It's as if it's impossible to get past 5XG in the game despite the number of chances or goals.
#match?mid=6373986&stats
It's a record in ie of all seasons this one is there.

It's true that with such a great opponent, this must go down as one of VF🤣's major moments.

With 44 members in agreement, don't they have anything better than an inactive member at 14 ng?
Points distribution

It's just that his last IE was three days ago. So he was on schedule 11 days ago.

No, I don't think so, I just think that we can accept or schedule free days between the following day and D+9.
In this case, since his last IE was on August 1, he was able to schedule it on July 23 (as a reminder, there are 31 days in July). And 23 July was 12 days ago. He's been offline for 11 days, i.e. 24 July, and was able to schedule all his IEs.

Well, I'm not a rocket scientist, I'll have to check, but it makes sense to me 😅

It seems quite possible to go beyond 5 XG
#match?mid=6396106&score

How about that?
Having an xg at 0.09 each ... having 5 occasions at 0!
Having the text mode is funny when you then see the XG 😆
Or the commentator AND the audience are blind

I don't know whether we can go beyond 5 XGs or not. Personally, I'm one of those people who think that XGs should disappear from this game. They're useless, they don't represent the matches! The only thing they add is frustration. You can even get the same number of chances on both sides and have an xG twice as strong as your opponent!
It does everyone a world of good to see that they should have won.
And to top it all off, there's even a league table with the XGs! How's that for pointless provocation?

I think that the xg are calculated according to the opportunities there are opportunities that are very clear and others that are far from bringing a goal but I do not know if the game takes that into account. The game I shared with you 12-0 doesn't reach 5XG, the other game we've just shared with you 3-0 5.18 XG, what does it actually take into account when calculating these XG?

I find the xG system quite coherent. It depends on the quality of each occasion.

It's just that fouls/cards sometimes add a bit of xG, which isn't very clear. But otherwise for chances, if you understand a bit how it works, you can guess your xG before the end of the match (to within 0.1).

Thank you Galy, thank you Galy, thank you
Thank you Galy, thank you Galy, thank you.

I totally agree that it's pointless and even very often misleading in its translation for certain matches, particularly in terms of the % chances of winning / drawing / losing.

For example, you open the scoring at the very start of the match and then you bet like crazy with 500 in defence without creating the slightest chance and your opponent no more than one or two because, despite having much better overall stats, he can only muster 300 in attack.

At the end of the match, you'll have a very low Xg like your opponent, with a 10 or 15% chance of winning and a 60 or 70% chance of drawing, whereas your real chance of winning was probably close to 80% and the % of drawing was 10 or 15%.

Now, everyone is entitled to believe that this is a great indicator if they want to. And then everyone has the right to believe that they've been the victim of an injustice by fixating on this indicator and then come whining that the actual ranking of their championship doesn't correspond to the corrected ranking where they were well ahead.

WITH 5 ATTACKERS XG NORMALLY EXPLODE 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Soon you won't be allowed to do anything,
4-4-2 or 3-5-2 no other option 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

I misspoke.

You know what the word indicator means. The reality is that I see more of the opposite on the forum. These days, many clubs put forward xGs on a defeat because they should have won 3-0 with a 50% chance.

This remains my opinion, but I have the impression that many clubs give importance to an indicator that is independent of the match engine.

That's still my opinion, but I don't think it brings any more dissatisfaction or incomprehension to clubs starting out.

I have matches with different xG and with a significant difference with the same number of chances. Obviously, if the teams are similar by more or less a certain value, the xG won't translate. But I'd say that if the xG difference is more than 100 points, the stronger team will automatically be declared the winner, whereas the weaker team can win the match (fortunately).

in fact, everything displayed by the MDM generates XGs to a greater or lesser extent. For example, a guy who makes a lot of mistakes will have a few

Not at all. The mdm generates xg continuously, just like in the old days when you could see it rising little by little. It's just that it's no longer displayed, following comments from people who don't understand how a computer programme works, or what expected goals are.

Trying to understand the basis of the XGs provided by the mdm is complicated when you base your explanations on different statistics that are clear or understandable to you. It's complicated to explain them in the same way for every match you analyse.