On VF, there are matches (lost or not won) after which we quickly cry foul under the weight of the injustice of the result, like in football in fact. And isn't that, in the end, also what makes us love this sport with its uncertainty like no other? Aymeric was not mistaken and I praise the conclusion of his reflection which led him to integrate or favor an element of randomness which could always leave, also on VF, the manager of Carquefou hoping to beat OM or the one de Rodez beat PSG, no offense to the grumpy Véfiens. So, I will not publish this post in the famous carrots topic of the season, despite the 19 scoreless chances in this match: #match?mid=5789626 ... why not. .. the lack of realism in a match exists and it is not at this level that I question myself, but in the search for realism at all costs... Ghost clubs, the "sparring partners" of our friendly matches have very disparate levels. Therefore, I have no doubt that to make the result more realistic, "safeguards" are integrated into the algorithm in order to avoid a litany of river or even Danube scores, like 15-0!! We can understand and support the idea... But by wanting to force realism in one direction... we provoke ridicule in the other! Indeed, regarding the context: I play with 4 attackers, young people in training but whose level is nevertheless more than sufficient to dominate my phantom opponent. His team is almost completely installed in the center, he only has 2 lateral DFs on the sides, the best of which has an NG of 22!!! (I should point out that the opposing club was assigned to me among the clubs classified at average level)... Obviously, I attack on the wings. My possession is 90%... a score worthy of presidential election results in Belarus!! In addition, my opponent finds himself at 10 per hour of play and I bring in 5 fresh replacements, all displaying a better NG than the replaced player: Another argument and not the least which should make the opposing team give in , the endurance of opposing players: At the end of the match it is more like the state of gassed cockroaches than that of willing players to participate in a match... So, certainly, we will have avoided a possible 15-0 which would have discredited VF but looking closer, the situation is not more glorious!

You're the best uncle!

As the teachers said on all my school report cards...Can do better.

thank you for the message. it stings

Another blow from the capitalist world....

Since you're talking about it, it's true that incredible situations, even if they have always existed, seem to be happening more. I think there was a re-configuration of the MDM a few days ago. The MDM seems to react differently, and I have the feeling that the goal probabilities have been very slightly reduced, but which unfortunately has already very visible consequences. It's a personal feeling, even if I've already seen it in quite a few matches already. The carrot (legendary level) that Vince took yesterday is the perfect illustration: 4.32 xG, it shows the devastating domination. We are not talking about slight domination, but about a one-sided game. Almost maximum because we can no longer reach 5 xG (in theory) since the resetting I'm talking about (maximum xG capped at 0.26 apparently). And yet, the opponent, ultra dominated, disconnected and having a totally inappropriate strategy, wins this match. Just the fact that he didn't cash in is miraculous. That he scores is a miracle within a miracle. So I share your feelings Uncle. There are regular matches where the unreal happens. And if the uncertainty of football is great, I'm not sure that it can be claimed in this kind of case. In your example, it's as if there weren't even 11 players facing you. And with their physique below 10%, we can imagine that they weren't even running. Studs. Who doesn't score against cones? (admit that when you read this, the image of THURAM appeared to you. It's ugly) Even in a district match, for 90 minutes, if the opponent is ULTRA dominated, 80% possession, there is necessarily a passing goal. It's a long 90 minutes for polo players who have never kicked a ball, and who have to defend against experienced players. I also noticed in my matches a much greater difficulty in planting. It may be temporary, but it has stood out to me in recent days (or even created chances despite 75% possession, a dominant attack, etc.) Come on, fingers crossed that the cursor takes its good place, and courage until then Uncle'!

We can always reach 5 xG as proof in uncle's match. He has 5.2xG and the match is from 07/11

Socrate: On peut toujours atteindre 5 d'xG pour preuve le match de tonton. Il a 5,2xG et le match date du 11/07

Oh. The maximum xG per occasion went from 0.27 to 0.26, apart from strange cases where it sometimes exceeds, without explanation. So maximum total xGs have in theory gone down too. I went up to 5.4 once but it was the max of the max. It probably went down to 5.2 as you say, I haven't done the precise calculations, I admit. This is why I think the chances of scoring have decreased. But hey, the laziness of collecting data. I just look around, or worse, the interview area ^^ Wait & see

already I must have missed the info I think unless there isn't any lol, but the xgs which go up on a fault or a card, what does that mean? I had the case again yesterday in the championship otherwise fully agree with you kamarad!

I'm joining you . and thank you for your intervention comrade.

Magpie: Ah. Les xG maximales par occasions sont passées de 0.27 à 0.26, hormis des cas étranges où ça dépasse parfois, sans explication.
Donc les xG totales maximales ont en théorie baissé aussi. J'étais monté à 5.4 une fois mais c'était le max du max. Ca a probablement baissé à 5.2 comme tu dis, je n'ai pas fait les calculs précis, j'avoue.

C'est pour cela que je pense que les probas de marquer ont diminué. Mais bon, la flemme de récolter des données. Je me contente juste de regarder

I'm in the middle of a match and I have an opportunity that generated an xG of 0.34 in one shot!

ah but there are some! in my previous matches, 1 foul, 1 occaz, 1 goal, 1.31 xG in total

I thought you said that the maximum for an OCCAZ was 0.26 xG ^^.

If you look at my last 4 official matches you will see some of them scoring!

Socrate: Je pensais que tu disais que le maximum pour une occaz etait de 0,26 xG ^^.

Yes yes. that’s very often it. but sometimes, nothing happens, abnormally, and suddenly, you have something happen that “catch up” on the delay. In any case, it's complicated to explain. we'll chat in PM if you want, because we're moving away from there, and we're going to get into some Lomax-time

WOW. You really deserve at least a single goal and win the game 😥

in the next we will

Indeed, I felt that the teams were less marked. I have a few matches where I dominate and nothing not a goal or the opposite or I get dominated and bam I but a miraculous goal. I don't mind which are matches where you go through but these days each day he has an injured person a red card while you and, in normal level of aggression but I recognize that it is last time the mdm sometimes does anything and this can annoy players who are demotivated by irritation.