Hello everyone, why don't we make groups of 16 teams but use the same system as the new Champions League reform?

Season not long enough between the championship, the Champions League, the IE, the cups, the IS, the federations, put 15 championship matches per season, no more breaks, no more matches for young people or few

kiki-sainté: Saison pas assez longue entre le championnat la ldc les ie les coupes les is les fédérations mettre 15 matchs de championnat par saison plus aucune trêve plus de matchs pour les jeunes ou peu

Or groups of 14 come back to the same number of matches in the basic season

Here is my little suggestion: 30 championships (13 French championships, 16 foreign championships and finally the VF masters) An average of about 135 clubs for the French championships. For the other championships, we are on an average of about 102 clubs (I have not taken into account the inactive ones but the exact number of clubs currently). In pale pink, the championships with staggered schedules (5).

I can't wait to see the number of registered players in the Brazilian championship when we have removed the inactive ones. Even in D1, there are two clubs that have been inactive for a year. Once again, this is a proposal that does not take into account the real number of players in the different championships. Currently, if we look at the VF ranking of the championships, Alsace and Champagne Ardennes are above the VF masters. And we are proposing to group them together. Where is the sporting logic? It's as if irl we were proposing to group the English, Italian and Spanish championships in the same league, while we divide the Chinese championship into 3 provinces, because in terms of population it is more balanced.

I don't understand the point of any proposal before the inactives are released, I doubt they will be distributed fairly either. There are only a few days to wait, be patient.

Marcus Aurelius: Je ne comprends pas l’intérêt d’une quelconque proposition avant d’avoir sorti les inactifs, je doute qu’ils soient répartis équitablement en plus.

Il n’y a que quelques jours à attendre, soyez patient.

I just hope that this idea of removing inactive players from the championships is not an exceptional case, I think it's a good idea in the long term. As soon as you reach a certain period of inactivity, you are ejected from the championships. On small clubs, it's not "super annoying" but when you have a big club that suddenly stops, but remains in the 2nd/3rd divisions, it's more annoying.

Why more annoying? If you don't play anymore it's normal. And if you resume the game you re-register.

Inactive from what point is a club considered inactive?

This proposal is a good idea, apart from keeping the master vf, and removing all the inactives, it could be interesting to keep some in each championship for small clubs that are starting out, as for the Brazilian championships or other of the kind with a single division it is better to remove

Flo58: Cette proposition est une bonne idée, à part de garder la vf master, et de sortir tout les inacitfs, cela peut être intéressant d'en garder dans chaque championnat pour les petits clubs qui débute, quand au championnats brésilien ou autre du genre avec une seule division mieux vaut enlever

I think the VF Masters should keep its place (but just put this championship more in the spotlight).

Dino_: Je pense que la VF Masters doit garder sa place (mais juste mettre ce championnat plus en valeur).

Titi is working on it season after season ☺️

Dino_: Je pense que la VF Masters doit garder sa place (mais juste mettre ce championnat plus en valeur).

It is true that this type of championship does not exist in real life, just like regional championships if we go in this direction, so why not keep it, but it is clear that there are too many championships, or not enough active players on the game, a sorting would be welcome to re-dynamize all that

Flo58: Cette proposition est une bonne idée, à part de garder la vf master, et de sortir tout les inacitfs, cela peut être intéressant d'en garder dans chaque championnat pour les petits clubs qui débute, quand au championnats brésilien ou autre du genre avec une seule division mieux vaut enlever

Are you talking about my proposal?

Fontenit85: Tu parle de ma proposition ?

No sorry, I was talking about Dino's proposal.

Ok 😉

I might be talking nonsense, but to avoid having a bunch of relegated clubs, can't we move to 16-team championships but without the return phase. 7 home games and 8 away games (or vice versa). I don't know if there is any real advantage to playing at home given that I take as many carrots in both cases...

Fontenit85: Bonjour à tous

Pourquoi faisons pas des poule de 16 équipes mais que aller du même système que la nouvelle réforme ldc?

Oh yeah I hadn't seen this post before putting mine! The weekend fumes are tough 🤣

ManuM: Ah ouais j'avais pas vu ce post avant de mettre le mien! Dures les vapeurs du week-end 🤣

You're welcome... 😂

Fontenit85: Il y a pas de quoi ... 😂

Well, I agree with you!🤣