Djaiss |

10/01/2025

Hello everyone,

Detection is time-consuming and, over the last few seasons, the results have been very poor 🥺 It's been a few seasons now that the most I've found is 1 or 2 81 potentials at the most. This also has a cost (going to a country, changing cities, offering a contract,...).

I understand that this is limited in time and number of clicks to avoid abuse, but here the best potentials present after spending many hours to detect are very (too) low.

There is currently a better chance of finding a good potential (above 80) by sending your recruiter (just click and pray 🙏). Some receive potentials well above 81 potential, it's rarer but over a season, you can send your recruiter 7 times. A friend of mine got 2 85 potentials in the same season... And a potential 82😅

Wouldn't it be better to "reward" those who scan the cities for hours on end and scatter potential players in each country who are at least as high as the best players found by the scout?

I'm putting this down here... 🙄😁

Thanks in advance for your feedback 😉

Djaiss


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Magpie |

10/01/2025

Subject & arguments already raised in the last audio with Aymeric.
That led to the situation you describe...
And I think your opinion is shared by many. The cursor is in the wrong place.

But that hasn't changed despite the comments. Good luck! :)


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

|

10/01/2025

Get ready what thinks detection will go up lol😆.
I can see the recruiter going down more 😅


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

ManuM |

10/01/2025

Not necessarily to go down, but that the potential 85s that the recruiter brings back are rarer, because then detection is no longer useful.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

lens59 |

10/01/2025

You're lucky me 79 max


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

|

10/01/2025

Aymeric's main aim was to reduce the probability of finding good players, but not too much to reduce the levels that could be found, as he had said in the last few audio clips.

I think he wanted to prevent one person from supplying youngsters to several clubs. I think that's a shame because it opens up possibilities for agreements in terms of mutual assistance.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

lens59 |

10/01/2025

Given that there are so many countries and a limited number every 6 hours unless you spend your life detecting.
The positions are limited in a starting 11 unless you lose 1 ng by changing position.
You really have to have Q to fall on an 80+


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Clamsii |

10/01/2025

It's simple, for me it's been 2 seasons that I haven't got anything back from detection, very disturbing when you're a nation ^^


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

OMstar83 |

10/01/2025

Come to the Nexus, I'll guarantee you 3 good youngsters per season, and I'll put Adrimax on the scouting team for you.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

khad19 |

10/01/2025

Very disturbing indeed when you're doing a nation + maximising potential (not having a level 10 cdf yet). It's even more profitable for me, I've stopped, it's better to send your scout once a week than to spam the detections from now on. You're going to find 1 or 2 interesting players max per season.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Lulo |

10/01/2025

Of course, a few seasons ago, potential 80s were the norm and all the clubs ended up with 10 or more potential 80s players. That broke the market. Today we're back to where we were before, with potential players closer to 81 max and potential 78 as the norm. I think that's fine too. The people who are motivated will be able to have potentials of 81 and the others 78 or so, and that will simply lead to a better reward for the researchers because the ngs of 81 or more will have a real price on the transfer market.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

|

10/01/2025

It's hard to find a 78... it's complicated lol


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Djaiss |

10/01/2025

Mouais mais impossible de lutter contre le 99G Qqui étaient censé disparaître ou autres extra-terrestres à consigne 🙄

I'm old-fashioned, I train very classically 😅 it's a choice 🤷🏻‍♂️

But the gulf shouldn't be so wide between those who train the old-fashioned way and the tinkerers (excuse the term) 🤔


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

lens59 |

10/01/2025

Personally, I've done some nations a favour with my youngsters but I can't find anything for myself 🙄🙄🙄
I'm not in a bad way in terms of cdf but attacking is becoming complicated 😆


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

lens59 |

10/01/2025

The 99 will be gone in a few seasons


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Djaiss |

10/01/2025

I feel like I've been reading this for ages and there are still legions of them 🤔

And when they're not 99NGs, they're players who have even more impact than a 99NG because boosted on instructions/styles so for me, the problem has been circumvented to be even worse 😂

Each to their own kiff on this game but then makes the odds balanced by offering valid potentials ⚖️


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Djaiss J'ai l'impression de lire ça depuis des lustres et ils sont légion encore 🤔 Et quand ce ne sont pas des 99NG, ce sont des joueurs qui ont encore plus d'impact…

hazard14 |

10/01/2025

I have a 99ng team and I totally agree with you. I can't wait for the big ng99s to leave because I don't even think you need to be tactically good to win. With everyone on the same team, the difference would be much clearer


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
3 more replies
hazard14 J'ai une équipe 99ng et je suis pourtant total d'accord avec toi. Vivement que les gros ng99 partent car il y a même plus besoin d'être bon tactiquement pour g…

Djaiss |

10/01/2025

Wait a minute, as I said earlier, it's not just the 99NGs that are getting out of hand, it's all the players who have been boosted to the max with instructions/styles 😶

Hats off to those who have got round the trick because the game allows them to but you have to accept that there are several styles (ouuuuh) of manager 🤓

A rebalancing seems necessary to me ⚖️


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Djaiss Attends, comme dit précédemment, ce ne sont pas seulement les 99NG qui foutent le brin, il y a tous les joueurs boostés consignes/styles à outrance 😶 je conna…

hazard14 |

10/01/2025

Aymeric has already greatly reduced the impact of the styles.
I don't mind the styles, they're part of the game, but 99ngs with 30 to 50 d endu how can you compete with that, it's really quite complicated


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
hazard14 J'ai une équipe 99ng et je suis pourtant total d'accord avec toi. Vivement que les gros ng99 partent car il y a même plus besoin d'être bon tactiquement pour g…

|

10/01/2025

😅 you're going to be disappointed lol


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

lens59 |

10/01/2025

Complicated detection +80
Endurance compulsory given the fatigue
I deduce that there won't be many competitive 99s once the 25/26 year olds retire.
You'll have 99s but with 5/8 Endurance at half-time or even before they'll be very tired


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

hazard14 |

10/01/2025

I won't be the only one 😉


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

|

10/01/2025

It's not the first time we've changed and the good ones with 99s are still good with 90s 🤣. The bad ones too, I think


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
C'est pas la première fois qu'on change et les bons avec des 99 restent bon avec des 90 🤣. Les mauvais aussi je crois

hazard14 |

10/01/2025

Totally wrong, but I don't have the patience of Marcus to discuss this with you


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
hazard14 Totalement faux mais j'ai pas la patience de Marcus pour discuter de sa avec toi

|

10/01/2025

Marcus isn't patient
he quickly exits the discussion with a pirouette like you. I've already told you what I thought, but time will prove me right or wrong.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Hydilik |

10/01/2025

Likewise, it's hard to find potential at 80+


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Bastoun_34 |

11/01/2025

It's the same here, and I think even more so this season. And it will show with the detection split at the end of the season: nothing above 78...


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Magikcats |

12/01/2025

I haven't even started


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

lens59 |

11/01/2025

I take a different look at the 79


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Brutus |

11/01/2025

We're going to end up with the pot73 max we had 10/15 years ago!


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Blagoje Vidinic |

12/01/2025

I found a handful of 79s but 3/4 of them are GACs... I don't know if that's better ^^


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

lens59 |

12/01/2025

Only 79 in various positions


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

leakcim58 |

12/01/2025

Yes, the same goes for me. It's no longer worth wasting your time searching for peanuts.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

lens59 |

12/01/2025

Well, maybe it won't be long before the 79/80s are the big pot


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Bastoun_34 |

12/01/2025

That's what I tell myself: for the last few seasons, I haven't made any offers below 79-80, but not so long ago, I wasn't spitting on pot. 76-77.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Zeus |

12/01/2025

Clearly, the next potential highs will be 79/80 as before, which is good


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

|

12/01/2025

Not sure it's good for the 79 80 max game 😄. When you have blinds that come out 90 Pot you know the turn the game is going to take if that's the case


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Pas sur que ça soit bon pour le jeu des 79 80 max 😄. Quand ta des store qui sorte 90 Pot on sait le virage que va prendre le jeu si c'est le cas

Clamsii |

12/01/2025

We're back exactly where we were before, where the blind will pose a problem by taking out big pots. If I'm not mistaken, it's to deal with this that he's increased the potential in detection and RJ.
We'll have to see what direction we go in, but it looks like a step backwards


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Clamsii On revient exactement comment avant où le store posera problème en sortant des gros pot. Si je ne me trompe pas c'est d'ailleurs pour palier à ça qu'il a augme…

|

12/01/2025

It's already a step backwards, it's brought back the same developments as before the 99ngs and the time when blinds were more interesting than anything else


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message

Bastoun_34 |

13/01/2025

Let's just say that the blind should make it quicker/easier to find a big potential customer. But it shouldn't be the only way to find one.


This message has been translated. (FR) Original message