Jallow |
57 days agoWhat is the cause of reduced sponsor benefits?
@aymeric45 ?
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
myforsans |
57 days agoWhile we're on the subject of sponsors, it would be a good idea to introduce a wider variety of objectives with a greater degree of modulation of bonuses.
For example:
For the championship :
- win
- finish on the podium
- ensure we stay up
Champions League and Vffa Challenge: - win
- reach the quarter-finals
- reach the 1/16 finals
- get out of the group
and so on.
We could also have 2 sponsors, a main one and a secondary one offering 1/3 of the main sponsor's bonus.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Tchub |
57 days agomyforsans: Tant qu'à toucher aux sponsors ce serait surtout bien d'introduire une plus grande variété d'objectifs avec une plus grande modulation des primes
Par exemple :
Pour le championnat :
- gagner
- monter sur le podium
- assurer le maintien
Pour la Ligue des Champions et le Vffa Challenge :
- gagner
- atteindre les 1/4 de finale
- atteindre les 1/16 de finale
- sortir des poules
Etc,...On pourrait aussi avoir 2 sponsors, un principal et un secondaire qui offre 1/3 de la prime du sponsors princ...
In other words, championship bonuses already exist, more or less, via the bonuses offered to the top 3 finishers.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Nitnelav |
57 days agoI've never understood and probably never will understand the point of regulating gambling money to such an extent.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Bigtime |
57 days agoI think the sponsor's variable part is far too large. A sponsor should pay 50% automatically at the start of the season and the rest based on the objectives achieved at the end of the season.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Galywat |
57 days agoJallow: Quelle est la cause de réduction des bénéfices sur les sponsors ?
@aymeric45 ?
There has been quite a lot of money distributed via the community objective, so it's probably linked.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Rull43 |
57 days agoGalywat: Il y a eu pas mal d'argent distribué via l'objectif communautaire, c'est probablement lié.
Yes what I thought. We're not in a totally free market, the central bank is watching 🤣
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Galywat |
57 days agoRull43: Oui ce que j'ai pensé. Nous ne sommes pas dans un marché totalement libre, la banque centrale veille 🤣
In itself it's not too bad, for a management aspect and also to keep a bit of control over prices to have a relatively stable game.
In the same vein, salaries have increased considerably over the last few seasons.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
myforsans |
56 days agoYes, it's gone up a lot, I have 32 good players who used to pay me 200 K a week now they pay me 400, so that's less than 2 M difference over a season, which is peanuts.
Compared to a sponsor that loses 10 million euros...... or a community objective that was supposedly announced as a recurring one but was forgotten after an insane windfall paid out once to almost all the clubs.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
dudziak |
56 days agoafter ukraine's fault now it's iran's fault that everything is increasing, vf must be one of these 2 countries hence the logical increase lol
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message