Mide |
10 month agoWhat level do I need to reach if I want an EA score of 90 (assistant coach)
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Drezzo35 |
10 month ago[What level do I need to reach if I want an EA score of 90 (assistant coach)?
You need to send your EA on a training course, I'd recommend the youngest possible as by the time you've done the courses he'll be a few years older
The only constraint, it seems to me, is that only level 10 clubs can raise an EA to 90
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Morten34 |
10 month agoEach course lasts 5 days. To reach level 90, you need 10 courses for a potential 80, or 50 days (5x10). So it doesn't take years to get to level 90, it takes less than a season.Drezzo35 : I'd recommend the youngest possible, because by the time he's done the training courses he'll be a few years older
The only constraint, it seems to me, is that only level 10 clubs can take an EA up to 90
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
herbivore |
10 month agoBut what exactly is the impact of having a coach higher than 80, because between 75 and 80 it makes no difference at all?
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Marcus Aurelius |
10 month agoYou gain a few points on the complete training of a youngster by going for the higher levels, but it remains marginal.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Drezzo35 |
10 month agoEach course lasts 5 days. To reach level 90, you need 10 courses for a potential 80, or 50 days (5x10). So it doesn't take years to get to level 90, it takes less than a season[/quote]Drezzo35 : I'd recommend the youngest possible, because by the time he's done the courses he'll be a few years older
The only constraint, it seems to me, is that only level 10 clubs can take an EA up to 90
Nickel thanks for the complement!
And price-wise it's around 11M for the 10 courses if I'm not being silly
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
spoupou |
10 month agoNickel thanks for the complement!Morten34 :Each course lasts 5 days. To reach level 90, you need 10 courses for a potential 80, or 50 days (5x10). So it doesn't take years to get to level 90, it takes less than a seasonDrezzo35 : I'd recommend the youngest possible, because by the time he's done the training courses he'll be a few years older
The only constraint, it seems to me, is that only level 10 clubs can take an EA up to 90
And price-wise it's around 11M for the 10 courses if I'm not being silly
Stop writing if you don't want to talk nonsense
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Drezzo35 |
10 month agoMagpie |
10 month agoBlagoje Vidinic |
10 month agoWhen I made the change from an EA 80 to an EA 90 (season 133), this is what happened to the gains in collective training:
coef. 2.89: +14.14% instead of +14.11
coef. 9.84 : +39.98% instead of +39.91
coef. 10.08 : +40.91% instead of +40.84
coeff. 12.68: +50.56% instead of +50.47
coef. 12.99: +51.71% instead of +51.62
coef. 15.82: +62.27% instead of +62.16
coef. 24.81: +95.71% instead of +95.55
coef. 24.97: +96.16% instead of 96
coef. 33.4 : +127.64% instead of +127.42
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Blagoje Vidinic |
10 month ago[quote="Magpie"][quote="Blagoje Vidinic"]Level 9->
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Magpie |
10 month agoOn the other hand, I'd be curious to know if you can do even more with level 10 (I doubt it).
After that, even if you can do more, I'm not even sure it will have an effect
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Blagoje Vidinic |
10 month agoI tried but, no, I couldn't go any higher than 90.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Arazosv |
10 month agoDoesn't that change anything in terms of experience gained during a match too?Blagoje Vidinic : When I made the change from an EA 80 to an EA 90 (season 133), this is what happened to the gains in team training:
coef. 2.89: +14.14% instead of +14.11
coef. 9.84 : +39.98% instead of +39.91
coef. 10.08 : +40.91% instead of +40.84
coeff. 12.68: +50.56% instead of +50.47
coef. 12.99: +51.71% instead of +51.62
coef. 15.82: +62.27% instead of +62.16
coef. 24.81: +95.71% instead of +95.55
coef. 24.97: +96.16% instead of 96
coef. 33.4 : +127.64% instead of +127.42%
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Lebaygue |
10 month agoQuestion from a newborn, certainly, but if we send our EA on a training course, does he continue to coach during his training days? Or do we need a 2nd one to replace him?
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Blagoje Vidinic |
10 month agoNo, for that it's the progression coefficient that influences.Μοναξιά : [...]Doesn't that change something in terms of experience taken during a match too?
[It's a question of a newborn, certainly, but if we send our EA on a training course, does he continue to train during his training days? Or do we need a 2nd to replace him?
To be honest, I've never asked myself that question and I've always used another EA as a substitute.
It seemed logical to me.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Clamsii |
10 month agoNo, you have to have a substitute, otherwise if you send your EA on a training course, for example, your players won't train
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Lebaygue |
10 month agoThank you both... Even if one of you implies in your reply that I'm asking a stupid question😁
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Mide |
10 month agoThe difference is so small for a massive amount to upgradeBlagoje Vidinic : Au moment où j'ai fait le changement d'un EA 80 à un EA 90 (saison 133), voilà ce qui s'est passé sur les gains en entrainement collectif :
coef. 2.89 : +14.14% au lieu de +14.11%
coef. 9.84 : +39.98% au lieu de +39.91%
coef. 10.08 : +40.91% au lieu de +40.84%
coef. 12.68 : +50.56% au lieu de +50.47%
coef. 12.99 : +51.71% au lieu de +51.62%
coef. 15.82 : +62.27% au lieu de +62.16%
coef. 24.81 : +95.71% au lieu de +95.55%
coef. 24.97 : +96.16% au lieu de 96%
coef. 33.4 : +127.64% au lieu de +127.42%