Hello,

An improvement project that's going to cause a bit of a stir, but I'd like to propose it anyway haha

An end-of-season tax of 5% on finances.
You should know that this doesn't suit me at all as I have a lot of money in the bank, BUT!

The point:
Boost the transfer market
Lower transfer market taxes
Increase various bonuses such as competition bonuses

I'm proposing this just to get the community's opinion on the concept, because to tell you the truth I find competition bonuses pretty low and the transfer market pretty poor.

I'm waiting for opinions, especially yours Lulo! :)

We're taxed enough as it is, and I wouldn't call it an improvement project myself

An annual tax on profits or cash flow?

In my opinion, if you want to revive the transfer market, you absolutely have to remove the taxes on purchase and resale and affinity, which are a real pain.

Personally, I'm waiting for Olivier Truchot's opinion... even if I already know him.
You listen, inadvertently or out of sadism or because you have no choice, to BFM, RMC, you quit your job, you go on VF and bam, there you go again, it's the same on Vfo as on the news channels.

There's already tax on sales, that's true

A tax just on the season even 5% can be huge for some (which is not my case) 😆 I'm poor at the end of each season!
Mais 5% sur un budget final disons de 50M , ca fait une perte de 2.5M c'est leger mais quand meme lol

Against! Too much tax kills tax

I have absolutely no idea what this idea would bring "to the market", as you put it.

Bruno lemaire sors de ce corps

Question ❓️ taxes ok that's normal
mais où va l'argent dans les finances/f frais du jeu divers dotation de coupe , champions ect....
Does the game have unlimited funds or does it have a maximum financial ceiling and taxed funds keep the game running?

You'll need to expand a little

Could this be an idea from the new government? Where there's money to be found, there's money to be found!

What does tax mean?

A very good idea. But with the opposite possibility of making +5% on cash flow by using the store.

Humour

I don't see how taxing will boost the market....contre completely

A 5% tax would take almost 110M off my wallet... No thanks 😅

I am simply against

That's why the transfer market is so depressed. On the other hand, I wouldn't touch affinity, which adds a very interesting dimension to workforce management.

Why do you find the affinity interesting...? I find it hard to understand. Personally, I don't enjoy waiting x amount of time for the affinity to reach its maximum.

Originally the idea of a manager was that affinity was a PLUS, but it's completely the opposite.
Affinités 100% tu auras le ng origine I don't see how that was an improvement project.
Sometimes interesting ideas are not ideas that turn out the right way

I think it's great for building and renewing your players, it forces you to make choices.

But there's still room for improvement and it's worth learning more about it online and in columns.

On the other hand, it's a big part of the market's downfall. I'd have had a bad experience of it if I'd been buying and selling.

In terms of pure management, I find it interesting.

As for the basic subject: no thanks, no way.

As it happens, affinity clearly doesn't help the dynamism of the market. To take a concrete example, I used to train players who regularly joined my senior team. Every season, 2 or 3 players would join my senior team and 2 or 3 others would be sold. From now on, my A team is locked, nothing comes in, nothing goes out, otherwise I lose 250 stats at the start of each season. Until the day I make them all leave at the same time. I end up having to work with a generation of players of the same age, something I didn't want to do in the first place.

It should be done like income tax, with levels:

• 5% for -100M in banks
  -10% -500M
• 20% -1MM
  ...
  ...
  ...

I admit it could be fun! ^^

Basically, I'm in favour of increasing bonuses for competitions and against taxes!

"Workers, you are being robbed..."

Wouldn't it be better to have interest on invested money instead of tax 😅

on the other hand, it's only going to ruin the clubs even more and it's never going to boost the transfer market

Humour/ vf 🤔🤔🤫🤫

It might be a good idea to tax the rich a bit, but why give more to competitions and lower taxes on players? In the end, the prize money from competitions will be given to the best club (rich) and the lower transfer tax will only be interesting for players worth 60-80m (rich) because small transfers worth 2m are taxed (200k is equivalent to the ticket price of a match, even for new players), so it only benefits the rich

So you take from the rich to give to the rich and the poor will be poorer (the principle of our society). In the end it's just saying to the club to spend your money, it's just going to break the market and break the balance that Aymeric is looking for on the finances of VF. And what's more, it'll only help those who are in a state of flux between the treasury and the players. The savers will be the only losers.

Because if that's the case for me personally, I'm going to set up a cartel, put my millions (or more) into a fund, and then I'm going to lose

Hello everyone

To be tested over a few seasons, but perhaps the number of players per club should be increased. Go from 32 to 35 players to see if this can boost the transfer market.

Affinity makes people reluctant to sell and playing styles require a few more players to be more versatile

Totally against it. It would ruin a good number of clubs that invest per generation and like to keep their squad for 15 seasons and save for a new generation.

On the other hand, some players spend as soon as they have three pennies.
As far as I'm concerned, I'm more in cycle mode. I've left my league and my old team is enough to move up the divisions. That allows me to save money. Once I'm back in D1, I'm in a position to buy, but with affinities, it's complicated, a new player is bad for one season, hence the interest in sacrificing another season, let me explain: you renew a large part of the senior team, for one season they're not very competitive, and then it's back to work.
So you need to build up a little cash to choose the right moment to spend it all. With taxes on capital, there's no way of doing that. You have to leave it up to each individual to manage his or her own game - that's what a management game is all about, isn't it?

Wow. Nice inspiration! You work for Aymeric? You're not going to give him any good ideas for running the vfstore.

He's always talking rubbish.
He wanted to put on a show

There's so many people coming out with bullshit every time, everyone wonders which one he's talking about 🫣.

He's talking about the other 🤔🤔🤔

The expression c'est jamais deux sans Troyes

Thanks toumas. No need to explain. You've understood everything.

Yes, it's clear!

So, just to clarify the thing about being fed up with pay to win and no matter what the game xDl (note that I'm not necessarily pro pay to win or pro F2P)
By definition, a game is a product (virtual or not) of an entertainment company.
When you say business, you necessarily mean profitability, because ... that's just the law, it seems to me that selling at a loss is punishable by law (to go further, I think it comes under the heading of unfair competition).
In short, to be profitable with an online video game, you need ... people to put money into it... and so inevitably you need pay to win games that take IG stuff (whether it's cosmetics or players for VF for example) lol
It doesn't matter how F2Pers see it, it's just a fact of life, a video game is a product of a company / business and so, under criminal law, it has to answer to the tax authorities lol (yes, even for VF or ... the baker just around the corner lol) and so you have to make money xD (at least to cover costs lol) otherwise ... the game simply dies xD