iMcCarthy77 |
8 month agoHi 🤝
Does anyone know why the staff market is limited to 1 million? Honestly I find it really average I had some interesting positions where I had to make room that I had to sell 1 million ... This is one of the biggest inconsistencies of the game ... At least put to 10 million especially that it is by level it is normal that the very good staffs of level 10 can sell a little more expensive ... and why not put there a journal of transfers staffs
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
lens59 |
8 month agoYes and no, look at the 80 ng at 1 M, they are between 58 and 60 years old, you don't do much with them, I've even seen a 61 year old.
If you charge more, some people are going to donate money like that and that's going to be a hell of a lot of extra work to keep an eye on
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
iMcCarthy77 |
8 month agoZeus: Salut Imc;
Tu as raisons, ça devrait être relevé mis la limite de 1M c'était pour éviter les abus il me semble !
ça serait une bonne évolution
Bonne idée ;)
At the time, I paid 10 million to do a training course with a 1pt skill gain. Do you see the inconsistency? Because if you want to sell it afterwards, you still lose a lot of money... The market is standardised, so we need to create a tier system to regulate it... Besides, I have the impression that the influence of ea on a player's progress is marginal, so we need to increase the impact of ea on players' progress..avoir le top a un niveau 90 ou + qui forcément se vendrerait super cher ..L'idée d'un joueur voir un ea de top niveau qui puisse compenser le retard de progression d'un joueur serait vraiment pas mal non plus et un gros plus pour les formateurs...
We have too many similar teams in the game and by putting the ea back at the heart of the game you create competitive gaps and that's not the case at the moment...
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
iMcCarthy77 |
8 month agolens59: Oui et non regarde les 80 ng à 1 M ils ont de 58 à 60 ans tu n'en fais pas grand chose j'ai même vu un 61 ans .
Si tu mets plus cher certains vont se faire des dons argent comme ça et ça va faire un sacré taff en plus pour surveiller
You just set up a staff transfer log like you do for players or you set up tiers.
There are 85+ or even 90 in skill on the game and some have paid no less than 100m for it ..so the bridé a 1m ya un peu un soucis
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Galywat |
8 month agoiMcCarthy77: Tu instaures juste un journal des transferts de staff comme c'est le cas pour les joueurs ou tu met en place des paliers ..
Il ya des 85+ voir 90 en compétence sur le jeu et certains ont déboursés pas moins de 100m pour ça ..donc le bridé a 1m ya un peu un soucis
After spending 100 million on that, when the difference between 80 and 90 is practically nil... The club that did it had money to lose.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Lulo |
8 month agoGood idea, I think that in any case there is a reform to be done on the staff which has too little impact on the club's performance (in any position) now it would be nice to be able to buy or sell a little more than 1million and at the same time improve the transfer log to help the admins in case of cheating (reporting).
I recently bought a 90 for 1m and I thought I was very lucky. When you tell yourself that, it's because there's a problem in the market.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
iMcCarthy77 |
8 month agoGalywat: Après dépenser 100M pour ça, alors que la différence entre 80 et 90 est quasiment nulle... C'est que le club qui a fait ça avait de l'argent à perdre.
Personally, I don't know it, I haven't done any training for a long time, but if what you're saying is true, it's problematic... Logically, the percentage gains between a skill at 80 and another at 90 should be significant... and what's the point of paying to gain in skill? This is one part of the game where I think Aymeric still has some work to do
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Galywat |
8 month agoiMcCarthy77: Personnellement je la connais pas ça fait longtemps que je n'ai pas fait de formation mais si ce que tu dis est vrai c'est problématique.. Logiquement les gains en pourcentage pris entre une compétence à 80 et l'autre à 90 devraient être importants..et quelle est l'utilité de payer pour gagner en compétence ? C'est une partie du jeu où Aymeric a encore du travail je pense
On paper I agree with you. That's been true for a number of years now. In my opinion, the price is designed precisely so that you can make the most of it, but only if you can afford it. It's not something you're going to make a profit on.
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
Brutus |
8 month agoAfter that, I really think there's something to be done with 80++ staff...
For example
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
LincolnHawk |
8 month agoAfter that, it's a good thing some of them suck, because it doesn't really make you want to hire them ^^....
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message
seblelionnais |
8 month agoWe've got the staff transfer log. Everything is at 0 ^^
This message has been translated. (FR) Original message