Kevin-7130 |
5h agoHello everyone,
Are regressions accelerating for you too?
M. Anderson
5 points down in one week... 3NG less in just one week...!
What about you?
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Skyz |
5h agoYes, it's a massacre, but the aim is to get the next 'meta' generation in as quickly as possible, I imagine.
But it's a bit embarrassing when most of the best players in that generation are players to be reallocated in the store.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Rull43 |
4h agoThe Texas Chainsaw Massacre, a very, very old school film.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Misha |
3h agoWell, it was slow (-3NG per season).
There was literally ONE guy who whined. And now it's -6...
There you go. ^^
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
myforsans |
2h agoI'm surprised that some people are surprised!
The game has always worked this way, with over-reactions to poorly anticipated situations.
Some people complain that nothing's happening and then suddenly there's a reaction to the power of 4 to make up for the fact that nothing has happened.
Obviously this doesn't please those who thought that their 38 years in 4 seasons would still be the kings of the game until they retired.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Damien2911 |
2h agoWhich remains problematic.
Over a long period of time, players stop progressing. Once they reach a certain age, it's all downhill from there.
The vision of a player's level during his career is problematic.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
myforsans |
2h agoDamien2911: Ce qui reste problématique.
Pendant toute une longue période, les joueurs ne progressent plus. Arrivés à un certain âge, c'est la chute.
La vision du niveau d'un joueur durant sa carrière est problématique.
Particularly the fact that we know that from the age of 22, or 23 or sometimes 24, we know in advance that for 6 to 8 seasons it will remain almost identical with barely 1 pt more gained at a snail's pace, whereas it would be more realistic if this period of maturity were jagged.
But this is a virtual game and we should once and for all stop believing that the game reflects reality.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Damien2911 |
49 min agoI think there's something in the middle between not making progress and wanting to stick to reality.
Even in a virtual game, I think there are better things to do than to see a player not progress for 6-7 seasons and then fall drastically. At 24-25-26-27, or even more, a player continues to progress.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Lebaygue |
21 min agoWell, they continue to make progress between the end of their upward curve and the downward curve... they easily gain 4-5 NG points during this lap.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Demi-cerveau |
18 min agoDamien2911: Je pense qu'entre ne pas progresser et vouloir coller à la réalité il y a quelque chose au milieu.
Même dans un jeu virtuel, je trouve qu'il y a mieux à faire que de voir un joueur ne pas progresser pendant 6-7 saisons avec de drastiquement chuter. A 24-25-26-27, voire même plus, un joueur continue à progresser.
What you say is factually incorrect. Over 6-7 seasons, the player, if trained to improve the grade, will progress by 6-7 ng.
A 83gns player at 23, trained over the next 7 seasons to optimise his score, will have a score of 90 at 30, and 7 more endurance points if you add in the pre-season training sessions. That's not insignificant. On the contrary, the game is very well done in this respect. Players reach their highest level, then progress slowly over the following seasons.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message