Ali_Cool |
1h agoHi vfiens
I really like this game, but I think there are a few things that could be improved.
As a cartel chairman, I find it extremely difficult to strengthen my project with strong clubs. It's become almost impossible to convince teams with more than 80 strength to join my cartel, because the majority of managers are obsessed with the idea of joining.
Roman Legion
Viking Legion
or
Chacun Sa Chope
On top of that, many members leave the game or stop playing, which makes it very difficult to build a stable long-term project.
I also think that allowing cartels to create secondary cartels is a bad idea, because it simply allows them to accumulate the strongest teams.
When you look at the competition, you see that two cartels dominate the titles, not necessarily because they are the strongest, but mainly because the competition system always gives them priority in recruiting the best clubs.
That's why I think we need to :
reduce the number of members in cartels;
prevent secondary agreements from gaining access to Divisions 1, 2 and 3;
set up a system similar to that of clubs such as the reserve team, which only participates in the lower division.
I'm saying this for the good of the game and to make the competition more balanced and fairer for everyone.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
hazard14 |
1h agoI reassure you, you can remove the LV from the 3 named đ
Good luck.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Marcus Aurelius |
1h agoSister agreements are a problem; episode 595.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
gweltaz29 |
44 min agoSo no!
Players are of course free to make their own choices, but the clubs you've mentioned are clubs that have worked hard to get to the top level!
You can't come along and want to destroy what they've built, and the image they've managed to give their clubs!
Players only want the best, so build one of the best and then you'll be saying something completely different!
Have a great evening!
Gweltaz
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Tomasm |
40 min agoThere's still such a thing as "to each his own"?
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Lahi |
32 min agoAli_Cool: Salut les vfiens
Jâaime beaucoup ce jeu, mais je pense quâil y a plusieurs choses Ă amĂ©liorer.
En tant que prĂ©sident dâentente, jâai Ă©normĂ©ment de difficultĂ©s Ă renforcer mon projet avec des clubs puissants. Il est devenu presque impossible de convaincre des Ă©quipes de plus de 80 de force de rejoindre mon entente, car la majoritĂ© des managers sont obsĂ©dĂ©s par lâidĂ©e de rejoindre
Legion Romain
Legion viking
ou
Chacun Sa ChopeEn plus de cela, beaucoup de membres quittent le jeu ou arrĂȘte...
Strangely for me, that's what makes the game so charming...
Yes, there are 2-3 deals that stand out, dominate everything, and it's normal that they attract managers who want to win a title.
It's like in the IRL (as you often like to use the IRL example đ). You see clubs like Real, Barça and Bayern (to name but a few) attract the best players, because they're the best clubs. And to keep up with them, other clubs like PSG, with the arrival of the Qataris of course đ have set up a solid long-term project to catch up...
I'm talking about the long term, because that's the key. When you're having trouble attracting staff, you have to work at the grassroots level. Work with the managers who are available (often a small core group). Work on the basics without rushing. And over the long term, the agreement grows and ends up attracting people.
Let me give you an example of our agreement. We had trouble recruiting, for many reasons... some real, some invented... We were under a bit of a "blockade", if I can put it that way. So we decided: "Let's not rely on new recruits, let's rely on what we've got. Let's train our beginners. Let's set up a project that will bear fruit in the long term".
Today, some of our members have become major managers, without ever leaving the agreement. And yet, at the start, they were small, new clubs, sometimes old but with no 'experience'. But we took care to guide them and support them. We told them: "By December 2025, we want you to be ready to help us. We even called this project "12/25", with a clearly defined plan...
I'm not saying it works every time. But this kind of thing can help you to grow, to play the leading roles, and then to start attracting.
For me, it's perfectly natural. The domination of these agreements is the fruit of their hard work, their policy, their organisation and their discipline. You can't ask for changes all the time just because some people are dominant. They dominate through their work and nothing else.
Good luck with your project đđ»
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Ancelloti |
17 min agoAli_Cool: Salut les vfiens
Jâaime beaucoup ce jeu, mais je pense quâil y a plusieurs choses Ă amĂ©liorer.
En tant que prĂ©sident dâentente, jâai Ă©normĂ©ment de difficultĂ©s Ă renforcer mon projet avec des clubs puissants. Il est devenu presque impossible de convaincre des Ă©quipes de plus de 80 de force de rejoindre mon entente, car la majoritĂ© des managers sont obsĂ©dĂ©s par lâidĂ©e de rejoindre
Legion Romain
Legion viking
ou
Chacun Sa ChopeEn plus de cela, beaucoup de membres quittent le jeu ou arrĂȘte...
It's not in 2 months that you'll be able to convince your 80 friends to join your agreement. When you launch an agreement project on this game, you really need to get your neurons firing to manage it and be patient.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message