Djaiss |
13 days agoHello everyone,
Detection is time-consuming and, over the last few seasons, the results have been very poor 🥺 It's been a few seasons now that the most I've found is 1 or 2 81 potentials at the most. This also has a cost (going to a country, changing cities, offering a contract,...).
I understand that this is limited in time and number of clicks to avoid abuse, but here the best potentials present after spending many hours to detect are very (too) low.
There is currently a better chance of finding a good potential (above 80) by sending your recruiter (just click and pray 🙏). Some receive potentials well above 81 potential, it's rarer but over a season, you can send your recruiter 7 times. A friend of mine got 2 85 potentials in the same season... And a potential 82😅
Wouldn't it be better to "reward" those who scan the cities for hours on end and scatter potential players in each country who are at least as high as the best players found by the scout?
I'm putting this down here... 🙄😁
Thanks in advance for your feedback 😉
Djaiss
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Magpie |
13 days agoSubject & arguments already raised in the last audio with Aymeric.
That led to the situation you describe...
And I think your opinion is shared by many. The cursor is in the wrong place.
But that hasn't changed despite the comments. Good luck! :)
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Teddy |
13 days agoGet ready what thinks detection will go up lol😆.
I can see the recruiter going down more 😅
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
ManuM |
13 days agoTeddy: Préparez-vous ce qui pense que la détection va monter lol😆.
Je vois plus le recruteur descendre 😅
Not necessarily to go down, but that the potential 85s that the recruiter brings back are rarer, because then detection is no longer useful.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Teddy |
13 days agoAymeric's main aim was to reduce the probability of finding good players, but not too much to reduce the levels that could be found, as he had said in the last few audio clips.
I think he wanted to prevent one person from supplying youngsters to several clubs. I think that's a shame because it opens up possibilities for agreements in terms of mutual assistance.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
lens59 |
13 days agoGiven that there are so many countries and a limited number every 6 hours unless you spend your life detecting.
The positions are limited in a starting 11 unless you lose 1 ng by changing position.
You really have to have Q to fall on an 80+
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Clamsii |
13 days agoIt's simple, for me it's been 2 seasons that I haven't got anything back from detection, very disturbing when you're a nation ^^
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
OMstar83 |
13 days agoClamsii: C'est simple moi ça fait 2 saisons que je ne récupère plus rien en detection, très dérangeant quand on fait une nation ^^
Come to the Nexus, I'll guarantee you 3 good youngsters per season, and I'll put Adrimax on the scouting team for you.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
khad19 |
13 days agoVery disturbing indeed when you're doing a nation + maximising potential (not having a level 10 cdf yet). It's even more profitable for me, I've stopped, it's better to send your scout once a week than to spam the detections from now on. You're going to find 1 or 2 interesting players max per season.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Lulo |
13 days agoOf course, a few seasons ago, potential 80s were the norm and all the clubs ended up with 10 or more potential 80s players. That broke the market. Today we're back to where we were before, with potential players closer to 81 max and potential 78 as the norm. I think that's fine too. The people who are motivated will be able to have potentials of 81 and the others 78 or so, and that will simply lead to a better reward for the researchers because the ngs of 81 or more will have a real price on the transfer market.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
lens59 |
13 days agoPersonally, I've done some nations a favour with my youngsters but I can't find anything for myself 🙄🙄🙄
I'm not in a bad way in terms of cdf but attacking is becoming complicated 😆
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Teddy |
13 days agoLulo: Après c’est voulu que ça soit plus compliqué, forcément il y a quelques saison les potentiels 80 c’etait la normalité et tous les clubs se sont retrouvés avec 10joueurs potentiels 80 ou plus. Ça a cassé le marché. Aujourd’hui on retourne comme avant, avec des potentiels plus proche des 81 max et des potentiels 78 comme normalité. Je pense que c’est très bien aussi comme ça. Les gens qui sont motivés pourront avoir des potentiels à 81 et les autres 78 environ et ca va permet
It's hard to find a 78... it's complicated lol
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Djaiss |
13 days agoLulo: Après c’est voulu que ça soit plus compliqué, forcément il y a quelques saison les potentiels 80 c’etait la normalité et tous les clubs se sont retrouvés avec 10joueurs potentiels 80 ou plus. Ça a cassé le marché. Aujourd’hui on retourne comme avant, avec des potentiels plus proche des 81 max et des potentiels 78 comme normalité. Je pense que c’est très bien aussi comme ça. Les gens qui sont motivés pourront avoir des potentiels à 81 et les autres 78 environ et ca va permet
Mouais mais impossible de lutter contre le 99G Qqui étaient censé disparaître ou autres extra-terrestres à consigne 🙄
I'm old-fashioned, I train very classically 😅 it's a choice 🤷🏻♂️
But the gulf shouldn't be so wide between those who train the old-fashioned way and the tinkerers (excuse the term) 🤔
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
lens59 |
13 days agoDjaiss |
13 days agolens59: Les 99 dans quelques saison il y en aura plus
I feel like I've been reading this for ages and there are still legions of them 🤔
And when they're not 99NGs, they're players who have even more impact than a 99NG because boosted on instructions/styles so for me, the problem has been circumvented to be even worse 😂
Each to their own kiff on this game but then makes the odds balanced by offering valid potentials ⚖️
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
lens59 |
13 days agoComplicated detection +80
Endurance compulsory given the fatigue
I deduce that there won't be many competitive 99s once the 25/26 year olds retire.
You'll have 99s but with 5/8 Endurance at half-time or even before they'll be very tired
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
hazard14 |
13 days agoDjaiss: J'ai l'impression de lire ça depuis des lustres et ils sont légion encore 🤔
Et quand ce ne sont pas des 99NG, ce sont des joueurs qui ont encore plus d'impact qu'un 99NG car boostés sur des consignes/styles donc pour moi, le problème a été contourné pour être encore pire 😂
Chacun son kiff sur ce jeu mais alors faut équilibrer les chances en proposant des potentiels valables à ceux qui prennent le temps de détecter des heures durant 🧐
I have a 99ng team and I totally agree with you. I can't wait for the big ng99s to leave because I don't even think you need to be tactically good to win. With everyone on the same team, the difference would be much clearer
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Djaiss |
13 days agohazard14: J'ai une équipe 99ng et je suis pourtant total d'accord avec toi. Vivement que les gros ng99 partent car il y a même plus besoin d'être bon tactiquement pour gagner je trouve. Avec tout le monde à la même enseigne on verrai beaucoup mieux la différence
Wait a minute, as I said earlier, it's not just the 99NGs that are getting out of hand, it's all the players who have been boosted to the max with instructions/styles 😶
Hats off to those who have got round the trick because the game allows them to but you have to accept that there are several styles (ouuuuh) of manager 🤓
A rebalancing seems necessary to me ⚖️
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
hazard14 |
13 days agoDjaiss: Attends, comme dit précédemment, ce ne sont pas seulement les 99NG qui foutent le brin, il y a tous les joueurs boostés consignes/styles à outrance 😶 je connais des clubs qui ont même le luxe d'avoir un 11 de 99NG et un autre 11 avec ces joueurs hybrides 🤖
Chapeau a ceux qui ont contourné le truc car le jeu le leur permet mais il faut accepter qu'il y ait plusieurs styles (ouuuuh) de managers 🤓
Un rééquilibrage me semble nécessaire ⚖️
Aymeric has already greatly reduced the impact of the styles.
I don't mind the styles, they're part of the game, but 99ngs with 30 to 50 d endu how can you compete with that, it's really quite complicated
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Teddy |
13 days agohazard14: J'ai une équipe 99ng et je suis pourtant total d'accord avec toi. Vivement que les gros ng99 partent car il y a même plus besoin d'être bon tactiquement pour gagner je trouve. Avec tout le monde à la même enseigne on verrai beaucoup mieux la différence
😅 you're going to be disappointed lol
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
hazard14 |
13 days agoTeddy |
13 days agohazard14: Je serai pas le seul 😉
It's not the first time we've changed and the good ones with 99s are still good with 90s 🤣. The bad ones too, I think
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
hazard14 |
13 days agoTeddy: C'est pas la première fois qu'on change et les bons avec des 99 restent bon avec des 90 🤣. Les mauvais aussi je crois
Totally wrong, but I don't have the patience of Marcus to discuss this with you
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Teddy |
13 days agohazard14: Totalement faux mais j'ai pas la patience de Marcus pour discuter de sa avec toi
Marcus isn't patient
he quickly exits the discussion with a pirouette like you. I've already told you what I thought, but time will prove me right or wrong.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Hydilik |
13 days agoLikewise, it's hard to find potential at 80+
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Bastoun_34 |
12 days agoIt's the same here, and I think even more so this season. And it will show with the detection split at the end of the season: nothing above 78...
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
lens59 |
12 days agoBrutus |
12 days agoWe're going to end up with the pot73 max we had 10/15 years ago!
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Magikcats |
11 days agoBastoun_34: Idem ici, et encore plus cette saison je trouve. Et ça se verra avec le partage de détection en fin de saison: que dalle au-dessus de 78...
I haven't even started
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Blagoje Vidinic |
11 days agoI found a handful of 79s but 3/4 of them are GACs... I don't know if that's better ^^
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
lens59 |
11 days agoleakcim58 |
11 days agoYes, the same goes for me. It's no longer worth wasting your time searching for peanuts.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
lens59 |
11 days agoWell, maybe it won't be long before the 79/80s are the big pot
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Bastoun_34 |
11 days agoThat's what I tell myself: for the last few seasons, I haven't made any offers below 79-80, but not so long ago, I wasn't spitting on pot. 76-77.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Zeus |
11 days agoClearly, the next potential highs will be 79/80 as before, which is good
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Teddy |
11 days agoZeus: Clairement les prochains hauts potentiels seront 79/80 comme avant ce qui est bien
Not sure it's good for the 79 80 max game 😄. When you have blinds that come out 90 Pot you know the turn the game is going to take if that's the case
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Clamsii |
11 days agoTeddy: Pas sur que ça soit bon pour le jeu des 79 80 max 😄. Quand ta des store qui sorte 90 Pot on sait le virage que va prendre le jeu si c'est le cas
We're back exactly where we were before, where the blind will pose a problem by taking out big pots. If I'm not mistaken, it's to deal with this that he's increased the potential in detection and RJ.
We'll have to see what direction we go in, but it looks like a step backwards
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Teddy |
11 days agoClamsii: On revient exactement comment avant où le store posera problème en sortant des gros pot. Si je ne me trompe pas c'est d'ailleurs pour palier à ça qu'il a augmenter le potentiel dans la detection et RJ.
A voir vers quelle direction on va prendre mais ça semble être un retour en arrière
It's already a step backwards, it's brought back the same developments as before the 99ngs and the time when blinds were more interesting than anything else
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Bastoun_34 |
10 days agoLet's just say that the blind should make it quicker/easier to find a big potential customer. But it shouldn't be the only way to find one.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message