Eden Hzrd |

05/08/2025

Hello,

Quite simply, why can we have 5 defenders but not 5 strikers? 🤷🏼‍♂️

That seems to me to be a big imbalance ....


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

hazard14 |

05/08/2025

From what I've read, some people cried and it was forbidden...


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
hazard14 De ce que j'ai lu certains on pleuré et ça à était interdit...

Pierabou |

05/08/2025

You can't sum it up like that because it's not true.
Ok, val cried, but it was already banned anyway. It's just a bug that's been fixed.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
2 more replies
Pierabou Tu ne peux pas résumer a ça car c'est faux. Ok, val a pleuré, mais c'était de toute façon déjà interdit. C'est juste un bug qui a été corrigé.

iMcCarthy77 |

05/08/2025

Not at all. We've been able to play like this since the creation of the game, it's not a bug, and what's more, you'll notice that it's not an inconsistency when a team is behind, for example in the cup from a corner, how many players are in the box in an attacking position? Many more, I think.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
iMcCarthy77 Pas du tout on peut jouer comme ça depuis la création du jeu c’est pas un bug et d’ailleurs tu remarqueras que c’est pas une incohérence quand une équipe est m…

Pierabou |

05/08/2025

Oh no, but I liked the fact that you could play with 5 people up front.
But Aymeric had already said 2 years ago that it was a bug. I'm not the one making it up 😉


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Fougch |

05/08/2025

To get the curious talking


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

jul068 |

05/08/2025

The kind of thinking that raises the bar 🙄

Indeed not really logical. It's possible to defend at the end of a game but it's not possible to go all out with 5 up front.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
jul068 Le genre de réflexion qui élève le niveau 🙄 Effectivement pas vraiment logique. C’est possible de blinder défensivement en fin de match mais pas possible de t…

Rull43 |

05/08/2025

There's only one good proposal, and I can't remember who it was, and that's to make it compulsory to have at least one player per line, attack, midfield or defence.

So 5 def or 5 att ok. But 5-5-0 or 5-0-5 or 0-5-5
That might be a good compromise...


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

DyDyTrix |

06/08/2025

That's for sure, you're less interesting to read than your friend Lebaygue, what's the point of commenting on such nonsense all the time?


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Misha |

06/08/2025

The end-of-match rushes, the moments of excitement, the daring strategies... that's what makes us love the game.

I see nothing but advantages in bringing back the 5-a-side attack!


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Pierabou |

06/08/2025

I agree 100%.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Djaiss |

06/08/2025

You play 90 minutes with 5 up front with your hybrid players 😜 I'm surprised it suits you 😉


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Magikcats |

06/08/2025

Did you try 2 as 3 at?


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Eden Hzrd |

06/08/2025

Yes, it didn't work ... I tried everything 😂


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Eden Hzrd Oui, ça n’a pas fonctionné .. j’ai tout essayé 😂

Magikcats |

07/08/2025

Ok


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message