Eden Hzrd |

6h ago

Hello,

Quite simply, why can we have 5 defenders but not 5 strikers? 🤷🏼‍♂️

That seems to me to be a big imbalance ....


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Fougch |

6h ago

To get the curious talking


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

hazard14 |

6h ago

Eden Hzrd: Bonjour,

Tout simplement, pourquoi on peut mettre 5 défenseurs mais on ne peut pas mettre 5 attaquants ? 🤷🏼‍♂️

Ça me paraît être un gros déséquilibre finalement ….

From what I've read, some people cried and it was forbidden...


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

jul068 |

6h ago

Fougch: Pour faire parler les curieux

The kind of thinking that raises the bar 🙄

Indeed not really logical. It's possible to defend at the end of a game but it's not possible to go all out with 5 up front.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Rull43 |

5h ago

jul068: Le genre de réflexion qui élève le niveau 🙄

Effectivement pas vraiment logique. C’est possible de blinder défensivement en fin de match mais pas possible de tenter le tout pour le tout en alignant 5 éléments devant.

There's only one good proposal, and I can't remember who it was, and that's to make it compulsory to have at least one player per line, attack, midfield or defence.

So 5 def or 5 att ok. But 5-5-0 or 5-0-5 or 0-5-5
That might be a good compromise...


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Pierabou |

3h ago

hazard14: De ce que j'ai lu certains on pleuré et ça à était interdit...

You can't sum it up like that because it's not true.
Ok, val cried, but it was already banned anyway. It's just a bug that's been fixed.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

iMcCarthy77 |

3h ago

Pierabou: Tu ne peux pas résumer a ça car c'est faux.
Ok, val a pleuré, mais c'était de toute façon déjà interdit. C'est juste un bug qui a été corrigé.

Not at all. We've been able to play like this since the creation of the game, it's not a bug, and what's more, you'll notice that it's not an inconsistency when a team is behind, for example in the cup from a corner, how many players are in the box in an attacking position? Many more, I think.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Pierabou |

3h ago

iMcCarthy77: Pas du tout on peut jouer comme ça depuis la création du jeu c’est pas un bug et d’ailleurs tu remarqueras que c’est pas une incohérence quand une équipe est mené par exemple en coupe sur corner tu as combien de joueurs dans la surface en position offensive ? Beaucoup plus je crois

Oh no, but I liked the fact that you could play with 5 people up front.
But Aymeric had already said 2 years ago that it was a bug. I'm not the one making it up 😉


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Misha |

2h ago

The end-of-match rushes, the moments of excitement, the daring strategies... that's what makes us love the game.

I see nothing but advantages in bringing back the 5-a-side attack!


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

DyDyTrix |

1h ago

Fougch: Pour faire parler les curieux

That's for sure, you're less interesting to read than your friend Lebaygue, what's the point of commenting on such nonsense all the time?


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message