vente dans les signalements. 😅

Wasn't there a button to report them back then?

It is also necessary to check that the transfer does not come from auctions.

Busy: Il faut également vérifier que le transfert ne provienne pas des enchères.

How do you see it?

Teddy: Tu le vois comment?

We don't, but the admins need to see it. What I mean is, you need to make sure before you cry wolf.

Alex-AJA: Il y avait pas un bouton pour les signaler à l'époque ?

On PC it's still relevant but not on the application

Dino_: Sur PC c'est toujours d'actualité mais pas sur l'application

Ah, my bad

Arnoldo09: S. Sidet
Dans ce cas, faudrait annuler celui là ?

I think it's the 30m price for this player

Le vrai stéphanois: Bonsoir, comme vous le savez il y a certaines règles à respecter maintenant pour les transferts direct.

Je tombe sur pas mal de transferts qui me laissent très septique sur le respect de cette règle et sur les sanctions.

Je viens par exemple de tomber sur un transfert:

28ans
MDC
94NG

Et je jette un coup d'œil. Vendu il y a 4jours pour 12millions, un gros cadeau oui.

D'après les règles le minimum pour ce joueur si je ne me trompe pas c'est 27M.
Nous en sommes loin.

Alors oui on peut dir...

Hello, Since you indirectly mention my transfer, I can confirm that it was bought at auction and that therefore the transfer complies with the regulations in force. It was visible and accessible to all and as said above, I used 100 stars to re-assign it since it had 99 in potential. Now I have trouble understanding your little sentence about the fact that I bought it from a member of my alliance. By looking at the transfer log you can see quite quickly that he sold similar players at the same prices and again at auction.

cedriic99: Hello,
Étant donné que tu cite indirectement mon transfert, je peux te confirmer qu’il a été acheté aux enchères et que de ce fait le transfert respecte le règlement en vigueur. Il était visible et accessible pour tous et comme dit plus haut, j’ai utilisé 100 étoiles pour le re attribuer étant donné qu’il avait 99 en puissance.
Maintenant j’ai du mal à comprendre ta petite phrase sur le fait que je l’ai acheté à un membre de mon entente. En regardant le journal des transferts tu peux t’aperce...

👋. I just hadn't thought about the fact that you are reallocated the 99 in power. So yes it was suspicious a transfer at 12M between two members of the same agreement (especially since I didn't know if it was at auction) Imagine your player who is bought by a member of your agreement at 12M (that's the image I had) it's not regulatory at all. But now I was explained how you proceeded, no problem

Le vrai stéphanois: 👋.

Je n'avais juste pas pensé au fait que tu es reattribué les 99 en puissance.
Donc oui c'était suspect un transfert a 12M entre deux membres de la même entente (surtout que je ne savais pas si c'était aux enchères)

Imagine toi ton joueur qui est acheté par un membre de ton entente a 12M (c'est l'image que j'avais) se n'est pas règlementaire du tout.

Mais mtn on m'a expliqué comment vous avez procédés, no problème

Indeed yes it may seem suspicious but I think that by searching a little more you could have had some answers (history of the selling club, history of the reassigned players etc.) I find it a little limited to make a subject to ask a question about a potential cheating by saying not to want to cite or accuse this or that club, while giving as much information to identify the players in question. It may not have been your goal but in my opinion it strongly resembles a disguised accusation of cheating.

Well, honestly, yes, in a way 😂. I was basically asking if it was cheating, so it's good that I suspected it was cheating. After now, I was told that it wasn't and why, perfect. I didn't think much about it, I didn't think about reattribution at all

Magikcats: Je trouve que c'est le prix 30 m pour ce joueur

It was 17M base it was cancelled ^^

Arnoldo09: C'était 17M de base il a été annulé ^^

Ahah ok, I hadn't seen that

Ah ok*