AmirAll |

9 month ago

#forum?topic=165391

do you see any difference?


Arazosv |

9 month ago

It says, the shift will arrive in the evening


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Demi-cerveau |

9 month ago

Question: will affinity now have an impact outside the “lines”? For example, will a defender and a midfielder who have already played together and who work on the "passing" skill on the same day develop an affinity that will be useful in a match?


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

lens59 |

9 month ago

Those who have a common program?


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Mide |

9 month ago

lens59: Ceux qui ont un programme commun ?

It’s complicated


Magik'jojo |

9 month ago

I don't really see any evolution there, other than accelerating the affinities between players. Let's see what it really does in the long term.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Magpie |

9 month ago

Demi-cerveau: Question : l'affinité va t'elle désormais avoir un impact en dehors des "lignes" ? Par exemple, un défenseur et un milieu de terrain qui ont déjà joués ensembles et qui travailleraient la compétence "passes" le même jour vont ils désormais développer de l'affinité qui sera utile en match ?

In theory yes, if I understood correctly :o


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

lens59 |

9 month ago

lens59: Ceux qui ont un programme commun ?

I say that because the program box has disappearedimage


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Zenze10 |

9 month ago

Well everything and suddenly lost ^^


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Cosmo |

9 month ago

if you have several daily workouts stored... Are they lost?


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

ManuM |

9 month ago

So what do we do with current training programs? What about stored workouts? I have 4 because I have an injured youngster...


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

michbou |

9 month ago

This may work independently of this new program.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Stan09 |

9 month ago

What about young people who take more than 100%?🤔


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Demi-cerveau |

9 month ago

If you have read correctly what Aymeric announced, there will no longer be personalized training programs for players, since in each session they will only be able to work on one characteristic.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

micha02 |

9 month ago

Same, I have 6 workouts, so are they lost?


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

lens59 |

9 month ago

A headache for training basically.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Alex-AJA |

9 month ago

1 point per training session?


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Arazosv |

9 month ago

Couldn't we have young people injured as a result? Really not a fan of this change, just to gain affinity, that's a lot of losses


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

lens59 |

9 month ago

For once I don't understand we went from 11 programs to 20 because a lot of requests to drop to zero Characteristics by Characteristics take out the calculator to not mess up %


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Marcus Aurelius |

9 month ago

When the community asks for advance notice, it's not 6 hours in advance, it's a little more.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Magik'jojo |

9 month ago

lens59: Pour une fois je comprends pas on est passé de 11 programme à 20 car beaucoup de demandes pour tomber à zéro
Caractéristiques par Caractéristiques sortez la calculette pour pas foiré de %

That’s already what I was doing, it’s not going to change much for me I think


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Ritter |

9 month ago

Ah, the force of always changing things I'm starting to lose for me this improvement is not the most judicious now everything that we do programs to train ect... Are a bit more lost.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

ManuM |

9 month ago

Yeah, I think it's a very bad innovation... However, I don't often criticize Aymeric's choices, but we should already give ourselves time to empty our stored training sessions and then when we have players who have for example 37% in def 28% in passes etc, it would be good to give us time to round everything up (if I'm clear enough 🤔)...


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Deck |

9 month ago

I would like the information for the stored workouts, to know if I press 6 times like a degenerate so as not to lose them... For the rest I'm not sure I have understood, but when I'm going to be at 96% 'a stats that I want to finish and I have a player coef 45 who takes 150% I would have no choice to try to finish the 4% than to put everything in a stat?


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Birdy |

9 month ago

I am waiting to see before reacting to this modification, at first glance it does not enchant me at all because there all the trainers will basically have a handicap, we will have to start all the calculations again, this reform is not necessarily a good solution.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

jul068 |

9 month ago

Individual training remains relevant? No change at this level? No cumulative loss of XP I hope 🙏


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Ritter |

9 month ago

I am against all the programs ect was good because it allows to improve this or that category what is the point of training then all the time and money to buy young people will be wasted. If we change things every 3 seasons it will really impact a lot of clubs, I'm waiting to see but that doesn't reassure me for the future.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Luis17 |

9 month ago

Deck: Je veux bien l'information pour les entraînements stockés, savoir si j'appuie 6 fois comme un dégénéré pour ne pas les perdre ...

Pour le reste je suis pas sûr d'avoir saisi, mais quand je vais être à 96% d'une stats que je veux finir et que j'ai un joueur coef 45 qui prend 150% j'aurais pas le choix pour tenter de finir les 4% que de tout mettre dans une stat ?

press 6x put all your players at 0 and half will be injured. not the right solution! anticipate with 1/2 training already if you have to lose them you will lose less that way..


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

aymeric45 |

9 month ago

This change does not change the fact that you start workouts whenever you want.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Donald |

9 month ago

Question for FFK, here is his question "I still can't post on the vfo so I'm going to ask my question here: I understand the training part which is changing, but will we still be able to store 7 training sessions? And if so how will this work? Let's imagine that I don't train from Monday to Saturday, on Sunday I do two, the training will be taken on Monday and Tuesday the next day, so I do two more? it will be taken from the previous week but I imagine that we will not have access to it since it is a new week"


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Donald |

9 month ago

Will this great revolution have an impact on cumulative XP?


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

ManuM |

9 month ago

aymeric45: Ce changement ne change rien au fait que vous lancez les entraînement quand vous le voulez.

What about stored workouts?


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

aymeric45 |

9 month ago

ManuM: Et pour les entraînements stockés ?

There is no impact.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

ManuM |

9 month ago

Ok so we can do 2 workouts in the same day!? Thank you for your answer


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

sora02 |

9 month ago

aymeric45: Il n'y a pas d'impact.

Hello Aymeric, Does the addition you made have an impact on the player's "raw" progress? Or does it have added value only on affinity? THANKS


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

aymeric45 |

9 month ago

There is no impact on the total progression of players


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Opalescent |

9 month ago

And for those who have training stored like 3 for me for example have lost if I understood correctly


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Ritter |

9 month ago

Basically, if I understood correctly, it will just improve the players' affinity in training. I don't see the improvement if already over the matches your players form an affinity. I don't know if the community will like this change, especially in terms of form. Afterwards your improvements are good I am not saying the opposite but here I am rather skeptical about this.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

grissais's man |

9 month ago

Hello, so if I understood correctly we can only do the training on one characteristic per week?


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Ritter |

9 month ago

I think that's it


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Luis17 |

9 month ago

grissais's man: Bonjour , du coup si j'ai bien compris on ne pourra faire l'entraînement sur une seule caractéristique par semaine ?

it's not mentioned that. in his photo he can do the same workout several times during the week so why couldn't he do 7/7


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Nitnelav |

9 month ago

aymeric45: Ce changement ne change rien au fait que vous lancez les entraînement quand vous le voulez.

Even cumulatively? Because if we define a day, there will be no accumulation? Or 0 Monday and 2 Tuesday? Also, I find it good to develop the game on the affinity aspect but already training is a thankless task (change in % taken per training, change in endurance, advance, time spent), this adds a real additional difficulty because there will be a bunch of "lost" %


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

johnnybegood |

9 month ago

If we come back to one feature per day, it is a regression of the system since the request of the community has always been to increase personalized programs.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Ritter |

9 month ago

Indeed I think it's a regression for me there are other improvements to be made before the training systems and very well like that pk change something that works.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Luis17 |

9 month ago

johnnybegood: Si on en revient à une caractéristique par jour, c'est une régression du système puisque la demande de la communauté a toujours été d'augmenter les programmes personnalisés.

Unless the % are boosted to the height of what we know today but the modification must be made... something that I fear


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

grissais's man |

9 month ago

Just to test, could we have collective training as a donation? Lol


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

michbou |

9 month ago

Normally it will be available this evening


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Blagoje Vidinic |

9 month ago

lens59: Pour une fois je comprends pas on est passé de 11 programme à 20 car beaucoup de demandes pour tomber à zéro
Caractéristiques par Caractéristiques sortez la calculette pour pas foiré de %

Will have to adjust with individual training.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Demi-cerveau |

9 month ago

I ask my question again: will affinity now have an impact outside the “lines”? For example, will a defender and a midfielder who have already played together and who work on the “passing” skill on the same day develop an affinity? Will this developed affinity be useful in a match if the 2 players are not on the same line?


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Blagoje Vidinic |

9 month ago

Since the affinity is done “per line”, I do not think that the affinity developed between an MDC and a DFC, if indeed it develops with this new feature, is taken into account.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message