Now that's a determined guy.

I I I I I I
You should rename your club FC Humble 😏😉

Blah, blah, blah.
To remind you, I beat the top of the VF ranking in IE last season. And I was the only one.
He was fair play, as I've always been with active managers. You can tell the 5 other managers I did my IS to.
It doesn't matter, you lose, you win, you stay human. It's just a game.

He didn't accept that he'd lost logically because he was simply very bad tactically.

Typical of the kind of comment you criticise. A bit of a shame to post this too. And come down a floor, it's not melon season but carrot season!

1. CP
2. LR
3. LV
4. NV
5. AFU

Hi there,
We understand you had a problem with our coach last season, you've just said so 20 times in 3 messages.
Now I'd like you to stop quoting the circle all the time, please.
Have a good season.

And don't you think it would have been fair play to MP our President to discuss the matter directly with him and the person concerned?

The LVs are still going strong. Your coach is very strong. The top3 is logical and also thanks to the loyalty of you LV members

They're not cheating players... watch out for the abuse of language. And personally, I don't foresee any change between the top of the league after the big 99NG teams disappear. The CPs have matured and they'll have to manage their formation rotation, but I can't see the LVs overtaking everyone else as things stand. We'll probably need something more.

Did I mention the lv that passes everyone else?
Not at all.
I'm just saying that the gap will be much smaller than it is now.
Scuse me but when you see players with 120ng and 50 endu for me it's cheat

Mouais I'm more afraid of the manager than his team. There's no shortage of 99+ grunts.

A respectable opinion, of course.
But there's also the possibility that if the managers/ententes managed to perform as well and stand out on the old training module, they can also do so on the new one.
So the gap can remain the same with players who are just generally less strong for everyone, they'll be training 95 NG 20 endurance when the others will be training 85 NG 10 endurance.

I feel the same way about it... and I'll never understand why pointing the finger at something that EVERYONE could do at the same time. You just had to catch the train at the right time, as is often the case on VF. Anyway.

I more or less agree with you, of course the big guys will stay big, and for several reasons. It's just that things are going to get a lot tighter at the back.
There will be a lot more teams between 85 and 90ng with decent stamina (from 15 to 22/23 years old, so let's say around 20 at their full potential). As we've seen, with the mdm, having players with 230pts was sometimes not enough, so here you'll have players with 190 points for the best, compared with players with an average of 170/175 pts. The gap is minimal, especially as today's big teams have players with 99ng in 2 positions, which has become unfeasible. This will automatically lead to fewer tactical choices. The gap will be reduced.
The top 10 will vary slightly, but behind that it will be a fierce battle, or so José hopes. Of course, we'll see the same teams represented again, but a club that might be top 100 today, if it follows the right trend, could well claim to be in the top 20 (by which I mean a 'normal' club that knows its stuff tactically speaking).
A 99ng ++ team that wins its games 3-1 today might go 2-2 in the next few games. But that's just my opinion and I don't think I'm far wrong.
Time will tell, but all the better if it opens doors for some, and the big boys will stay big once again!

You have to look at the instructions and tactically you will understand how tactically your coach was below when you talk about the last is.
Even some of your members said on the day that he had a bad game. You have to accept that. If you finish in 2-5-3 and you get a -110 in short passes and then you dominate like +60 in creative play, it's no surprise to get a second goal.

As for the other message, I've already spoken to one of your managers. Full stop.
Your coach began the provocation, did not apologize, so I responded footballistically on this topic.

Stop taking it out on me before I get angry.
Story closed.

The merger between Sweet Victory and Nexus is beneficial in that it competes with the dominance of LR and CP. Above all, it means that there is more agreement among those who play the title role.
Then there's LV, which is making a good comeback and could do something this season.
The IS are important and will play a lot again this season.
The AFU have done brilliantly to finish top5, and can continue their progress right to the end. They could also snatch another top 5 finish at the last minute.

Something else I remember from season 140,
The CPs did almost all the IEs earlier than the LRs.
Something that perhaps strategically was not seen, given the battle for maintenance in which several agreements have done a lot of IE the last two weeks.
The LR, which missed a dozen IE in the last 10 days, took advantage of this and logically won a maximum of points.
The AFU also took advantage of the situation, and were therefore awarded 5th place in the agreement.
After that, it's a toss-up, knowing that some seasons, it would be the opposite, a battle for the top 3 for most of the last ie.

After that, there are other factors that count too, but you have to write novels. I've already written too much.

Have a good season.

If you look at the stats from the game you'll see that your win and the 2 goals are very low, hence my reasoning (possession also for him throughout the game). Whether he had a good or bad game, I didn't say that your win was undeserved, just that in the logic of the stats the game should have ended differently, for example 1-1, and after what happened between you after the game I think that it can be settled other than on the forum. As for the rest, you're right about the other agreements, but as I said, we'll be involved in the battle for the league table. Personally, I hope the TGV return to D1, so have a good season.
image](https://i.imgur.com/AshQNzD.jpeg)

The xg no longer mean anything I assure you.
In ie we had several members with a xg 2 and the opponent 0,2 and our members lost.

I give you reason that until the 80th or the 1-1 deserves but tactically it opened a boulevard in defense, so the opportunity to take a second goal by making a big tactical error.
The first goal was because I was 65 minutes non-stop on the counter-attack after a controlled start to the game. Then, as the match progressed, his enduring players, faced with a team made up of 4 players under 90 minutes, didn't help me. It's also linked to tiredness that my players were cracking the other is (we don't have any hardy players).

with a squad like that, playing with +60 in creative play with alternating counter-attacks in the second half is very weak when you're up against a team like mine. What I didn't understand was that he should have analysed (as the LV had done) the other IS of the coach opposite and therefore made a composition Short passes. And the score, I'm telling you, would have been quite the opposite.
In short, this isn't the topic, but it's good to discuss tactics and have a good season

Please start from the beginning

Only sister agreements 😅 the Gauls will try to foil your prediction 😉

So there...🙂‍↔️
Out of the top 8 for rtg2 I note 😜

That's true