Everyone,
Has everyone noticed the significant loss of stats when you move? It's more than before, isn't it?
What's the point? I can't quite figure it out.

Kevin-7130: Ola tout le monde,
Tout le monde a remarqué la perte de stats importante des qu'on bouge ? C'est plus qu'auparavant non ?
Quel est le but ? J'ai dû mal a cerner.

Avoid changing every 2 seconds

So we're still rewarding the afk, is that the aim? What's the point of making a match last 90 minutes if the best solution is to move very little?

Kevin-7130: Donc on récompense encore les afk, c'est ça le but ? Quel intérêt de faire durer un match 90min si la meilleure solution est de très peu bouger ?

That's Jex's theory ^^
You can change tactics but the goal is not to change every 2 minutes
Do you really think Mourinho changes tactics every 30 seconds? No.

Wahhh comparing an IRL coach to a game of probabilities... why not!
But seriously, I don't mind that it's not the aim to move every minute, but the loss of stats is even greater than before, isn't it? And I really don't see the point.
The best tactic will be to play normal at the back and attack on the wing in front and pray?

Kevin-7130: Wahhh comparer un coach IRL a un jeu de probabilités... why not !
Non mais sérieusement je veux bien que c'est pas le but de bouger chaque minute, mais la perte de stats est encore plus grosse qu'avant, non ? Et là je vois vraiment pas l'intérêt.
La meilleure tactique sera normal derrière et attaque aile devant et prier ?

Yes, the loss is significant because it had become unbearable to have guys changing all the time without any tactical logic,
You can make changes but they are more penalisable, if you wait a little you recover the loss
unless you make changes all the time and then you're more handicapped, which is a good thing.
Yes, we're talking about probabilities, but that doesn't rule out tactical and managerial logic.

basically kevin you put your team and you reconnect at half-time, simple vf

If you look at the positive side, it's that the wrong tactics will be very costly.

It forces you to move more sparingly, but you have much less room for error because every change is costly.

So, paradoxically, the tactical side remains quite pregnant.

The drop isn't nearly as bad as you'd have us believe.
What's more, the stats go back up after a few minutes to simulate the fact that the players are adapting to the new instructions.
All in all, nothing too serious.

NB: it will always be easier to win a match by changing your tactics if they're not appropriate than to do nothing and rely solely on luck.
I'd urge anyone who thinks AFK have an advantage to stop following their games. Drezzo did... He hasn't had better results though, and yet he's really bad. 😁

When you're playing against an opponent who's also trying to score a goal by various means, the loss of stats is taken on both sides anyway, it's part of the game.
But if you see that your opponent isn't moving, and you're getting impatient to score, try not to move too much either.

The good news is that we had to wait until 15 January this year to read the first useless topic from those used to chouinage... a record to be beaten in 2027... being optimistic, I'm banking on 17 January next year. At this rate, we'll have to wait until 2075 to spend a year in peace, as we'll all be dead, Aymeric included.

Lebaygue: La bonne nouvelle,c est qu'il aura fallu attendre le 15 janvier de cette année pour lire le premier topic inutile des habitués au chouinage...record a battre en 2027... étant optimiste,je mise sur le 17 janvier de l année prochaine,a ce rythme, faudra attendre 2075 pour passer une année peinard vu qu on sera tous morts, Aymeric compris.

Do you see any whining? Your comments are just as important to the community, don't worry.

Personally, I'd rather read Lebaygue's contributions than the endless lamentations about the match engine. 😅