The idea is to create a new competition mixing IE and IS to make the competition more indecisive, improve the readability of IS matches and strengthen the role of the coach.

First phase: 16-team championship formula based on the current divisions. Each agreement plays a maximum of 50 matches in IE mode from day 1 to day 28

Second phase: MAIN play-off phase for the top eight teams. This would be played solely by the selectors in IS mode. The winner of the regular season plays the 8th-placed team, the 2nd-placed team plays the 7th-placed team, etc. The 2 finalists advance to the next division.
or
cONSOLIDATED play-off phase for the last eight agreements. This would be played solely by the selectors in IS mode. The 9th-placed team in the regular season plays the 16th-placed team, while the 10th-placed team plays the 15th-placed team. The 2 lowest-ranked first-round losers in the regular season would be relegated to the lower division.

What do you think?

To be seen. But from D28 to D56 no more ie for the other players apart from the coach?

A priori, the system as it is works well... The title of the agreements, whatever the divisions, is not illegitimate.
So why change something that is working well?

One question,
The IEs are they distributed in a way or you will play all the agreement?
Example agreement X will have to face 15 agreement what will make 6,6..match then not right for a 7th match between the 2 agreements etc?

Hello
I don't see the point of merging these two parts (IS and IE)
I think it will cause more problems than fun to play
,🤔 that's my opinion 🦧🦧🦧

I can see the idea, on paper it's nice, but we tend to play quite a lot of games during the break, so we'd have to go up to 1 day before the return leg of the championships, except that then those who are on the fringes of the championships will complain that there are lots of IS (well, I think that in your system there would be 3).
And 50 IE instead of 100 is likely to be frustrating
You could offer 4 groups of 4 in the final phase, with only semi-finals and finals, but 2 SIs in the season is not a lot....(but it would give it an event feel)
In short, the phase aspect is a good idea, but I think it will create too much frustration

It's just a suggestion from Sikora, guys, which could allow us to be more closely associated with the American play-off system or the current LDC format, nothing more

The entente championship is based on regularity, and given the sometimes unpredictable results, for me it remains the most prestigious title in the game, albeit in its current form. 100 IE, 6 IS, every point counts at the end of the season.
I respect your idea, but it would make the agreement title far too 'random' in this formula

Against Sorry, I really like the current system of 100 ie and 6 is, it's very good
Thank you for your proposal anyway, you've worked well on the subject, well done

Alexandre67310: Le championnat entente se joue sur la régularité, et vu les résultats qui parfois sont aléatoire, il reste pour moi le titre le + prestigieux du jeu, mais dans sa forme actuelle. 100 IE, 6 IS, chaque point compte en fin de saison.
Je respecte ton idée mais elle ferait du titre entente un titre bien trop « aléatoire » dans cette formule

image](https://i.imgur.com/sQGw3ic.png)
Here's the list of successes over the last few seasons... Well done to LR, but there's still a lack of adversity and, above all, surprises.
On the other hand, with 50 matches per IE season, it might be possible to encourage the creation of competitive agreements, thereby reducing the number of members per agreement.
I know that this project won't please the members of the 5 teams that have been leading the league for the last twenty seasons, but it would be really exciting! Not to mention the role of coach, which would be far more prestigious than it is today.

On paper it's nice, but it seems complicated to organise, especially the second part.

And the current system seems to me to be just fine as it is. It's true that the winners' trophy is still not shared very widely, but it's a title that's not open to dispute, and we're seeing agreements emerge as the seasons go by.

kiki-sainté: Contre désolé j aime beaucoup le système actuel 100 ie et 6 is c est très bien
Merci de ta proposition quand même tu as bien bossé le sujet bravo à toi

Ditto

Wissam.Mn: Idem

Ditto
The current system is very good

There is no problem with the games here.
The problem is that the players get tired.
There are already enough tournaments.
There should be a league system in these games, but the match should end in a short time without players getting tired. It shouldn't spoil the seriousness of the overall statistics.