myforsans |

31 dagen geleden

To enter the Top Twelve for the 10th edition (rewarded as last season with 12 M to the winner, 5 M to the finalist, 3 M to the qualifiers and 1 M per match won in the final phase)
1°) You must not have played or scheduled more than 4 matches by 16 August, as the publication date for the final 1st phase rankings is 17 August.
2°) You must not be taking part in a competition taking place at the same time (such as the CAN, for example) where the participants have non-random matches, set by their organiser.

Reminder: Under penalty of losing a match on the green carpet (not to mention any sanctions decided by the admins), you must comply with the general rules applicable to the federations' regulations.
In particular, these rules include not taking advantage of an injured or suspended player selected to make a 6th change during the match.

Good luck to everyone in adding your name to the list of winners below
1 (season 133)
FINLAND (Guilain) - MALI (Tank LA) 3-0

2 (season 134)
VIET NAM (Tomasm) - SOUTH AFRICA (Baay-faal) 1-0

3 (season 135)
KAZAKHSTAN (Sun's) - BRAZIL (Jamsss) 2-1

4 (season 136)
ENGLAND (Skyz) - JAPAN (Myforsans) 3-0

5 (season 137)
BRAZIL (Jamsss) - SOUTH AFRICA (Ablaye) 0-0 (4-3 on penalties)

6 (season 138)
ENGLAND (Skyz) - ICELAND (Azby) 1-0

7 (season 139)
FRANCE (Jamsss) - SWEDEN (Rafaelle) 1-1 (2-0 on penalties)

8 (season 140)
SOUTH AFRICA (Lahi) - AUSTRALIA (Magik'jojo) 1-0

9 (season 141)
Iran (Fidel BBTG) - Brazil (Nims57) 1-0


Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht

Ancelloti |

31 dagen geleden

Belize selection
Coach Ancelloti
Rules and regulations : Read and approved


Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht

myforsans |

31 dagen geleden

There is no pre-registration for the 1st phase. Only the 12 qualifiers from the Top Twelve will be asked to post their approval of the rules. The 1st round is free (which doesn't mean you can't respect the rules!).


Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht

myforsans |

24 dagen geleden

Following the match Tanzania Belarus the match is declared lost for Tanzania on the green carpet for a triple reason:

  1. Selection of 6 RTG

  2. Selection of two players from the same club
    A. Hus
    M. Tumba

  3. Selection of two players from the same club
    M. Kamtande
    H. Kiemba


Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht

myforsans |

24 dagen geleden

I remind you that if you notice an irregularity in a selection, you must inform me by PM.


Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht

k3vin59218 |

24 dagen geleden

myforsans: Suite au match Tanzanie Biélorussie le match est déclaré perdu pour la Tanzanie sur le tapis vert pour une triple raison :

  1. Sélection de 6 RTG

  2. Selection de deux joueurs du même club
    A. Hus
    M. Tumba

  3. Sélection de deux joueurs du même club
    M. Kamtande
    H. Kiemba

And for Belarus, 0 points all the same?


Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht

micha02 |

24 dagen geleden

Si tu aurez les 3 pts inscrit manuellement tkt


Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht

k3vin59218 |

24 dagen geleden

I'm not the president of Belarus 😄 it was just to know everything as it is not specified


Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht

myforsans |

23 dagen geleden

2nd match of Tanzania with a composition contrary to the VF regulations of the Federations
#match?mid=6369950
And so 2nd match lost on the green carpet
Well, I've got the impression that Tanzania are out of the competition anyway, since they're now taking part in the African Cup of Nations, which is incompatible with the League of Federations.


Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht

Blagoje Vidinic |

23 dagen geleden
[centre]Yesterday, a reminder of the rules was sent to the Tanzania coach, who was unaware of this aspect of the workings of federations (!!!); in the event of a repeat offence, he will be punished in accordance with the rules[/center].

Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht

myforsans |

23 dagen geleden

One suggestion.
Wouldn't it be a good idea if, when a manager applies for a federation election, there was a box to tick stating that the candidate had read the rules and agreed to abide by them ... the VF rules, not the League of Federations rules 🙂.
Because it's a bit easy to tell an admin that you didn't know ... because to select two players from the same club, you have to use a loophole (known by assumption known by those who use it!).


Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht

Demi-cerveau |

22 dagen geleden

No, all it takes is for a selected player to be transferred. It can happen to any coach who doesn't systematically check all his players 5 minutes before validating his selection. So in fact it can happen to absolutely anyone.


Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht

myforsans |

22 dagen geleden

Yes, it can happen in the case you mentioned (and the same goes for more than 5 players per agreement), but in 99% of cases it happens differently 🙂 Look at the number of days the clubs belong to and you'll see that it's done differently.
Look at the number of days the clubs concerned have been members and you'll see that it happens differently (don't act ignorant, you know enough about the game to know how it's done). It's already happened that a federation has fielded 5 players from the same club, including 2 in training, so you can be sure that this doesn't really correspond to your example, which once again is very marginal.


Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht

myforsans |

22 dagen geleden

Then you have to distinguish between the competition rules and the VF rules.
If the case you mention happens in the competition, the match will be lost on the green carpet, but I think that the VF admin who receives the case you mention will be understanding if the coach is acting in good faith and will ask him to regularise the situation without imposing a penalty of his own on VF.


Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht

pieutte |

12 dagen geleden

Hi, are we allowed to play the same federation twice?


Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht

Blagoje Vidinic |

12 dagen geleden

Given that the proposals do not allow you to know your opponent in advance, this does not pose a problem... but if it is found to be an 'arrangement' between the two federations, the administrative team will be able to issue a warning and impose sanctions in the event of a repeat offence.


Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht

myforsans |

9 dagen geleden

A quick update on the provisional standings.
With 8 days to go before the end of the first phase, the current standings (taking into account matches lost on penalties) are as follows
There are many familiar faces from previous finals, as well as newcomers such as Luxembourg, Tuvalu and Latvia.

1 Cuba 9 pts 10-0
ex Belarus 9 pts 10-0
3 South Africa 9pts 9-0
4 Luxembourg 0pts 8-0
5 Slovakia 9 pts 8-1
6 Ghana 9 pts 6-0
7 Georgia 9 pts 4-0
8 Finland 7 pts 5-0
ex Brazil 7 pts 5-0
10 Iceland 7 pts 4-1
ex Estonia 7 pts 4-1
12 Tuvalu 7 pts 3-1
ex Iran 7 pts 3-1
14 Latvia 6 pts 7-0
15 Australia 6 pts 8-2
16 Honduras 6pts 5-0

Reminder: the deadline for playing your matches is 16 August (and don't schedule more than 4).


Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht

myforsans |

27u geleden

The 1st phase of the League came to an end with last night's matches.
The standings are as follows (taking into account matches won/lost on the green carpet, exclusions of federations having played/scheduled more than 4 matches and exclusions of federations participating in parallel competitions where matches are not scheduled at random: CAN, CP Cup).

  1. Australia 12 pts 16-3
  2. Slovakia 12 pts 12-1
  3. Belarus 10 pts 10-0
  4. Finland 10 pts 8-0
  5. Ghana 10 pts 6-0
  6. Brazil 10 pts 6-0 (separated from Ghana by the draw)
  7. Iceland 10 pts 6-1
  8. Iran 10 pts 6-1 (drew with Iceland)
  9. Georgia 10 pts 4-0
  10. Luxembourg 9 pts 8-2
  11. England 9 pts 7-1
  12. New Zealand 9 pts 11-5
  13. Saudi Arabia 9 pts 5-0
  14. France 8 pts 6-1
  15. Tuvalu 8 pts 3-1
  16. Latvia 7 pts 8-1

For the 16 federations concerned, you must accept the rules for the second phase before 8pm on Tuesday evening.
Depending on the eventual refusal of certain federations, the final ranking of the 1st phase, which will be used to draw up the table for the second phase, will be published on Tuesday evening.

As a reminder: the top 4 qualify directly for the quarter-finals, the federations ranked 5 to 12 play a 1/8 final play-off and the federations ranked 13 to 16 above are on the waiting list and will qualify if a federation ranked 1 to 12 refuses to take part.


Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht

myforsans |

27u geleden

For the 2nd phase, Belarus, rules read and accepted


Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht

Fidel BBTG |

27u geleden

Rules read and accepted for the second phase Iran 🇮🇷


Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht

Nims57 |

27u geleden

Rules read and accepted for the second phase for Brazil 😀


Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht

Azby |

27u geleden

Iceland, rules read and accepted.


Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht

pieutte |

27u geleden

Luxembourg, read and accepted.


Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht

jamsss |

27u geleden

Rules read, read and accepted for France!


Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht

Ragen |

26u geleden

Rules read and accepted by Saudi Arabia


Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht

Skyz |

25u geleden

Rules read and accepted for England


Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht

myforsans |

25u geleden

I hadn't realised that Australia was "out of the running" because of its participation in the CP Cup.
As a result, the first-phase standings have been changed as follows: All the teams move up one place and Sweden, who were 17th, become 16th and are potentially eligible to qualify.


Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht

Hydilik |

25u geleden

Regulations read and approved for Latvia....finally, if I've read the right Regulations :-).
We're talking about the regulations in the VF regulations, aren't we?


Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht

kiki-sainté |

25u geleden

I am only qualifying for the 2nd time for this competition and my aim is to do better than the 8th final.
Rules read and approved


Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht

myforsans |

25u geleden

Yes, the general VF rules on federations (no players in training, no multiple players belonging to the same club, but also the specific rules of the competition which are superimposed: submission of a list of 22 players etc....).


Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht

Ragen |

25u geleden

If I understand correctly, Saudi Arabia automatically qualify by finishing 12th.


Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht

Fidel BBTG |

25u geleden

Ragen: Si je comprends bien l'Arabie saoudite est d'office qualifié en allant à la 12 e place

Rhorrr you're not still on the bottle?


Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht

Ragen |

25u geleden

Move with it 😂


Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht

Uzzego27 |

23u geleden

Rules read and accepted for Slovakia


Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht

Uzzego27 |

23u geleden

Having finished first and therefore qualified for the quarter-finals, can I organise a friendly while we wait for the rest of the competition?


Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht

seblelionnais |

22u geleden

Read and approved for Tuvalu. I would go with less players than the max allowed I think 🤣


Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht

Guilain |

3u geleden

Rules read and approved by Finland. 🇫🇮


Dit bericht is vertaald. (FR) Oorspronkelijk bericht