Good evening everyone,

Following the problems that there was with the loans and reminders of loan as well as the uses of the event for the endurance, the MDJ will deactivate the function of reminder of loan.

bluethunders26: Bonsoir a tous ,

Suites aux problèmes qu' il y a eu avec les prêts et rappels de prêt ainsi que les utilisations de l évènement pour l endurance , le MDJ va désactiver la fonction de rappel de prêt .

Similarly, the club that has the player on loan can't cancel it on its own?

bluethunders26: Bonsoir a tous ,

Suites aux problèmes qu' il y a eu avec les prêts et rappels de prêt ainsi que les utilisations de l évènement pour l endurance , le MDJ va désactiver la fonction de rappel de prêt .

What if we lend to another to train and the latter stops the game???
The loaned player will then fall behind 😕

k3vin59218: De meme pour le club ayant le joueur preté , il ne pourra pas l annuler de son coté?

in principle, no, he won't be able to

Levi: Et si on prête à un autre pour former et que ce dernier arrête le jeu ??
Le joueur prêté prendra donc un retard 😕

yes, it's the risks, by stopping, it won't lead to any loan agreement.

bluethunders26: oui c est les aleas , en arretant il n enfrain aucun accord de pret

Fine

bluethunders26: oui c est les aleas , en arretant il n enfrain aucun accord de pret

In such cases, could the admins recall them and send them back to the owner's club?

When will VF be stable? Transfers are authorised at 100k but we no longer have the right to call back loans.

Frankly, the game is going in all directions and I wonder if the mdj understands what he's doing.

bluethunders26: Bonsoir a tous ,

Suites aux problèmes qu' il y a eu avec les prêts et rappels de prêt ainsi que les utilisations de l évènement pour l endurance , le MDJ va désactiver la fonction de rappel de prêt .

Hello,

Quick question, is it possible to "defer" the ban, say 2-3 days? To allow legit players to get their players back if things aren't going well?
Or has the function already been deactivated and some people have it in their bones?

Salut non mais sérieux la c'est la fin des prêts,,a cause d'idiots qui trichent les autres sont punis encore une fois quand est ce va finir de prendre pour les autres?
If you want to destroy the game, do it once and for all because it's becoming unpleasant to play a management game that wants to resemble reality and half the things don't.
In real life, if the player doesn't play, we cancel the loan, the trick is to cancel short term loans, which last at least 3 weeks.
In other words, if we don't want to go beyond 32 players, we're obliged to sell players who are in our team that we wanted to keep in order to bring back players that we want to sell, where's the logic in that?
You're killing the game, thank you for spoiling our fun.
Clean up after the cheats, not the good players who don't bend any rules, cancel the event that earns a point and everything's sorted.
In my opinion I find it ridiculous to pay so much for an endu point, I never use it, the only times I have used it was for training players outside my agreement.
I'm very disappointed, sorry I had to say it.

Deactivating the loan reminder is really not a good way of putting an end to the schemes of profiteers who, as with many of the game's functions, hijack certain features.
As usual, all the clubs are losing out on an interesting, not to say necessary, game option because of the 1% of cheats who are easily identifiable.

I think it would have been wiser to provide the admins with a tool that would allow them to view the loan reminders each day and identify the abusive reminders in the list, such as if I do a physical training course and then lend my player to a multi-account who does a physical training course again the next day and I get my player back the day after that.

Meanwhile, donations of players or money via fictitious 100k sales or federations with 5 players from the same club or 10 from the same agreement continue unabated.

It's radical, but it solves several problems at once 👌🏻

And the honest players are still paying the price... How painful.

Wouldn't it have been simpler just to set a disuasive fee, like 5M, to prevent abuse, rather than being so radical as to generate even more abuses?