Dev
Instead of a left-center center-right choice, there should be a choice of six different directions.
Goal chances should include player ability of skills and deflection in the right choice.
<player>

+Player skill x 75% success rate If the ball is in the right direction.
(XG %75 goal chance and %25 Out / Hits the Crossbar miss chance.)
<goalkeeper>

-%25 miss chance: Failed to keep the ball If the goalkeeper is in the right direction.
+%75 save chance: Ball goes out, hits crossbar and saved, saved...
In a live game a penalty should be given too with xG.

You must be a real pain in the arse to come up with such hollow subjects..

Zeus, you're always complaining in comments.
If you have a project, write, you will use your time more valuable like others. We will also read the projects you call which is important to you.
You should stop driving people away from the forum and the game.
As i know this is not JavaScript game which you guys hunting text codes and calling commands automaticly to manage football club. 😉
So interface means something more important here.
Advancing the game its up to Aymeric yet i share more idea and feed back Weekly with you guys.

Throw lightning instead of tomatoes. Let them shine and sprak in the air with your ideas. 🙂

AmirAll: Zeus, you're always complaining in comments.
If you have a project, write, you will use your time more valuable like others. We will also read the projects you call which is important to you.
You should stop driving people away from the forum and the game.
As i know this is not JavaScript game which you guys hunting text codes and calling commands automaticly to manage football club. 😉
So interface means something more important here.
Advancing the game its up to Aymeric yet i share more id

Bégin's fault isn't them...
Ils sont toujours la a ridiculiser et si vraiment tu lui demande s'il a compris ce que tu as dis ci haut il diras qu'il a rien compris juste il est la a attendre qu'un sujet soit mis pour venir écrire ridicule puis sortir rien d'autre. And above all, in my opinion, these subjects are up for debate if you're against it, so bring your reasons...

No matter how much I read and re-read, I have to admit that I don't understand the project at all.

It would be useful to develop the subject because it is not understandable

Jallow: Bhein le défaut c'est pas eux...
Ils sont toujours la a ridiculiser et si vraiment tu lui demande s'il a compris ce que tu as dis ci haut il diras qu'il a rien compris juste il est la a attendre qu'un sujet soit mis pour venir écrire ridicule puis sortir rien d'autre. Et surtout ça selon moi c'est sujet sont à débattre si tes contre tu tu amène ton pourquoi...

I still wonder how AmirAll can like your comment...

Already, the way you express yourself is incomprehensible, so once translated, I can't imagine...

#tactique?penalties
your penalty options looking like this...
left center right

And i gived an Example image of goal post. So basic shooting sectors are gonna be changed. Yet there is also xG for each selected area.

Even if you know the right direction, it may not be a goal.
25% deviation
75% success
I mentioned this xG possibility.

The title says subject, the pictures are clear, the content is about goal chances of penalty. Is there a problem with the translation? Tab to see original one.

He's actually talking about Penalties
His idea is to include a % of failure even if the goalkeeper chose the wrong side.

Not absurd, interesting. But perhaps not the priority of the game.
There are so many more important things to fix first...

But the idea of a diagram is a good one. It would help a lot of managers, I think, to understand the TABs, if they haven't read the last line of the manual #manual?page=39

If there's a chance of missing even when the keeper goes the wrong way, there should be a chance of scoring even when the keeper goes the right way... but that's going to get complex and, as Magpie points out, it's far from a priority so... there's a good chance it'll be implemented. ^^

Although the goalkeeper is in the right direction, there is a little chance of a goal, yes, I wrote that down too.

Magpie: Il parle des Penalty en fait (auto-traduit "penalités")
Son idée est d'inclure un % d'échec même si le gardien a choisi le mauvais coté.

Pas absurde, intéressant. Mais peut-être pas la priorité du jeu.
Il y'a tellement de choses plus importantes à réparer avant...

Mais l'idée d'un schéma est bien en revanche. Ça aiderait pas mal de managers je pense, à comprendre les TAB, s'ils n'ont pas lu la dernière ligne du manuel #manual?page=39

You can already sense the maturity in the expression - I love it!

Alex-AJA: J'ai beau lire et relire mais je dois avouer que je comprends rien au projet.

Dont you like your Virtuafoot Manager Euro Ball detail over there? 😥

https://x.com/SoccerAM/status/1228000885688717313?t=vSCd_EhVEoowXy-8ojNNkg&s=19

close this topic.
tnx

It's not up to you to decide whether a topic should be closed or not.

Coming back to the original topic, I think the idea is pretty good. But I have no idea whether it's technically feasible or not. Only Aymeric could answer that question.

%75! 😎