new update with the return of pot85 +? and the offering to each player who participates in a u17 tournament of a nugget with great potential?

for a return, would it still be necessary to have had an arrival!!

I did the u17 tournament

I had one too I don't know if it's a bug??

if it's a bug thank you for the fairness..... even with an RJ 90 I only get pot65

It's definitely a bug... And obviously it has been dealt with. It remains to be seen whether those who benefited will be able to keep the players. There were some heavy ones in the lot.

or offer everyone a 79 mini pot like that, complete fairness

When some got 89s, not sure of fairness

Arazosv: Quand certains ont eu des 89, pas sûr de l'équité

that's for sure, but between an 80 even mini, and nothing, I prefer the 80 🤣

deleted all the players had today? or you give a player to everyone in a tournament

I'm not going to say logical, even if some people knew how to take advantage of it, in their place I would also be happy, but in ours it's not

certainly a bug, these are players potentially intended for the store who found themselves in the U17 tournament reward.

logic would dictate that they be removed, easy for us to say, because we don't have them

at the same time if you would not have opened this topic someone else would have benefited from it too lol

I'm not jealous, if the members keep the young player, good for them. There are much more serious things in life.

u17 is a scam

In any case, there have never been as many U17 Tournaments as yesterday 🙄

There are still quite a few players coming out this morning, but at a lower frequency nonetheless. So maybe it's not a bug...? No luck for me, I used the U17 event last week. No luck again: I was in the match for the 20% physics distributed to everyone. There's no denying it, timing-wise, I'm pretty good ^^

Nicularo: Il y a encore pas mal de joueurs qui sortent ce matin, mais à moins grande fréquence quand même. Ce n'est donc peut-être pas un bug... ?

Pas de chance pour moi, j'ai utilisé l'évènement U17 la semaine dernière.
Pas de chance bis : j'étais en match pour les 20% de physique distribués à tout le monde.

Y'a pas à dire, niveau timing, je suis pas mal ^^

🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣
So sorry mate.
If it helps you!?
I was Also in match during the 20% physics distribution and I did my event way before last week 😂

What is “strange” above all is the fact that they are all re-people. Wouldn't that be intentional?

After little debate to be had, this is a bug creating a big lack of fairness. Aymeric should cancel the U17 tournaments and remove the young people, and give the possibility following cancellation to do it again without a bug...

After the +20% physics and the U17 event What's the next surprise? free 90Ng with 50 endu?

Akram: Après les +20% de physique et l'événement U17
Quel est la prochaine surprise ?
des libres 90Ng avec 50 endu ?

For that you have to wait until I make a bad move or until I renew the contracts ahahah ^^

where strawberries with sugar 🤣

Socrate: Pour cela faut que tu attende que je fasse une mauvaise manip ou que je renouvelle pas les contrats ahahah ^^

What if it injects lookalikes? the work you have done since X season will be made available to the entire community for free (well, the lucky ones..)

as said in private, pure chance and it comes from the recruiter. u17 is in 3 days 😁

Plarchios: Apres peu de debat a avoir, c´est un bug creant un gros manque d´equité.
Aymeric devrait annuler les tournoi U17 et supprimer les jeunes, et remettre la possibilité suite annulation de le refaire sans bug...

the world is not fair bro. dont cancel someone else luck. if you got a younger player tou wouldnt be saying this. those people did not cheat the game. they can fix the bug but no need to remove the players

only Aymeric has the bug or voluntary response. ? in detection for the moment not fun so maybe it's put differently +80

Akram: Après les +20% de physique et l'événement U17
Quel est la prochaine surprise ?
des libres 90Ng avec 50 endu ?

frankly I hope, the free ones are missing...

lens59: seul aymeric a la réponse bug ou volontaire. ?
en détection pour l'instant pas folichon alors peut-être que c'est mis autrement les +80

Hello There is no bug, thank you for your concern. The outcome of the U17 Tournament event is governed by luck. There is therefore no guarantee.

I confirm !!

The managers must have really been unlucky before for this much to come out at once

ahhhh! poor me I can't do a u 17 at the moment 😭😭😭😡😂

For those who can't do the u17 event, we might have a nice surprise with the return of the RJ or not

grissais's man: Pour ceux qui ne peuvent pas faire l'événement u17 , on aura peut-être une belle surprise avec le retour du RJ ou pas

Yeah it will probably increase, I might get a 70 instead of the 60 I get!

aymeric45: Bonjour
Il n'y a pas de bug, merci de vous en soucier.
Le résultat de l'évènement Tournoi U17 est régi par la chance. Il n'a a donc aucune garantie.

Let's see, Aymeric... Yesterday, around 19 hours ago, there was a series of 32 CONSECUTIVE tournaments which gave rise to a junior discovery. I repeat, CONSECUTIVE, without even a single failure. Luck cannot be invoked there, let's see... So much the better for happy managers eh! But let's not talk about luck on this one. Not 5, not 10, but 32 in a row! Probably a poorly adjusted setting, no? :)

come on, no suspicion 🤔

when it's been 10 years that you have no personal luck.... when I see some who for 6 7 seasons have had mini 7 or 8 pot 85+ at a given moment there is a problem that means that on one side there is the one who can make the easy billion because only big pots while the other will struggle 20 seasons to arrive at the same result. The luck side at one point a little fed up

Come on, to say that you have to have proof or something else because it's a very serious suspicion, like favoritism towards certain players 🤔

At no point did he say that. Let's not read between the lines.

michbou: allons, pour dire cela il faut avoir des preuves ou autre car c'est une suspicion très grave, genre favoritisme envers certains joueurs 🤔

Aren't you tired of looking for problems where there aren't any? And even if Aymeric wanted to have a fair day of the U17 tournament and he doesn't want to say it, what difference does that make to your clubs, your ambitions and your goals? Snatching a youngster with 85 years of potential would make you win the LDC and the agreement title for 5 seasons in a row? Lots of question marks to which I know the answers, at least to the last 2 questions... The first one belongs to you even if I have my own idea.

Some came at the right time and some didn't, what's new? Nothing ! So let it piss.

before his subjects go down the drain like many others unfortunately. It would be good to close the original modified post because for me there is no debate.

Lebaygue: Vous êtes pas fatigués de chercher des problèmes la ou y en a pas ?

Et quand bien même Aymeric a voulu faire une journée kermesse du tournoi U17 et qu il ne veule pas le dire,ça change quoi a vos clubs,a vos ambitions et a vos objectifs ?

Choper un jeune de 85 de potentiel,vous ferait gagner la LDC et le titre entente durant 5 saisons d affilée ?

Beaucoup de points d interrogation dont je connais les réponses,au moins aux 2 dernières questions...La première vous appartient même si

1. The problem you are talking about was, I believe, knowing if any changes had taken place. VF changes very (too much?) regularly. Communication being a big weak point of the game, collective intelligence starts from a good feeling I think? Afterwards, request withdrawals for the lucky ones, well, everyone will do their own introspection, personally I'm rather happy for them, and too bad for the other 99%! Unfortunately, fortune on VF is made far too often with luck, or when changing settings. Too little with meticulous management (it's a bias). 2) The U17 Fair, according to you, this still poses a concern for fairness. Once again, some will have only had to bet on luck to make their fortune or happiness. And other clubs, just as deserving, were not invited to this fair. 3) Win the LDC with high-potential players: what do you know? Can we try? Or else it can be used to be sold to buy several competent players? Or for medium-sized clubs to finance infrastructure? Afterwards, as has already been said, so much the better for the lucky ones, that’s life. I’ll say it again, personally I’m happy for them. But I understand the feeling of those who feel wronged. They couldn't bite into the cake. This is understandable and respected. The problem therefore comes, I think, from all these incessant changes. It's hard to see clearly. We really need a roadmap, accessible to all, and we stick to it because it's really a downside of the game in my opinion. But Marcus summed it all up. Let's deal with it!

Those who don't want untimely changes (it's boring, we're not saying otherwise) play chess; the rules haven't changed in centuries.

Marcus Aurelius: Ceux qui ne veulent pas de changements intempestifs (c'est chiant, on ne dit pas le contraire) jouez aux échecs ; les règles n'ont pas changé depuis des siècles.

False, on virtuafail some people start the game with more pawns than the opponent. A story of luck factor it seems

I won't even explain the face of my account on Virtuatinder