King |
8 days agoHello,
I don't know if I'm the only one to have noticed this, but isn't there a drastic drop in player prices linked to auctions, for example?
I've noticed 23/24 year old players with 84 to 87 NG going for less than 10M, not to mention the training time of players who had more than 200 days of training. At the time, I felt a bit sorry for the trainers in question, and I wonder if it won't be the same for me and other managers, who choose training in the hope of getting back on their feet financially.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Demi-cerveau |
8 days agoAt the same time, the price of youngsters released at the best of times is skyrocketing at auction.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Teddy |
8 days agoKing: Bonjour,
Je ne sais pas si je suis le seul à l'avoir remarqué, mais n'y a-t-il pas une baisse drastique des prix des joueurs liés à la vente aux enchères par exemple ?
J'ai remarqué des joueurs de 23/24 ans avec 84 à 87 NG partir à moins de 10M , sans compter la durée de formation des joueurs qui comptaient plus de 200 jours de formation. Sur le coup, j'ai eu un peu de peine pour les formateurs en question, et me demande si ce ne sera pas la même pour moi et d'autres managers, qui f
It's time everyone took some responsibility.
The points potential (all characteristics included, with endurance) varies according to age
- 26 years and over: potential around 240 pts
- 24-25 years: around 220 pts
- 21-23 years: maximum 210 pts
An indicative grid for assessing a player's quality:
-> Above 205 pts: excellent training → estimated value of more than 50 M
-> Between 195 and 204 pts: Very good training → value between 40 and 50 M
-> Less than 195 pts: Average player → value less than 40 M
As is often the case, the market reacts with a certain delay. It generally takes 5 to 6 seasons for the masses to integrate the new criteria. What you consider a 'lambda' player today is probably well above what you imagine.
Everyone should take a few moments to adjust to this reality.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Hydilik |
7 days agoPersonally, I have the impression that there is little activity on the transfer markets at the moment, despite the fact that we are at the start of the season..
So, more supply than demand.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
myforsans |
7 days agoBut it's not difficult to understand the main reason for the fall in prices: the big clubs, which sometimes have more than 25 players at NG 99, are beginning to realise that they are getting older and that they need to make room for the future first-team players in their team for the next few seasons, who will be players considered average today.
So they're trying to sell like crazy, but the buyers aren't fooled when the prices on offer are those of 4 or 5 seasons ago. So to make room, they're selling off and for another 2 or 3 seasons they'll be selling off more and more, and as buyers know, .... well, they're not buying or they're buying very little.
Last season there were more than 1,000 players with an NG 99. In two or 3 seasons, there will be barely 200 and in 5 or 6 seasons barely 25 or 30.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Ritter |
7 days agoI have also noticed a drop in prices after the 99 ng in 4 seasons there will be almost no more. Everything will go back to normal with the potentials. What was not normal is that a 79 potential becomes a 95 ng. I notice that my players in training with 80 potential and more are at the right level of development, for example an 81 potential will become an 83, which is much more logical for everyone. When you see teams with 99 ng players with 79 potential, it's not normal. We're going to have to go back to the drawing board, which I think is good for the game. No more big teams with more than 1100 state.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Sun's |
7 days agoRitter: Effectivement je constate aussi une baisse des prix après les 99 ng dans 4 saison il en n aura presque plus. Tout va redevenir a la normale avec les potentiels. Ce qui n était pas normal c est q un 79 potentiel devient un 95 ng . Je constate que mes joueurs en formation de 80 potentiel et plus sont dans leurs bon niveau de développement exemple un 81 potentiel va devenir un 83 de note ce qui et beaucoup plus logique pour tout le monde. Quand tu vois des équipes avec des joueurs 99 ng avec po
It should be pointed out that 99s are generally resold just before regression, especially those as you say with 80- potential, given that the Staff base their maximum on potential + 3 seasons of seniority
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
khad19 |
7 days agoUnlike 85/87 NGs under the age of 25, prices are skyrocketing at auction. Prices easily exceed 30 million.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
King |
6 days agoTeddy: Il est temps que chacun prenne un peu ses responsabilités.
Le potentiel en points (toutes caractéristiques incluses, avec endurance) varie selon l'âge
- 26 ans et plus : potentiel autour de 240 pts
- 24-25 ans : environ 220 pts
- 21-23 ans : maximum 210 pts
Une grille indicative pour évaluer la qualité d’un joueur :
-> Au-dessus de 205 pts : Formation excellente → valeur estimée à plus de 50 M
-> Entre 195 et 204 pts : Très bonne formation → valeur entre 40 et 50 M
-> Moins de 19
What do you mean by points my teddy?
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Teddy |
6 days agoTotal number of points on a player at the end of training.
The 26 and over age group benefited from a more significant development. The 24-25 age group benefited over one or two seasons. Below that, regular training is much lower.
The new standard will be 90NG with 15-20 in endurance.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Tazz26 |
6 days agoSo today's 26+ year olds will be better off at 35 than today's 22/23 year olds at the same time... so we shouldn't be too worried about the 22/23 year olds ^^
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
myforsans |
6 days agoTazz26: Donc les 26 ans et plus d'aujourd'hui seront meilleurs a 35 ans que la nouvelle génération 22/23 d'aujourd'hui au même moment.. faut pas trop s'affoler sur les jeunes 22/23 du coup ^^
You're getting ahead of yourself. Who can predict that in the space of 9 seasons there won't be another unforeseen reworking of training efficiency or an underwater drop in NGs deemed excessive that will wipe out your prediction?
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Teddy |
6 days agoAymeric will let the game stabilise, but there are no guarantees 😅
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Mide |
5 days agoKing: Bonjour,
Je ne sais pas si je suis le seul à l'avoir remarqué, mais n'y a-t-il pas une baisse drastique des prix des joueurs liés à la vente aux enchères par exemple ?
J'ai remarqué des joueurs de 23/24 ans avec 84 à 87 NG partir à moins de 10M , sans compter la durée de formation des joueurs qui comptaient plus de 200 jours de formation. Sur le coup, j'ai eu un peu de peine pour les formateurs en question, et me demande si ce ne sera pas la même pour moi et d'autres managers, qui f
I have made ridiculous losses because of this. A player I bought for 17M at 17, after training he was sold for 7-8M I have many other cases like these. It’s sad and I don’t know what to do.
Zeus |
5 days agoMide: I have made ridiculous losses because of this. A player I bought for 17M at 17, after training he was sold for 7-8M I have many other cases like these. It’s sad and I don’t know what to do.
That's the game, my poor Lucette
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Rull43 |
5 days agoMide: What does lucette mean?
Nothing, it's a name like Paul or George.
He used an old expression to say that's life
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
papaulochines |
5 days agoDescompromisso c/ a banca ou a bandeira tem influência no campo dos pretendentes ao meta ⚽