Colombpal85 |

12 days ago

Hello,

An improvement project that's going to cause a bit of a stir, but I'd like to propose it anyway haha

An end-of-season tax of 5% on finances.
You should know that this doesn't suit me at all as I have a lot of money in the bank, BUT!

The point:
Boost the transfer market
Lower transfer market taxes
Increase various bonuses such as competition bonuses

I'm proposing this just to get the community's opinion on the concept, because to tell you the truth I find competition bonuses pretty low and the transfer market pretty poor.

I'm waiting for opinions, especially yours Lulo! :)


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

lens59 |

12 days ago

We're taxed enough as it is, and I wouldn't call it an improvement project myself


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

maradonald |

12 days ago

An annual tax on profits or cash flow?


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Adrimax |

12 days ago

In my opinion, if you want to revive the transfer market, you absolutely have to remove the taxes on purchase and resale and affinity, which are a real pain.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Lebaygue |

12 days ago

Personally, I'm waiting for Olivier Truchot's opinion... even if I already know him.
You listen, inadvertently or out of sadism or because you have no choice, to BFM, RMC, you quit your job, you go on VF and bam, there you go again, it's the same on Vfo as on the news channels.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Colombpal85 |

12 days ago

maradonald: Une taxe annuelle sur les bénéfices ou la trésorerie ?

Not profits, cash flow hehe, that's where I get the wrath of everyone 🤣


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

k3vin59218 |

12 days ago

There's already tax on sales, that's true

A tax just on the season even 5% can be huge for some (which is not my case) 😆 I'm poor at the end of each season!
Mais 5% sur un budget final disons de 50M , ca fait une perte de 2.5M c'est leger mais quand meme lol


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Magik'jojo |

12 days ago

Against! Too much tax kills tax


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Blagoje Vidinic |

12 days ago

I have absolutely no idea what this idea would bring "to the market", as you put it.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Le croc |

12 days ago

Bruno lemaire sors de ce corps


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

lens59 |

12 days ago

Question ❓️ taxes ok that's normal
mais où va l'argent dans les finances/f frais du jeu divers dotation de coupe , champions ect....
Does the game have unlimited funds or does it have a maximum financial ceiling and taxed funds keep the game running?


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Ancelloti |

12 days ago

You'll need to expand a little


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

PEPSI |

12 days ago

Could this be an idea from the new government? Where there's money to be found, there's money to be found!


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

wildzap |

12 days ago

What does tax mean?


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

jul068 |

12 days ago

A very good idea. But with the opposite possibility of making +5% on cash flow by using the store.

Humour


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

steril |

12 days ago

Blagoje Vidinic: Je ne comprends absolument pas ce que cette idée apporterait « au marché » comme tu dis.

As Popeye says: I'll explain it to you


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

junior |

12 days ago

I don't see how taxing will boost the market....contre completely


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Drezzo35 |

12 days ago

Adrimax: Pour moi si tu veux relancer le marché des transferts il faut absolument retirer les taxes sur l'achat revente et l'affinité qui est quand même bien pénible.

Reducing taxes on resale purchases, yes
The affinity not although perhaps to lower the importance of this one, in the direction which I find not normal when titu ng80 green affinity brings more than one ng99 without affinity, it is a little annoying because on the principle it is to change precisely to reinforce your team

As far as the project is concerned, I'm absolutely against it, I don't see the point at all in terms of the market


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Nicularo |

12 days ago

A 5% tax would take almost 110M off my wallet... No thanks 😅


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Kirikou |

12 days ago

I am simply against


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Magik'jojo |

12 days ago

Nicularo: Une taxe de 5% m’enlèverait presque 110M… Non merci 😅

And me 50k no thanks lol


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Sikora |

12 days ago

That's why the transfer market is so depressed. On the other hand, I wouldn't touch affinity, which adds a very interesting dimension to workforce management.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Adrimax |

12 days ago

Why do you find the affinity interesting...? I find it hard to understand. Personally, I don't enjoy waiting x amount of time for the affinity to reach its maximum.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

lens59 |

12 days ago

Originally the idea of a manager was that affinity was a PLUS, but it's completely the opposite.
Affinités 100% tu auras le ng origine I don't see how that was an improvement project.
Sometimes interesting ideas are not ideas that turn out the right way


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Azby |

12 days ago

I think it's great for building and renewing your players, it forces you to make choices.

But there's still room for improvement and it's worth learning more about it online and in columns.

On the other hand, it's a big part of the market's downfall. I'd have had a bad experience of it if I'd been buying and selling.

In terms of pure management, I find it interesting.

As for the basic subject: no thanks, no way.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Demi-cerveau |

12 days ago

As it happens, affinity clearly doesn't help the dynamism of the market. To take a concrete example, I used to train players who regularly joined my senior team. Every season, 2 or 3 players would join my senior team and 2 or 3 others would be sold. From now on, my A team is locked, nothing comes in, nothing goes out, otherwise I lose 250 stats at the start of each season. Until the day I make them all leave at the same time. I end up having to work with a generation of players of the same age, something I didn't want to do in the first place.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

myforsans |

12 days ago

Adrimax: En quoi vous trouvez l'affinité intéressante ...? J'ai du mal à saisir. Personnellement je ne prend pas de plaisir d'attendre x temps pour que l'affinité soit maximale.

Affinity is a very interesting innovation that forces you to think about how you manage your squad over time, so it's a step in the right direction.
And for all those who advocate ultra-realism in the game (which I'm not), it's also a step in the right direction.
What's more, the settings aren't too bad and the penalty for lack of affinity fades fairly quickly as the rate of affinity acquisition is logarithmic.
If the transfer market is rather amorphous at the moment, that's for another reason. If you look hard enough, I think you'll easily find it.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Brutus |

11 days ago

It should be done like income tax, with levels:

  • 5% for -100M in banks
    -10% -500M
  • 20% -1MM
    ...
    ...
    ...

I admit it could be fun! ^^


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Jallow |

11 days ago

Basically, I'm in favour of increasing bonuses for competitions and against taxes!


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Brutus |

11 days ago

"Workers, you are being robbed..."


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Nicularo |

11 days ago

Brutus: Faudrait faire comme l'impôt sur le revenu avec des palliers :

  • -5% pour les -100M en banques
  • -10% -500M
  • -20% -1MM
    ...
    ...
    ...

J'avoue ça peut être sympa ! ^^

But what's the point? You're going to take 20% (!!!) off a guy who's got 1MM, and he's going to be left with 800M, and then what? He's supposed to spend all his cash to get close to 0 so he doesn't pay any tax? It makes no sense 😅


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

junior |

11 days ago

Wouldn't it be better to have interest on invested money instead of tax 😅


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Jallow |

11 days ago

junior: On pourrait pas plutôt avoir des intérêts sur argent placé au lieu de taxé 😅

Like the VF League paid you 10m 😁


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Sikora |

11 days ago

Demi-cerveau: Pour le coup l'affinité n'aide clairement pas au dynamisme du marché. Si je prends mon exemple concret, avant, je formais des joueurs qui integraient régulièrement mon équipe A. Chaque saison, 2 ou 3 joueurs entraient dans ma A, 2 ou 3 autres étaient vendus. Désormais, ma A est verrouillée, rien n'entre, rien ne sort, sinon je perds 250 de stats au début de chaque saison. Jusqu'au jour où je les ferai tous partir en même temps. Je me retrouve à devoir fonctionner avec une génératio

Not necessarily.
For my part, I work by line. Every season I renew either the defence or my midfield. They spend a season in the second team before joining the first team.
That allows me to manage my expenditure better and have a development strategy.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

VALENCIANO |

11 days ago

on the other hand, it's only going to ruin the clubs even more and it's never going to boost the transfer market


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Vrael Zendo |

11 days ago

Demi-cerveau: Pour le coup l'affinité n'aide clairement pas au dynamisme du marché. Si je prends mon exemple concret, avant, je formais des joueurs qui integraient régulièrement mon équipe A. Chaque saison, 2 ou 3 joueurs entraient dans ma A, 2 ou 3 autres étaient vendus. Désormais, ma A est verrouillée, rien n'entre, rien ne sort, sinon je perds 250 de stats au début de chaque saison. Jusqu'au jour où je les ferai tous partir en même temps. Je me retrouve à devoir fonctionner avec une génératio

Technically, now that affinity progresses in training, you can gradually renew your team without losing stats...


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Brutus |

11 days ago

Nicularo: Mais quel est l’intérêt ? Tu vas enlever 20% (!!!) d’un mec qui a 1MM, il va lui rester 800M derrière, puis après ? Il est censé dépenser tout son cash pour être proche de 0 pour ne payer aucune taxe ? Ça n’a aucun sens 😅

It was a joke, Nicularo, which is why I exaggerated the percentages!


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

lens59 |

11 days ago

Humour/ vf 🤔🤔🤫🤫


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Zeus |

11 days ago

Vrael Zendo: Techniquement maintenant l'affinité progresse à l'entraînement, tu peux tout à fait renouveler progressivement ton équipe sans perdre en stats...

Except that you need a minimum number of days and that takes time


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Lulo |

11 days ago

It might be a good idea to tax the rich a bit, but why give more to competitions and lower taxes on players? In the end, the prize money from competitions will be given to the best club (rich) and the lower transfer tax will only be interesting for players worth 60-80m (rich) because small transfers worth 2m are taxed (200k is equivalent to the ticket price of a match, even for new players), so it only benefits the rich

So you take from the rich to give to the rich and the poor will be poorer (the principle of our society). In the end it's just saying to the club to spend your money, it's just going to break the market and break the balance that Aymeric is looking for on the finances of VF. And what's more, it'll only help those who are in a state of flux between the treasury and the players. The savers will be the only losers.

Because if that's the case for me personally, I'm going to set up a cartel, put my millions (or more) into a fund, and then I'm going to lose


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Hydilik |

11 days ago

Hello everyone

To be tested over a few seasons, but perhaps the number of players per club should be increased. Go from 32 to 35 players to see if this can boost the transfer market.

Affinity makes people reluctant to sell and playing styles require a few more players to be more versatile


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Alexandre67310 |

11 days ago

Totally against it. It would ruin a good number of clubs that invest per generation and like to keep their squad for 15 seasons and save for a new generation.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

BadYste |

10 days ago

On the other hand, some players spend as soon as they have three pennies.
As far as I'm concerned, I'm more in cycle mode. I've left my league and my old team is enough to move up the divisions. That allows me to save money. Once I'm back in D1, I'm in a position to buy, but with affinities, it's complicated, a new player is bad for one season, hence the interest in sacrificing another season, let me explain: you renew a large part of the senior team, for one season they're not very competitive, and then it's back to work.
So you need to build up a little cash to choose the right moment to spend it all. With taxes on capital, there's no way of doing that. You have to leave it up to each individual to manage his or her own game - that's what a management game is all about, isn't it?


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

leakcim58 |

10 days ago

Wow. Nice inspiration! You work for Aymeric? You're not going to give him any good ideas for running the vfstore.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Zeus |

6 days ago

He's always talking rubbish.
He wanted to put on a show


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

villa |

6 days ago

Zeus: Non mais façon, lui il sort des conneries à chaque fois.
Il a voulu se donner en spectacles

Who are you talking about?


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Colombpal85 |

6 days ago

Zeus: Non mais façon, lui il sort des conneries à chaque fois.
Il a voulu se donner en spectacles

Who are you talking about?


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Teddy |

6 days ago

Zeus: Non mais façon, lui il sort des conneries à chaque fois.
Il a voulu se donner en spectacles

Who are you talking about?


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Demi-cerveau |

6 days ago

There's so many people coming out with bullshit every time, everyone wonders which one he's talking about 🫣.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

lens59 |

6 days ago

He's talking about the other 🤔🤔🤔


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message