Hi vfiens
I don't know why the admins and the game owner still refuse to tackle this problem.
Season after season, we find practically the same agreements in the first places and the competition ends up losing its interest.

I'd like to make it clear that I have no problem with the LR or CP teams. They play by the current rules and take advantage of the system that's in place. My question only concerns the entente system.

How do you explain the fact that the same dominant cartels can be found in Division 1 but also in Division 2? Why not further limit the number of members per agreement? Why continue to authorise secondary agreements that further strengthen the already most powerful structures?

In the long term, this situation risks discouraging new agreements and reducing the interest of the competition. Virtuafoot needs a system that promotes greater balance and gives each agreement the opportunity to compete for titles.

A competition is always more exciting when several candidates can really claim victory.

Thank you at last someone is talking about it

Congratulations to the Irs on winning the title once again

You say
In the long term, this situation risks discouraging new agreements and reducing the interest of the competition. Virtuafoot needs a system that promotes greater balance and gives each agreement the chance to compete for titles.

But at the same time, you've probably noticed that as soon as the supposedly stronger teams are beaten by a smaller one, people start screaming about carrots, complaining that the game is badly set up and so on;

Hard, hard to please everyone :) :) :)

Hello ,

Are you really sure you're telling the admin team that you don't want to deal with this?

We'll let you debate this subject, as far as I know we're not closing it down directly, are we?

Aymeric also goes over the topics, and whether it's Aymeric or the admin team, you can't change everything at once just because a manager asks you to.

Changes to agreements have always been made and always will be:

There were too many 2 agreements in D1, now they don't have access, now it's removing the 2 because we can't develop, in 10 seasons it'll be removing the agreements because we don't win our matches?

If you think that the admin team doesn't do anything, well, you're wrong with all the cases and problems. So yes, we still have to sort out the agreements in D5, but this is the first and last time that you accuse the admin team of refusing to act, because up until now we've always been there with the means at our disposal.

With that explanation and warning, enjoy the rest of the debate.

You're going to make the same post every 15 days. If it's always the same deals in mind, there's a reason. You can't build an agreement, recruit 20 or 30 afk and claim to be winning D1.
How does it bother you or the members of your agreement that the Lr or the Cp dominate the standings? On the contrary, personally I find it a challenge to beat them. And we're seeing more and more D1 teams getting closer and closer in the rankings.

You're right
We're going to give full powers to someone who takes advantage of the system every day in real life to do nothing at work and invent a life for himself at padel.

Steril, we're giving you the keys to the game. With you and Ali, he's in good hands.

After that, it's always between the psg and another club in Ligue 1.
Enfin je crois

Ali, you know I'm very fond of you.

But you should stop posting the same thing over and over again. It's a subject that's been seen over and over again, and it won't change. On the contrary, it should motivate us little people to become better than them.

If LR are always at the top, it's because they make sure they are. You have to stop thinking that everything is simple. Let's take a leaf out of their book and, in time, other agreements will manage to be competitive too.