I think it would be cool to display the value of players on their profile... A kind of estimate, a bit like the estimate is made for the price of TV Rights (but based on age, potential and NG). I saw a message on the forum from someone who complained about potential fraud on player transfers; having an estimate of the value of players displayed on their profiles will greatly reduce fraud in my humble opinion. It will also prevent new players from getting scammed... I have new players in my agreement and when I look at their transfer log I see aberrations: 34 years old 40 NG at 4 Million (It ruins the experience of the game for new players sometimes honestly) --> then to get revenge they will put 30 years old / 25 NG at more than 1 Million (hoping that someone buys). This is the idea of improvement that I had in mind for a long time and in view of the growing number of fraud and breach of trust, we must act. Thank you for those who will pay attention to this message. Peace ✌️

Back to the past it was like that before and personally I really liked having an idea of price on the sheet

It is the market that defines the price, supply and demand. Putting such information distorts free will, the basics of supply and demand.

There are tables in the "rules" section that help determine a player's value: #community?rules

There’s a butto that shows something similar. It shows the previous transfers of the specified player and also recent transfers of similar players. That it what I use to determine the value of a player

We don’t have to be spoon fed for everything. Figure some stuff out yourself. I would have loved it if we weren’t regulating values but has a varying economy. Anyways it is what it is. Can’t love the game less like this

I added a rough estimate made by the game of the player's value, on the page "At the club since...". This is the median value of the table of transfers of similar players displayed on this same page.

Thank you very much! We will be able to get an idea of the player's value.

I don't see this new feature as a "threat" to the classification Morten mentioned. Since we can negotiate any transfer up to -50%/+50%, and the player's value is in line with this classification, we can negotiate with the seller within the rules and limit the risk of being too greedy.

Thanks for the feedback, is it possible to compare players based on position? Seeing a striker compared to a goalkeeper greatly distorts his price

It should be stated as an estimate and not a value And a range for your players 45/65 minimum. In addition I noticed that the figure decreases from day to day in 2 seasons gift value 😁

Wouldn't it be possible to code the tables so that the game values correspond to them? I don't know anything about coding, maybe a stupid question on my part

I may be wrong based on my opinion but I think that this average value (median in mathematical terms), better reflects the average value of a player compared to the table. Let me explain. Example: I take the player from Morten's example. #transferts?log&jid=539454 Estimate at 54m so minimum 27m and 108m If we look closely there is a player of 201 points recently bought 26.6m, probably at auction and also another 99ng player recently bought at 95m. So we can deduce that for this player, the price range 27m-108m reflects the current state of the market very well. In my opinion, the difference between this new indicator of the average value of a player, and that of the table is that the update is continuous with the new indicator.

The sample is very small, subject to seasonal variations and includes players sold in the context of auctions. While the indicator is useful, it cannot replace the tables, which can be improved, set up in the context of a dispute. What we see coming is as big as a truck.

Anyway, let's be clear. It is the tables in the regulations that will be authentic, nothing else. This is just an indicative price, that's all.