Hello everyone,

For almost 2 months now, my junior recruiter has been bringing back nothing but "low potentials", never more than 75. Am I the only one affected? Is this logical with a CDF 10 and a recruiter 80?

Given that the CDF is probably the most interesting investment for making a bit of cash, is this a desire to restrict potential even further?

I've probably missed a few exchanges on this subject.

You forgot to hand in your bank card to find the best young people without looking for them

Good evening ,

Have you done the training courses to increase your skills?

Now we put a topic title and off we go? Who has posted to see his cdf or his team and help him?
I see the title and nothing else for the sniffer there is the aspa or a caterpillar other

For all we know, your recruiter is more of a labrador and a white cane ...

Tkt it's normal pot75 is good I think.
I've got an ea90 and I've only got 64 potential.

seblelionnais: Hello a tous,

Depuis pratiquement 2 mois, mon recruteur junior ne ramène que des "bas potentiels", qui ne dépassent jamais 75. Suis-je le seul touché? Est-ce logique avec un CDF 10 et un recruteur 80?

Sachant que le CDF est probablement l'investissement le plus intéressant pour faire un peu de trésorerie, est-ce une volonté de brider encore les potentiels?

J'ai probablement raté quelques échanges à ce propos

So you're not the only one, and the worst thing is that I only get 65 to 67s, and I also have an 80 and cdf 10 trainer.

hazard14: Tkt c'est normal pot75 c'est bien je trouve.
J'ai un ea90 et j'ai que des 64 de potentiel

75 51 days ago
74 80 days ago
80 days ago

In fact I'm a bit annoyed. I'm short of players in the cdf, it would have been nice to learn that the potential of players linked to the scout had dropped...

I would have kept my 60-64-69 lately found

seblelionnais: 75 il y a 51j
74 il y a 80j
80 il y a 150j

En fait je suis un peu embêté. Je manque de joueurs dans le cdf, ca aurait été bien d'apprendre que le potentiel des joueurs lié au recruteur avait baissé...

J'aurai gardé mes 60-64-69 dernièrement trouvés

Why don't you do detection then?

A but I do... I even have the majority of players detected. Hence my questioning, and obviously I'm not the only one!

I'm not saying otherwise, it's become rare to get a good young person from a recruiter 😅

#formation?activity

On average, there are around 2 young people at 80 (or more, ....) per page of 25 players.

So at the current rate, you have roughly one good young player every 12 weeks, or roughly 1 young player every 2 seasons (excluding detection).
This is clearly not enough to ensure the renewal of the generations (at the level of the current older players).

But everyone's in the same boat.

The game is based on competition between clubs, so if tomorrow morning the current recruitment parameters are relaxed, it will be the same for everyone. We'll find it easier to recruit good young players, but so will our competitors, so in the end it won't change much.

seblelionnais: Hello a tous,

Depuis pratiquement 2 mois, mon recruteur junior ne ramène que des "bas potentiels", qui ne dépassent jamais 75. Suis-je le seul touché? Est-ce logique avec un CDF 10 et un recruteur 80?

Sachant que le CDF est probablement l'investissement le plus intéressant pour faire un peu de trésorerie, est-ce une volonté de brider encore les potentiels?

J'ai probablement raté quelques échanges à ce propos

2 months is still enough, in 1 and a half years he's only brought me a 78 at the most, fortunately detections and the U17 tournament exist otherwise my cdf would be abandoned 😅

Just the same, every time the recruiter comes back ... and I see that he's brought me back another 95-year-old, given his potty and .... sometimes without even a walker.... I've got into the habit of bringing out my little video to mark the occasion... but yes! you know! the one with the trumpets during a botched joke in a B series: "poin poin poinnnnnnn" at least it allows me to take the thing with a smile and without remembering all the millions up in cdf that I've invested in it for .... (well for that among other reasons) xD

I've dubbed this technique the "anti RJ trumpet attack".

What's more ... I've really given up on RJ.
With hindsight, I realise that it's becoming stupid.
The only result I can get at the moment (as far as I'm concerned) is a - x thousand bucks every week.
It's not a bad idea to set us up with a CDF based on several million quid to reach the maximum, and then to continue to dangle a valid potential for our efforts in terms of budgetary sacrifice, with the aim of developing our club more or less serenely, only for me to find that I'm losing money by sending the RJ to bring me back m.... every week .... since lulurre.....

So I'm not going to send him any more until further notice. At least I'll have the satisfaction of not losing money for nothing.

And although in the past I've done a detection ball, and although I can understand that it takes a certain amount of difficulty to find a nugget, I find it an aberrant trick to make us spend so much time on it just to find the same pot of gold .... (while preventing the more ... stubborn from getting decent results with the 150 / x hour trick).

In short, it's become so laughable from a ratio point of view: time to set up the infras / monopolised resources / time required irl (whether it's the week for the RJ or the detection itself) / crappy results ..... that even getting back into detection is dead.

Thanks to those who persist.....

There's bound to be some randomness, and your rj won't bring you nuggets every week. But on average you can have between 1 and 3 pot > 77 per season. If you supplement that with detections, you'll always have an interesting rotation of players.

And as for the level of cdf, there's no difference between a level 9 and 10 over the long term.

Galywat: Il y a forcément une part d'aleatoire, et ton rj te ramènera pas des pépites toutes les semaines. Mais tu peux avoir en moyenne entre 1 et 3 pot > 77 par saison. En complétant avec des détections tu arrives à avoir un roulement de joueurs toujours un minimum intéressant.

Et pour le niveau de cdf il y a pas photo entre un niveau 9 et 10 sur le long terme.

Yes, I'm well aware that there's an element of randomness, thank you.
From what I've noticed before, yes it could be more or less correct, my RJ would bring some back from time to time.
For some time now it's mostly been a large majority of poo (bordering on the absolute... )
The 1 to 3 pot 77 via RJ / season is not correct (FOR MY PART) it brought me back 1 pot 80 (cdf 10 obviously and RJ 82 or 83 I do not know any more but briefly) there is 40 day by there, and beyond sa.... I have well another pot 80 in the cdf which goes back to ... 8 months ago that I detected lol. And while I did pull a few youngsters out of the cdf, they were all detected (by the RJ or me) more or less at that time.
And 8 months is what ... 4 seasons in a nutshell?
And if I've given up detection it's for the reasons given above. The ratio is clearly not crazy, nor does it make you want to, and the 150 / 6h limit is really discouraging for the most motivated because every time over the last 8 months it's been 76/77 at best. so ... cdf9 ....

Sa fait réver hein ? toutes ses dizaines de millions voire quelques centaines économisés pour ... ce résultat...

In short, that's what I'm saying: strength to those who persevere, and that the goddess RNG (or not) is smiling on you, my feeling is that it's just stupid to keep believing that you've hit the jackpot like the lottery (the difference is that in the lottery you only lose a few minutes buying your ticket for an equivalent result).

Personally, I don't have any money problems (at least not with this game... ^^').

But we should have the option of reducing the level of our CDF, as we can do with the stadium. Because between putting in 37M (from memory) + the X k€ per week to have 70... We might as well get 25-30M in one shot and buy 2-3 youngsters... All the while keeping the 70 pot from level 9.

How will you detect your pearls in Tuvalu if you reduce your cdf 🤨