And now, to continue in the tradition of the tried and tested. Let's launch post season 141.

#match?mid=6261048&stats

Knowing that I was playing the same team the day before, giving them a 7-0, with fewer NGs, and slightly less difference in stats (around +600 on the fly). On VF, +600 isn't enough, it makes for a tight match.
Oh, and I forgot, the opponent played with 10 men because of a red card.
Poisson's law :)

A nice grated carrot 😂😂

If you'd had that player, it would never have happened!
I'm just saying 😏🤭😇
Deleted player

Your new season is off to a good start xD

Isn't it the exceptional quality of the opponent?
One day I'll really teach you tactics for this game...
Have a good Sunday.

Oooooh, here comes little sister!
#match?mid=6282576&stats
image](https://i.imgur.com/fjUZbxD.png)

So a sequence of two games in which, with +600 stats, possession averaging 85% and an attack that was almost three times as good as the opposition's defence in every area, the result was 0-0
9.5 xG in two games, zero goals.
We've drawn 2.8% of our games and 3.0% of our matches in a row.
The argument of the team that achieves the feat, or of "if we replay this match 100 times you'll win it 99 times", well that just proves that it's nonsense.

And then Aymeric tells us that everything's fine, and can't work out what's wrong with the MDM...

Basically, it's as if my team had missed 8 penalties in 2 games, isn't it? (if the XG for a penalty is close to 1)

Don't complain, according to the theory of conspiracy, Pythagoras and Thales following the guidelines of fish law and factorial inequalities and well the wheel always turns eventually 😎😘

Sorry Facom I thought you would be the future winner of the LDC but there.... you found much stronger than you 😱

RIP to your opponent tomorrow, he's going to take at least 5 🤣